120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28446031)
21. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tada S; Stegaroiu R; Kitamura E; Miyakawa O; Kusakari H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):357-68. PubMed ID: 12814310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A new condyle implant design concept for an alloplastic temporomandibular joint in bone resorption cases.
Ramos A; Mesnard M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Oct; 44(10):1670-1677. PubMed ID: 27569384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Development of a three-dimensional finite element model of a human mandible containing endosseous dental implants. II. Variables affecting the predictive behavior of a finite element model of a human mandible.
Al-Sukhun J; Lindqvist C; Helenius M
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2007 Jan; 80(1):247-56. PubMed ID: 17078047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Influence of trabecular microstructure modeling on finite element analysis of dental implant].
Shen MJ; Wang GG; Zhu XH; Ding X
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 51(9):542-5. PubMed ID: 27596344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Three dimensional finite element analysis of biomechanical distribution of dental implants with immediate loading].
Han XL; Liu ZW; Li YT
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Apr; 29(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 21598477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Free body analysis, beam mechanics, and finite element modeling of the mandible of Alligator mississippiensis.
Porro LB; Holliday CM; Anapol F; Ontiveros LC; Ontiveros LT; Ross CF
J Morphol; 2011 Aug; 272(8):910-37. PubMed ID: 21567445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Load transfer in Christensen(®) TMJ in alloplastic total joint replacement for two different mouth apertures.
Ramos A; Mesnard M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1442-9. PubMed ID: 24954763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of load transfers in TMJ replacement using a standard and a custom-made temporal component.
Ramos A; Mesnard M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1766-72. PubMed ID: 25009108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Prediction at long-term condyle screw fixation of temporomandibular joint implant: A numerical study.
Ramos A; Duarte RJ; Mesnard M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 May; 43(4):469-74. PubMed ID: 25819477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A method for material parameter determination for the human mandible based on simulation and experiment.
Clason C; Hinz AM; Schieferstein H
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2004 Oct; 7(5):265-76. PubMed ID: 15621649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An experimental and theoretical composite model of the human mandible.
De Santis R; Mollica F; Esposito R; Ambrosio L; Nicolais L
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2005 Dec; 16(12):1191-7. PubMed ID: 16362221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparing the distribution of strains with the distribution of bone tissue in a human mandible: a finite element study.
Gröning F; Fagan M; O'higgins P
Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2013 Jan; 296(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 22976999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Modelling subcortical bone in finite element analyses: A validation and sensitivity study in the macaque mandible.
Panagiotopoulou O; Curtis N; O' Higgins P; Cobb SN
J Biomech; 2010 May; 43(8):1603-11. PubMed ID: 20176361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effect of implant thread design on stress distribution in anisotropic bone with different osseointegration conditions: a finite element analysis.
Mosavar A; Ziaei A; Kadkhodaei M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1317-26. PubMed ID: 26478976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Allometry in the distribution of material properties and geometry of the felid skull: why larger species may need to change and how they may achieve it.
Chamoli U; Wroe S
J Theor Biol; 2011 Aug; 283(1):217-26. PubMed ID: 21651916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Straight, semi-anatomic and anatomic TMJ implants: the influence of condylar geometry and bone fixation screws.
Ramos A; Completo A; Relvas C; Mesnard M; Simões JA
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 39(5):343-50. PubMed ID: 20801667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Modified bone density-dependent orthotropic material model of human mandibular bone.
Gačnik F; Ren Z; Hren NI
Med Eng Phys; 2014 Dec; 36(12):1684-92. PubMed ID: 25456399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Influence of a micro-thread at cervical position and a cylindrical intermediate zone on the mechanical behaviour of dental implants: A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Garitaonaindia U; Alcaraz JL
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2015 Sep; 229(9):670-80. PubMed ID: 26334036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Elastic properties and masticatory bone stress in the macaque mandible.
Dechow PC; Hylander WL
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2000 Aug; 112(4):553-74. PubMed ID: 10918129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Bone stress and strain after use of a miniplate for molar protraction and uprighting: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Largura LZ; Argenta MA; Sakima MT; Camargo ES; Guariza-Filho O; Tanaka OM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Aug; 146(2):198-206. PubMed ID: 25085303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
