219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28448399)
21. Academic Journals Assessed as Springboards for New Developments: A Study of Leading Anesthesia Journals Over Past 50 Years.
Kissin I
J Anesth Hist; 2019 Jan; 5(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 30922538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Quality appraisal of systematic reviews or meta-analysis on traditional Chinese medicine published in Chinese journals].
Liu JP; Xia Y
Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi; 2007 Apr; 27(4):306-11. PubMed ID: 17526167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in leading orthodontic journals: a quality paradigm?
Fleming PS; Seehra J; Polychronopoulou A; Fedorowicz Z; Pandis N
Eur J Orthod; 2013 Apr; 35(2):244-8. PubMed ID: 22510325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on psoriasis: role of funding sources, conflict of interest and bibliometric indices as predictors of methodological quality.
Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Gay-Mimbrera J; Maestre-Lopez B; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Carmona-Fernández PJ; González-Padilla M; Vélez García-Nieto A; Isla-Tejera B
Br J Dermatol; 2017 Jun; 176(6):1633-1644. PubMed ID: 28192600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Methodological Quality Assessment of Meta-analyses in Endodontics.
Kattan S; Lee SM; Kohli MR; Setzer FC; Karabucak B
J Endod; 2018 Jan; 44(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 29032820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Misuse of standard error of the mean (SEM) when reporting variability of a sample. A critical evaluation of four anaesthesia journals.
Nagele P
Br J Anaesth; 2003 Apr; 90(4):514-6. PubMed ID: 12644429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Quality assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in Saudi journals from 1997 to 2017.
Natto ZS; AlGhamdi DS
Saudi Med J; 2019 May; 40(5):426-431. PubMed ID: 31056617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. CONSORT item adherence in top ranked anaesthesiology journals in 2011: a retrospective analysis.
Münter NH; Stevanovic A; Rossaint R; Stoppe C; Sanders RD; Coburn M
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2015 Feb; 32(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 25387297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. How evidence-based are publications in clinical ophthalmic journals?
Lai TY; Leung GM; Wong VW; Lam RF; Cheng AC; Lam DS
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 May; 47(5):1831-8. PubMed ID: 16638988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Quality and reporting of trial design in scientific papers in Anaesthesia over 25 years.
Langford RA; Huang GH; Leslie K
Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 19032695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Writing the abstract: completeness and accuracy matter.
von Elm E
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Jul; 28(7):483-4. PubMed ID: 21659806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials?
Poolman RW; Struijs PA; Krips R; Sierevelt IN; Lutz KH; Bhandari M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Sep; 6():44. PubMed ID: 16965628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Do orthopaedic journals provide high-quality evidence for clinical practice?
Kiter E; Karatosun V; Günal I
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2003 Apr; 123(2-3):82-5. PubMed ID: 12721685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Methodological tools and sensitivity analysis for assessing quality or risk of bias used in systematic reviews published in the high-impact anesthesiology journals.
Marušić MF; Fidahić M; Cepeha CM; Farcaș LG; Tseke A; Puljak L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 May; 20(1):121. PubMed ID: 32423382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Reporting and Methodology of Multivariable Analyses in Prognostic Observational Studies Published in 4 Anesthesiology Journals: A Methodological Descriptive Review.
Guglielminotti J; Dechartres A; Mentré F; Montravers P; Longrois D; Laouénan C
Anesth Analg; 2015 Oct; 121(4):1011-1029. PubMed ID: 25390276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Methodological quality of meta-analyses of single-case experimental studies.
Jamshidi L; Heyvaert M; Declercq L; Fernández-Castilla B; Ferron JM; Moeyaert M; Beretvas SN; Onghena P; Van den Noortgate W
Res Dev Disabil; 2018 Aug; 79():97-115. PubMed ID: 29289406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Accuracy of subject and author indexes in five anaesthesia journals.
Sarantopoulos C; Fassoulaki A
Br J Anaesth; 1995 Jan; 74(1):104-6. PubMed ID: 7880687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. National representation in the anaesthesia literature: a bibliometric analysis of highly cited anaesthesia journals.
Bould MD; Boet S; Riem N; Kasanda C; Sossou A; Bruppacher HR
Anaesthesia; 2010 Aug; 65(8):799-804. PubMed ID: 20586744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Is quality and completeness of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in high impact radiology journals associated with citation rates?
van der Pol CB; McInnes MD; Petrcich W; Tunis AS; Hanna R
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0119892. PubMed ID: 25775455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
