These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28446138)

  • 21. Complex interventions and their implications for systematic reviews: a pragmatic approach.
    Petticrew M; Anderson L; Elder R; Grimshaw J; Hopkins D; Hahn R; Krause L; Kristjansson E; Mercer S; Sipe T; Tugwell P; Ueffing E; Waters E; Welch V
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Nov; 66(11):1209-14. PubMed ID: 23953085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Why do preconception and pregnancy lifestyle interventions demonstrate limited success in preventing overweight and obesity in children? A scoping review investigating intervention complexity, process evaluation components, and author interpretations.
    Philippe K; Teo SM; Perrotta C; McAuliffe FM; Phillips CM
    Obes Rev; 2024 Aug; ():e13822. PubMed ID: 39198996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Evidence-based Practice Center methods for systematically reviewing complex multicomponent health care interventions.
    Guise JM; Chang C; Viswanathan M; Glick S; Treadwell J; Umscheid CA; Whitlock E; Fu R; Berliner E; Paynter R; Anderson J; Motu'apuaka P; Trikalinos T
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Nov; 67(11):1181-91. PubMed ID: 25438663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessing the applicability of findings in systematic reviews of complex interventions can enhance the utility of reviews for decision making.
    Burford B; Lewin S; Welch V; Rehfuess E; Waters E
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Nov; 66(11):1251-61. PubMed ID: 23953081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Developing a targeted, theory-informed implementation intervention using two theoretical frameworks to address health professional and organisational factors: a case study to improve the management of mild traumatic brain injury in the emergency department.
    Tavender EJ; Bosch M; Gruen RL; Green SE; Michie S; Brennan SE; Francis JJ; Ponsford JL; Knott JC; Meares S; Smyth T; O'Connor DA
    Implement Sci; 2015 May; 10():74. PubMed ID: 26003785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A framework for scaling up health interventions: lessons from large-scale improvement initiatives in Africa.
    Barker PM; Reid A; Schall MW
    Implement Sci; 2016 Jan; 11():12. PubMed ID: 26821910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Developing and Optimising the Use of Logic Models in Systematic Reviews: Exploring Practice and Good Practice in the Use of Programme Theory in Reviews.
    Kneale D; Thomas J; Harris K
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142187. PubMed ID: 26575182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Using logic model methods in systematic review synthesis: describing complex pathways in referral management interventions.
    Baxter SK; Blank L; Woods HB; Payne N; Rimmer M; Goyder E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 May; 14():62. PubMed ID: 24885751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Systematic reviews of complex interventions: framing the review question.
    Squires JE; Valentine JC; Grimshaw JM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Nov; 66(11):1215-22. PubMed ID: 23953086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dimensions of the Complexity of Health Interventions: What Are We Talking About? A Review.
    Trompette J; Kivits J; Minary L; Alla F
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Apr; 17(9):. PubMed ID: 32354085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Considerations of complexity in rating certainty of evidence in systematic reviews: a primer on using the GRADE approach in global health.
    Montgomery P; Movsisyan A; Grant SP; Macdonald G; Rehfuess EA
    BMJ Glob Health; 2019; 4(Suppl 1):e000848. PubMed ID: 30775013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Investigating complexity in systematic reviews of interventions by using a spectrum of methods.
    Anderson LM; Oliver SR; Michie S; Rehfuess E; Noyes J; Shemilt I
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Nov; 66(11):1223-9. PubMed ID: 23953087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A case study applying pathway-oriented thinking to problem formulation for planning a systematic review.
    Roth N; Sandström J; Wilks MF
    Environ Int; 2020 Jul; 140():105768. PubMed ID: 32387853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. When complexity matters: a step-by-step guide to incorporating a complexity perspective in guideline development for public health and health system interventions.
    Movsisyan A; Rehfuess E; Norris SL
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Oct; 20(1):245. PubMed ID: 33008285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Synthesising quantitative evidence in systematic reviews of complex health interventions.
    Higgins JPT; López-López JA; Becker BJ; Davies SR; Dawson S; Grimshaw JM; McGuinness LA; Moore THM; Rehfuess EA; Thomas J; Caldwell DM
    BMJ Glob Health; 2019; 4(Suppl 1):e000858. PubMed ID: 30775014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessing the health benefits of advice services: using research evidence and logic model methods to explore complex pathways.
    Allmark P; Baxter S; Goyder E; Guillaume L; Crofton-Martin G
    Health Soc Care Community; 2013 Jan; 21(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 23039788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Choice of data extraction tools for systematic reviews depends on resources and review complexity.
    Elamin MB; Flynn DN; Bassler D; Briel M; Alonso-Coello P; Karanicolas PJ; Guyatt GH; Malaga G; Furukawa TA; Kunz R; Schünemann H; Murad MH; Barbui C; Cipriani A; Montori VM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 May; 62(5):506-10. PubMed ID: 19348977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.