BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28449106)

  • 21. e-DNA meta-barcoding: from NGS raw data to taxonomic profiling.
    Bruno F; Marinella M; Santamaria M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1269():257-78. PubMed ID: 25577384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Microbial community analysis using high-throughput sequencing technology: a beginner's guide for microbiologists.
    Jo J; Oh J; Park C
    J Microbiol; 2020 Mar; 58(3):176-192. PubMed ID: 32108314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparative metagenomic analysis of human gut microbiome composition using two different bioinformatic pipelines.
    D'Argenio V; Casaburi G; Precone V; Salvatore F
    Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():325340. PubMed ID: 24719854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A review of methods and databases for metagenomic classification and assembly.
    Breitwieser FP; Lu J; Salzberg SL
    Brief Bioinform; 2019 Jul; 20(4):1125-1136. PubMed ID: 29028872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. BMPOS: a Flexible and User-Friendly Tool Sets for Microbiome Studies.
    Pylro VS; Morais DK; de Oliveira FS; Dos Santos FG; Lemos LN; Oliveira G; Roesch LF
    Microb Ecol; 2016 Aug; 72(2):443-7. PubMed ID: 27220974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. MetaComp: comprehensive analysis software for comparative meta-omics including comparative metagenomics.
    Zhai P; Yang L; Guo X; Wang Z; Guo J; Wang X; Zhu H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Oct; 18(1):434. PubMed ID: 28969605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. animalcules: interactive microbiome analytics and visualization in R.
    Zhao Y; Federico A; Faits T; Manimaran S; Segrè D; Monti S; Johnson WE
    Microbiome; 2021 Mar; 9(1):76. PubMed ID: 33775256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Phylogeny-based classification of microbial communities.
    Tanaseichuk O; Borneman J; Jiang T
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Feb; 30(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 24369151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Instruction of microbiome taxonomic profiling based on 16S rRNA sequencing.
    Kim H; Kim S; Jung S
    J Microbiol; 2020 Mar; 58(3):193-205. PubMed ID: 32108315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Interactive Web-Based Services for Metagenomic Data Analysis and Comparisons.
    Abdelsalam NA; Elshora H; El-Hadidi M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2649():133-174. PubMed ID: 37258861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Review of the Current State of Freely Accessible Web Tools for the Analysis of 16S rRNA Sequencing of the Gut Microbiome.
    Ibal JC; Park YJ; Park MK; Lee J; Kim MC; Shin JH
    Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Sep; 23(18):. PubMed ID: 36142775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bioinformatic and Statistical Analysis of Microbiome Data.
    Kim Y
    Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2629():183-229. PubMed ID: 36929079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Vikodak--A Modular Framework for Inferring Functional Potential of Microbial Communities from 16S Metagenomic Datasets.
    Nagpal S; Haque MM; Mande SS
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148347. PubMed ID: 26848568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. PyPathway: Python Package for Biological Network Analysis and Visualization.
    Xu Y; Luo XC
    J Comput Biol; 2018 May; 25(5):499-504. PubMed ID: 29641230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Intrinsic challenges in ancient microbiome reconstruction using 16S rRNA gene amplification.
    Ziesemer KA; Mann AE; Sankaranarayanan K; Schroeder H; Ozga AT; Brandt BW; Zaura E; Waters-Rist A; Hoogland M; Salazar-García DC; Aldenderfer M; Speller C; Hendy J; Weston DA; MacDonald SJ; Thomas GH; Collins MJ; Lewis CM; Hofman C; Warinner C
    Sci Rep; 2015 Nov; 5():16498. PubMed ID: 26563586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Parallel-META 3: Comprehensive taxonomical and functional analysis platform for efficient comparison of microbial communities.
    Jing G; Sun Z; Wang H; Gong Y; Huang S; Ning K; Xu J; Su X
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jan; 7():40371. PubMed ID: 28079128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. FMAP: Functional Mapping and Analysis Pipeline for metagenomics and metatranscriptomics studies.
    Kim J; Kim MS; Koh AY; Xie Y; Zhan X
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):420. PubMed ID: 27724866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dadaist2: A Toolkit to Automate and Simplify Statistical Analysis and Plotting of Metabarcoding Experiments.
    Ansorge R; Birolo G; James SA; Telatin A
    Int J Mol Sci; 2021 May; 22(10):. PubMed ID: 34069990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The truth about metagenomics: quantifying and counteracting bias in 16S rRNA studies.
    Brooks JP; Edwards DJ; Harwich MD; Rivera MC; Fettweis JM; Serrano MG; Reris RA; Sheth NU; Huang B; Girerd P; ; Strauss JF; Jefferson KK; Buck GA
    BMC Microbiol; 2015 Mar; 15():66. PubMed ID: 25880246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Optimisation of methods for bacterial skin microbiome investigation: primer selection and comparison of the 454 versus MiSeq platform.
    Castelino M; Eyre S; Moat J; Fox G; Martin P; Ho P; Upton M; Barton A
    BMC Microbiol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 28109256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 67.