These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28449317)

  • 1. A comparison of individual-based genetic distance metrics for landscape genetics.
    Shirk AJ; Landguth EL; Cushman SA
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Nov; 17(6):1308-1317. PubMed ID: 28449317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of regression methods for model selection in individual-based landscape genetic analysis.
    Shirk AJ; Landguth EL; Cushman SA
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 Jan; 18(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 28796434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of partial statistics in individual-based landscape genetics.
    Kierepka EM; Latch EK
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2015 May; 15(3):512-25. PubMed ID: 25230016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Phylin 2.0: Extending the phylogeographical interpolation method to include uncertainty and user-defined distance metrics.
    Tarroso P; Carvalho SB; Velo-Antón G
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Jul; 19(4):1081-1094. PubMed ID: 30873736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantifying uncertainty in inferences of landscape genetic resistance due to choice of individual-based genetic distance metric.
    Beninde J; Wittische J; Frantz AC
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 Jan; 24(1):e13831. PubMed ID: 37475166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Landscape genetics in a changing world: disentangling historical and contemporary influences and inferring change.
    Epps CW; Keyghobadi N
    Mol Ecol; 2015 Dec; 24(24):6021-40. PubMed ID: 26547281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantifying the lag time to detect barriers in landscape genetics.
    Landguth EL; Cushman SA; Schwartz MK; McKelvey KS; Murphy M; Luikart G
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Oct; 19(19):4179-91. PubMed ID: 20819159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. landgenreport: a new r function to simplify landscape genetic analysis using resistance surface layers.
    Gruber B; Adamack AT
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2015 Sep; 15(5):1172-8. PubMed ID: 25644761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relationship between least-cost and resistance distance.
    Marrotte RR; Bowman J
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0174212. PubMed ID: 28350863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simulating natural selection in landscape genetics.
    Landguth EL; Cushman SA; Johnson NA
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2012 Mar; 12(2):363-8. PubMed ID: 21951716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Landscape genetics of a pollinator longhorn beetle [Typocerus v. velutinus (Olivier)] on a continuous habitat surface.
    Abdel Moniem HE; Schemerhorn BJ; DeWoody JA; Holland JD
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Oct; 25(20):5015-5028. PubMed ID: 27552358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Isolation by distance, resistance and/or clusters? Lessons learned from a forest-dwelling carnivore inhabiting a heterogeneous landscape.
    Ruiz-Gonzalez A; Cushman SA; Madeira MJ; Randi E; Gómez-Moliner BJ
    Mol Ecol; 2015 Oct; 24(20):5110-29. PubMed ID: 26394893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Alternative Quantifications of Landscape Complementation to Model Gene Flow in Banded Longhorn Beetles [
    Borthwick R; de Flamingh A; Hesselbarth MHK; Parandhaman A; Wagner HH; Abdel Moniem HEM
    Front Genet; 2020; 11():307. PubMed ID: 32296465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inferring landscape effects on dispersal from genetic distances: how far can we go?
    Jaquiéry J; Broquet T; Hirzel AH; Yearsley J; Perrin N
    Mol Ecol; 2011 Feb; 20(4):692-705. PubMed ID: 21175906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysing landscape effects on dispersal networks and gene flow with genetic graphs.
    Savary P; Foltête JC; Moal H; Vuidel G; Garnier S
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2021 May; 21(4):1167-1185. PubMed ID: 33460526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Landscape modelling of gene flow: improved power using conditional genetic distance derived from the topology of population networks.
    Dyer RJ; Nason JD; Garrick RC
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Sep; 19(17):3746-59. PubMed ID: 20723052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fragmentation of Atlantic forest has not affected gene flow of a widespread seed-dispersing bat.
    McCulloch ES; Tello JS; Whitehead A; Rolón-Mendoza CM; Maldonado-Rodríguez MC; Stevens RD
    Mol Ecol; 2013 Sep; 22(18):4619-33. PubMed ID: 23909879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using simulations to evaluate Mantel-based methods for assessing landscape resistance to gene flow.
    Zeller KA; Creech TG; Millette KL; Crowhurst RS; Long RA; Wagner HH; Balkenhol N; Landguth EL
    Ecol Evol; 2016 Jun; 6(12):4115-28. PubMed ID: 27516868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating methods to visualize patterns of genetic differentiation on a landscape.
    House GL; Hahn MW
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 May; 18(3):448-460. PubMed ID: 29282875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. One metric or many? Refining the analytical framework of landscape resistance estimation in individual-based landscape genetic analyses.
    Peterman WE
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 Jan; 24(1):e13876. PubMed ID: 37819681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.