193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28448851)
1. Accurate 3D reconstruction of bony surfaces using ultrasonic synthetic aperture techniques for robotic knee arthroplasty.
Kerr W; Rowe P; Pierce SG
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2017 Jun; 58():23-32. PubMed ID: 28448851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigation of synthetic aperture methods in ultrasound surface imaging using elementary surface types.
Kerr W; Pierce SG; Rowe P
Ultrasonics; 2016 Dec; 72():165-76. PubMed ID: 27552482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 2D/3D reconstruction of the distal femur using statistical shape models addressing personalized surgical instruments in knee arthroplasty: A feasibility analysis.
Cerveri P; Sacco C; Olgiati G; Manzotti A; Baroni G
Int J Med Robot; 2017 Dec; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 28387436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Current state of computer navigation and robotics in unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
van der List JP; Chawla H; Joskowicz L; Pearle AD
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Nov; 24(11):3482-3495. PubMed ID: 27600634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: is robotic technology more accurate than conventional technique?
Citak M; Suero EM; Citak M; Dunbar NJ; Branch SH; Conditt MA; Banks SA; Pearle AD
Knee; 2013 Aug; 20(4):268-71. PubMed ID: 23201147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional A-mode ultrasound calibration and registration for robotic orthopaedic knee surgery.
Mozes A; Chang TC; Arata L; Zhao W
Int J Med Robot; 2010 Mar; 6(1):91-101. PubMed ID: 20014154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Collaborative Robotic Wire + Arc Additive Manufacture and Sensor-Enabled In-Process Ultrasonic Non-Destructive Evaluation.
Zimermann R; Mohseni E; Vasilev M; Loukas C; Vithanage RKW; Macleod CN; Lines D; Javadi Y; Espirindio E Silva MP; Fitzpatrick S; Halavage S; Mckegney S; Pierce SG; Williams S; Ding J
Sensors (Basel); 2022 May; 22(11):. PubMed ID: 35684823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 3D templating and patient-specific cutting guides (Knee-Plan) in total knee arthroplasty: postoperative CT-based assessment of implant positioning.
Franceschi JP; Sbihi A;
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2014 Oct; 100(6 Suppl):S281-6. PubMed ID: 25175982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment.
Moon YW; Ha CW; Do KH; Kim CY; Han JH; Na SE; Lee CH; Kim JG; Park YS
Comput Aided Surg; 2012; 17(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 22348661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Alignment of the lower extremity mechanical axis by computer-aided design and application in total knee arthroplasty.
Zhang YZ; Lu S; Zhang HQ; Jin ZM; Zhao JM; Huang J; Zhang ZF
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Oct; 11(10):1881-90. PubMed ID: 27017501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional analysis of accuracy of component positioning in total knee arthroplasty with patient specific and conventional instruments: A randomized controlled trial.
De Vloo R; Pellikaan P; Dhollander A; Vander Sloten J
Knee; 2017 Dec; 24(6):1469-1477. PubMed ID: 28943039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Evolution of Image-Free Robotic Assistance in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.
Lonner JH; Moretti VM
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2016; 45(4):249-54. PubMed ID: 27327917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predicted osteotomy planes are accurate when using patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty in cadavers: a descriptive analysis.
Kievit AJ; Dobbe JGG; Streekstra GJ; Blankevoort L; Schafroth MU
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 Jun; 26(6):1751-1758. PubMed ID: 28948339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Skeletal landmarks for TKR implantations: evaluation of their accuracy using EOS imaging acquisition system.
Schlatterer B; Suedhoff I; Bonnet X; Catonne Y; Maestro M; Skalli W
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Feb; 95(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 19251231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of TACT to the evaluation of total joint arthroplasty.
Fahey FH; Webber RL; Chew FS; Dickerson BA
Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):454-60. PubMed ID: 12674247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intraoperative application of hand-held structured light scanning: a feasibility study.
Chan B; Auyeung J; Rudan JF; Ellis RE; Kunz M
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Jun; 11(6):1101-8. PubMed ID: 27017498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic-Assisted Knee Arthroplasty: An Overview.
van der List JP; Chawla H; Pearle AD
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2016; 45(4):202-11. PubMed ID: 27327911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Deep learning approach for guiding three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction of lower limbs for robotically-assisted total knee arthroplasty.
Li Z; Zhang X; Ding L; Du K; Yan J; Chan MTV; Wu WKK; Li S
Int J Med Robot; 2021 Oct; 17(5):e2300. PubMed ID: 34109730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy assessment of Tri-plane B-mode ultrasound for non-invasive 3D kinematic analysis of knee joints.
Masum MA; Pickering M; Lambert A; Scarvell J; Smith P
Biomed Eng Online; 2014 Aug; 13():122. PubMed ID: 25159051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotically Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty with a Handheld Image-Free Sculpting Tool.
Lonner JH
Orthop Clin North Am; 2016 Jan; 47(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 26614918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
