These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

560 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28447810)

  • 21. Distributional effects of word frequency on eye fixation durations.
    Staub A; White SJ; Drieghe D; Hollway EC; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1280-93. PubMed ID: 20873939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Re(de)fining the orthographic neighborhood: the role of addition and deletion neighbors in lexical decision and reading.
    Davis CJ; Perea M; Acha J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1550-70. PubMed ID: 19803656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. CompLex: an eye-movement database of compound word reading in English.
    Schmidtke D; Van Dyke JA; Kuperman V
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Feb; 53(1):59-77. PubMed ID: 32572845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The impact of word prevalence on lexical decision times: Evidence from the Dutch Lexicon Project 2.
    Brysbaert M; Stevens M; Mandera P; Keuleers E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Mar; 42(3):441-58. PubMed ID: 26501839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Lexical ambiguity, semantic context, and visual word recognition.
    Schvaneveldt RW; Meyer DE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 May; 2(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 1271030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Integration of parafoveal orthographic information during foveal word reading: beyond the sub-lexical level?
    Snell J; Vitu F; Grainger J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Oct; 70(10):1984-1996. PubMed ID: 27457807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Semantic Ambiguity: Do Multiple Meanings Inhibit or Facilitate Word Recognition?
    Haro J; Ferré P
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2018 Jun; 47(3):679-698. PubMed ID: 29280032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of semantic transparency on the processing of morphologically derived words: Evidence from decision latencies and event-related potentials.
    Jared D; Jouravlev O; Joanisse MF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Mar; 43(3):422-450. PubMed ID: 27685020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The influence of relatedness proportion on the joint relationship among word frequency, stimulus quality, and semantic priming in the lexical decision task.
    Aschenbrenner AJ; Yap MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Oct; 72(10):2452-2461. PubMed ID: 30947626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Context-Based Facilitation in Visual Word Recognition: Evidence for Visual and Lexical But Not Pre-Lexical Contributions.
    Eisenhauer S; Fiebach CJ; Gagl B
    eNeuro; 2019; 6(2):. PubMed ID: 31072907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation.
    Frost R; Forster KI; Deutsch A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Jul; 23(4):829-56. PubMed ID: 9265076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The role of semantic transparency in visual word recognition of compound words: A megastudy approach.
    Kim SY; Yap MJ; Goh WD
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Dec; 51(6):2722-2732. PubMed ID: 30291593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The time course of the lowercase advantage in visual word recognition: An ERP investigation.
    Vergara-Martínez M; Perea M; Leone-Fernandez B
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Sep; 146():107556. PubMed ID: 32682796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. From sound to meaning: Phonology-to-Semantics mapping in visual word recognition.
    Amenta S; Marelli M; Sulpizio S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):887-893. PubMed ID: 27572870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Interplay between morphology and frequency in lexical access: the case of the base frequency effect.
    Vannest J; Newport EL; Newman AJ; Bavelier D
    Brain Res; 2011 Feb; 1373():144-59. PubMed ID: 21167136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Compound reading in German: Effects of constituent frequency and whole-word frequency in children and adults.
    Hasenäcker J; Schroeder S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 May; 45(5):920-933. PubMed ID: 30024261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The time-course of lexical activation in Japanese morphographic word recognition: evidence for a character-driven processing model.
    Miwa K; Libben G; Dijkstra T; Baayen H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(1):79-113. PubMed ID: 23713954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects of emotional word semantics in reading Chinese sentences: evidence from eye movements.
    Yan M; Sommer W
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(4):1237-43. PubMed ID: 25581226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The speed of orthographic processing during lexical decision: electrophysiological evidence for independent coding of letter identity and letter position in visual word recognition.
    Mariol M; Jacques C; Schelstraete MA; Rossion B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1283-99. PubMed ID: 18284349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A Thousand Words Are Worth a Picture: Snapshots of Printed-Word Processing in an Event-Related Potential Megastudy.
    Dufau S; Grainger J; Midgley KJ; Holcomb PJ
    Psychol Sci; 2015 Dec; 26(12):1887-97. PubMed ID: 26525074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.