These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28446203)
1. Clinicians' views and experiences of offering two alternative consent pathways for participation in a preterm intrapartum trial: a qualitative study. Chhoa CY; Sawyer A; Ayers S; Pushpa-Rajah A; Duley L Trials; 2017 Apr; 18(1):196. PubMed ID: 28446203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Women's views and experiences of two alternative consent pathways for participation in a preterm intrapartum trial: a qualitative study. Sawyer A; Chhoa C; Ayers S; Pushpa-Rajah A; Duley L Trials; 2017 Sep; 18(1):422. PubMed ID: 28886747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Women's experiences of participating in a randomised trial comparing alternative policies for timing of cord clamping at very preterm birth: a questionnaire study. Bradshaw L; Sawyer A; Mitchell E; Armstrong-Buisseret L; Ayers S; Duley L Trials; 2019 Apr; 20(1):225. PubMed ID: 30992034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cord pilot trial - immediate versus deferred cord clamping for very preterm birth (before 32 weeks gestation): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Pushpa-Rajah A; Bradshaw L; Dorling J; Gyte G; Mitchell EJ; Thornton J; Duley L; Trials; 2014 Jun; 15():258. PubMed ID: 24981366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recruiting and consenting into a peripartum trial in an emergency setting: a qualitative study of the experiences and views of women and healthcare professionals. Lawton J; Snowdon C; Morrow S; Norman JE; Denison FC; Hallowell N Trials; 2016 Apr; 17():195. PubMed ID: 27066777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cord pilot trial, comparing alternative policies for timing of cord clamping before 32 weeks gestation: follow-up for women up to one year. Bradshaw L; Sawyer A; Armstrong-Buisseret L; Mitchell E; Ayers S; Duley L BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Feb; 19(1):78. PubMed ID: 30791873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 'We knew it was a totally at random thing': parents' experiences of being part of a neonatal trial. Harvey M; Nongena P; Edwards D; Redshaw M Trials; 2017 Aug; 18(1):361. PubMed ID: 28764800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What women think about consent to research at the time of an obstetric emergency: a qualitative study of the views of a cohort of World Maternal Antifibrinolytic Trial participants. Houghton G; Kingdon C; Dower M; Shakur-Still H; Alfirevic Z BJOG; 2018 Dec; 125(13):1744-1753. PubMed ID: 29911309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The DiReCT study - improving recruitment into clinical trials: a mixed methods study investigating the ethical acceptability, feasibility and recruitment yield of the cohort multiple randomised controlled trials design. Richards DA; Ross S; Robens S; Borglin G Trials; 2014 Oct; 15():398. PubMed ID: 25318374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Parents report positive experiences about enrolling babies in a cord-related clinical trial before birth. Ayers S; Sawyer A; Düring C; Rabe H Acta Paediatr; 2015 Apr; 104(4):e164-70. PubMed ID: 25639827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Midwifery continuity of care versus standard maternity care for women at increased risk of preterm birth: A hybrid implementation-effectiveness, randomised controlled pilot trial in the UK. Fernandez Turienzo C; Bick D; Briley AL; Bollard M; Coxon K; Cross P; Silverio SA; Singh C; Seed PT; Tribe RM; Shennan AH; Sandall J; PLoS Med; 2020 Oct; 17(10):e1003350. PubMed ID: 33022010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Written versus verbal consent: a qualitative study of stakeholder views of consent procedures used at the time of recruitment into a peripartum trial conducted in an emergency setting. Lawton J; Hallowell N; Snowdon C; Norman JE; Carruthers K; Denison FC BMC Med Ethics; 2017 May; 18(1):36. PubMed ID: 28539111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Randomised trial of cord clamping at very preterm birth: outcomes at 2 years. Armstrong-Buisseret L; Powers K; Dorling J; Bradshaw L; Johnson S; Mitchell E; Duley L Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2020 May; 105(3):292-298. PubMed ID: 31371434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Parents' and clinicians' views on conducting paediatric diagnostic test accuracy studies without prior informed consent: qualitative insight from the Petechiae in Children study (PiC). Waterfield T; Lyttle MD; Shields M; Fairley D; Roland D; McKenna J; Woolfall K; Arch Dis Child; 2019 Oct; 104(10):979-983. PubMed ID: 31175126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimising informed consent for participants in a randomised controlled trial in rural Uganda: a comparative prospective cohort mixed-methods study. Ditai J; Kanyago J; Nambozo MR; Odeke NM; Abeso J; Dusabe-Richards J; Olupot-Olupot P; Carrol ED; Medina-Lara A; Gladstone M; Storr J; Faragher B; Weeks AD Trials; 2018 Dec; 19(1):699. PubMed ID: 30577809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Parental views on prospective consent: Experience from a pilot randomised trial recruiting extremely preterm infants during the perinatal period. Skelton H; Goyen TA; Viola P; Marceau J; D'Cruz D; Maheshwari R; Shah D; Edney B; Luig M; Jani PR J Paediatr Child Health; 2024 Oct; 60(10):561-568. PubMed ID: 39140358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of interventions for informed consent for randomised controlled trials (ELICIT): protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey. Gillies K; Entwistle V; Treweek SP; Fraser C; Williamson PR; Campbell MK Trials; 2015 Oct; 16():484. PubMed ID: 26507504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]