BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28448399)

  • 1. Quality Assessment of Meta-analyses Published in Leading Anesthesiology Journals From 2005 to 2014.
    Hall AM; Lee S; Zurakowski D
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Jun; 124(6):2063-2067. PubMed ID: 28448399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality Assessment of Studies Published in Open Access and Subscription Journals: Results of a Systematic Evaluation.
    Pastorino R; Milovanovic S; Stojanovic J; Efremov L; Amore R; Boccia S
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0154217. PubMed ID: 27167982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews on tuberculosis.
    Nicolau I; Ling D; Tian L; Lienhardt C; Pai M
    Int J Tuberc Lung Dis; 2013 Sep; 17(9):1160-9. PubMed ID: 23809432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Publication Bias and Nonreporting Found in Majority of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Anesthesiology Journals.
    Hedin RJ; Umberham BA; Detweiler BN; Kollmorgen L; Vassar M
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Oct; 123(4):1018-25. PubMed ID: 27537925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Systematic Reviews in Sports Medicine.
    DiSilvestro KJ; Tjoumakaris FP; Maltenfort MG; Spindler KP; Freedman KB
    Am J Sports Med; 2016 Feb; 44(2):533-8. PubMed ID: 25899433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Highest Ranking Journals in the Field of Pain.
    Riado Minguez D; Kowalski M; Vallve Odena M; Longin Pontzen D; Jelicic Kadic A; Jeric M; Dosenovic S; Jakus D; Vrdoljak M; Poklepovic Pericic T; Sapunar D; Puljak L
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1348-1354. PubMed ID: 28678074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The assessment of publication quality.
    Bo LL; Li JB; Deng XM
    Anesth Analg; 2008 May; 106(5):1589-90; author reply 1590. PubMed ID: 18420890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
    Gagnier JJ; Kellam PJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e771-7. PubMed ID: 23780547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality of meta-analyses in major leading orthopedics journals: A systematic review.
    Zhi X; Zhang Z; Cui J; Zhai X; Chen X; Su J
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Dec; 103(8):1141-1146. PubMed ID: 28928047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses available for bovine and equine veterinarians and quality of abstract reporting: A scoping review.
    Buczinski S; Ferraro S; Vandeweerd JM
    Prev Vet Med; 2018 Dec; 161():50-59. PubMed ID: 30466658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in pediatric surgery.
    Salim A; Mullassery D; Losty PD
    J Pediatr Surg; 2017 Nov; 52(11):1732-1735. PubMed ID: 28830620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The landscape of systematic reviews in urology (1998 to 2015): an assessment of methodological quality.
    Han JL; Gandhi S; Bockoven CG; Narayan VM; Dahm P
    BJU Int; 2017 Apr; 119(4):638-649. PubMed ID: 27611722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scientific publications in anesthesiology journals from mainland China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong: a 10-year survey of the literature.
    Li Z; Shi J; Liao Z; Wu FX; Yang LQ; Yu WF
    Anesth Analg; 2010 Mar; 110(3):918-21. PubMed ID: 19955511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reporting and methodologic evaluation of meta-analyses published in the anesthesia literature according to AMSTAR and PRISMA checklists: a preliminary study.
    Oh JH; Shin WJ; Park S; Chung JS
    Korean J Anesthesiol; 2017 Aug; 70(4):446-455. PubMed ID: 28794841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An analysis of review articles published in four anaesthesia journals.
    Smith AF
    Can J Anaesth; 1997 Apr; 44(4):405-9. PubMed ID: 9104524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improvement in the quality of randomized controlled trials among general anesthesiology journals 2000 to 2006: a 6-year follow-up.
    Greenfield ML; Mhyre JM; Mashour GA; Blum JM; Yen EC; Rosenberg AL
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Jun; 108(6):1916-21. PubMed ID: 19448222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality of meta-analyses in major leading gastroenterology and hepatology journals: A systematic review.
    Liu P; Qiu Y; Qian Y; Chen X; Wang Y; Cui J; Zhai X
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 Jan; 32(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 27600190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methodological Rigor and Temporal Trends of Cardiovascular Medicine Meta-Analyses in Highest-Impact Journals.
    Mahtta D; Altibi A; Gad MM; Samara A; Barakat AF; Bagur R; Mansoor H; Jneid H; Virani SS; Mamas MA; Masri A; Elgendy IY
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2021 Sep; 10(18):e021367. PubMed ID: 34533035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. China's Contribution to Anesthesiology Research: A 10-Year Survey of the Literature.
    Xie G; Zhang K; Wood C; Hoeft A; Liu J; Fang X
    Anesth Analg; 2016 May; 122(5):1640-5. PubMed ID: 27003916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inflammatory bowel disease meta-evidence and its challenges: is it time to restructure surgical research?
    Delaney J; Laws P; Wille-Jørgensen P; Engel A
    Colorectal Dis; 2015 Jul; 17(7):600-11. PubMed ID: 25546572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.