These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28445582)
21. A pilot project: bioethics consultants as non-voting members of IRBs at the National Institutes of Health. DeRenzo EG; Wichman A IRB; 1990; 12(6):6-8. PubMed ID: 11651266 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Protecting human subjects in the NIH's Intramural Research Program: a draft instrument to evaluate convened meetings of its IRBs. Wichman A; Kalyan DN; Abbott LJ; Wesley R; Sandler AL IRB; 2006; 28(3):7-10. PubMed ID: 17036438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Commentary: Can we facilitate the ethical approval of international observational studies? Cuttini M; Saracci R Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 38(4):1108-9. PubMed ID: 19584126 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Numerous violations of federal informed consent requirements. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2004 Jan; 19(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 14997901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Multicentre drug trials, ethics approval and death of patients. Millar JA Intern Med J; 2008 Apr; 38(4):298-9; author reply 299. PubMed ID: 18380711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Reliance agreements and single IRB review of multisite research: Concerns of IRB members and staff. Lidz CW; Pivovarova E; Appelbaum P; Stiles DF; Murray A; Klitzman RL AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2018; 9(3):164-172. PubMed ID: 30285561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Problematic variation in local institutional review of a multicenter genetic epidemiology study. McWilliams R; Hoover-Fong J; Hamosh A; Beck S; Beaty T; Cutting G JAMA; 2003 Jul; 290(3):360-6. PubMed ID: 12865377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. How IRBs view and make decisions about coercion and undue influence. Klitzman R J Med Ethics; 2013 Apr; 39(4):224-9. PubMed ID: 22982492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Transitioning to the National Institutes of Health single institutional review board model: Piloting the use of the Streamlined, Multi-site, Accelerated Resources for Trials IRB Reliance. Vardeny O; Hernandez AF; Cohen LW; Franklin A; Baqai M; Palmer S; Bierer BE; Cobb N Clin Trials; 2019 Jun; 16(3):290-296. PubMed ID: 30866676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A central institutional review board for multi-institutional trials. Christian MC; Goldberg JL; Killen J; Abrams JS; McCabe MS; Mauer JK; Wittes RE N Engl J Med; 2002 May; 346(18):1405-8. PubMed ID: 11986418 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. An Institutional Review Board dilemma: responsible for safety monitoring but not in control. DeMets DL; Fost N; Powers M Clin Trials; 2006; 3(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 16773956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Research ethics boards: no data on quality of for-profit or non-profit IRBs. Shamoo AE; Woeckner E PLoS Med; 2006 Oct; 3(10):e459; author reply e460, e471. PubMed ID: 17076572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Use of central institutional review boards for multicenter clinical trials in the United States: a review of the literature. Check DK; Weinfurt KP; Dombeck CB; Kramer JM; Flynn KE Clin Trials; 2013 Aug; 10(4):560-7. PubMed ID: 23666951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The need for consistency in 407 reviews. Ross L Pediatrics; 2004 Sep; 114(3):901-2; author reply 901-2. PubMed ID: 15342880 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Single-Minded Research Review: The Common Rule and Single IRB Policy. Wolinetz CD; Collins FS Am J Bioeth; 2017 Jul; 17(7):34-36. PubMed ID: 28661736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Advances in multicentre ethics review. Irvine R Intern Med J; 2008 Apr; 38(4):297-8; author reply 299. PubMed ID: 18380710 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Considerations for ethics in multisite research in paediatric palliative care. Cadell S; Ho G; Jacques L; Wilson K; Davies B; Steele R Palliat Med; 2009 Apr; 23(3):274-5. PubMed ID: 19251832 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Safety boards must report their conclusions to IRBs. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1999 Oct; 14(10):3. PubMed ID: 11658061 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Public Comments on the Proposed Common Rule Mandate for Single-IRB Review of Multisite Research. Taylor HA; Ehrhardt S; Ervin AM Ethics Hum Res; 2019 Jan; 41(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 30744312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A step toward truly protecting human subjects: reviewing the review boards. Albrecht RR Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):54-5. PubMed ID: 15035952 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]