These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28447813)

  • 1. Using response time data to reduce testing time in cognitive tests.
    Bertling M; Weeks JP
    Psychol Assess; 2018 Mar; 30(3):328-338. PubMed ID: 28447813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A generalized linear factor model approach to the hierarchical framework for responses and response times.
    Molenaar D; Tuerlinckx F; van der Maas HL
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 May; 68(2):197-219. PubMed ID: 25109494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Calibration of the Test of Relational Reasoning.
    Dumas D; Alexander PA
    Psychol Assess; 2016 Oct; 28(10):1303-1318. PubMed ID: 26765927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of item response models for accuracy and speed of item responses with applications to adaptive testing.
    van Rijn PW; Ali US
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 May; 70(2):317-345. PubMed ID: 28474769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the Speed Sensitivity Parameter in the Lognormal Model for Response Times and Implications for High-Stakes Measurement Practice.
    Becker B; Debeer D; Weirich S; Goldhammer F
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2021 Sep; 45(6):407-422. PubMed ID: 34565944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating cognitive theory: a joint modeling approach using responses and response times.
    Klein Entink RH; Kuhn JT; Hornke LF; Fox JP
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Mar; 14(1):54-75. PubMed ID: 19271848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving precision of ability estimation: Getting more from response times.
    Bolsinova M; Tijmstra J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Feb; 71(1):13-38. PubMed ID: 28635139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A note on the hierarchical model for responses and response times in tests of van der Linden (2007).
    Ranger J
    Psychometrika; 2013 Jul; 78(3):538-44. PubMed ID: 25106399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysing model fit of psychometric process models: An overview, a new test and an application to the diffusion model.
    Ranger J; Kuhn JT; Szardenings C
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 May; 70(2):209-224. PubMed ID: 28474770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conditional reliability coefficients for test scores.
    Nicewander WA
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Jun; 23(2):351-362. PubMed ID: 28383949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cognitive psychology meets psychometric theory: on the relation between process models for decision making and latent variable models for individual differences.
    van der Maas HLJ; Molenaar D; Maris G; Kievit RA; Borsboom D
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Apr; 118(2):339-356. PubMed ID: 21401290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response moderation models for conditional dependence between response time and response accuracy.
    Bolsinova M; Tijmstra J; Molenaar D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 May; 70(2):257-279. PubMed ID: 27618470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using Response Times to Model Not-Reached Items due to Time Limits.
    Pohl S; Ulitzsch E; von Davier M
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):892-920. PubMed ID: 31054065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing five depression measures in depressed Chinese patients using item response theory: an examination of item properties, measurement precision and score comparability.
    Zhao Y; Chan W; Lo BC
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Apr; 15(1):60. PubMed ID: 28372559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Interest of a new instrument to assess cognition in schizophrenia: The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS)].
    Bralet MC; Navarre M; Eskenazi AM; Lucas-Ross M; Falissard B
    Encephale; 2008 Dec; 34(6):557-62. PubMed ID: 19081451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling Differences Between Response Times of Correct and Incorrect Responses.
    Bolsinova M; Tijmstra J
    Psychometrika; 2019 Dec; 84(4):1018-1046. PubMed ID: 31463656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Developing a fluid intelligence scale through a combination of Rasch modeling and cognitive psychology.
    Primi R
    Psychol Assess; 2014 Sep; 26(3):774-88. PubMed ID: 24773034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The psychometric properties of the "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test: an item response theory (IRT) analysis.
    Preti A; Vellante M; Petretto DR
    Cogn Neuropsychiatry; 2017 May; 22(3):233-253. PubMed ID: 28288549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cognitive diagnosis modelling incorporating item response times.
    Zhan P; Jiao H; Liao D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):262-286. PubMed ID: 28872185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A proposal for evaluating cognition in assertiveness.
    Vagos P; Pereira A
    Psychol Assess; 2010 Sep; 22(3):657-65. PubMed ID: 20822278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.