These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28449329)

  • 1. Valuing productivity costs using the friction-cost approach: Estimating friction-period estimates by occupational classifications for the UK.
    Kigozi J; Jowett S; Lewis M; Barton P; Coast J
    Health Econ; 2017 Dec; 26(12):1862-1868. PubMed ID: 28449329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The friction-cost method : replacement for nothing and leisure for free?
    Brouwer WB; Koopmanschap MA
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2005; 23(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 15748085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The friction cost method: a comment.
    Johannesson M; Karlsson G
    J Health Econ; 1997 Apr; 16(2):249-55; discussion 257-9. PubMed ID: 10173080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Valuing productivity costs in a changing macroeconomic environment: the estimation of colorectal cancer productivity costs using the friction cost approach.
    Hanly P; Koopmanschap M; Sharp L
    Eur J Health Econ; 2016 Jun; 17(5):553-61. PubMed ID: 26022915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Productivity Losses Associated with Head and Neck Cancer Using the Human Capital and Friction Cost Approaches.
    Pearce AM; Hanly P; Timmons A; Walsh PM; O'Neill C; O'Sullivan E; Gooberman-Hill R; Thomas AA; Gallagher P; Sharp L
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2015 Aug; 13(4):359-67. PubMed ID: 25691128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How to estimate productivity costs in economic evaluations.
    Krol M; Brouwer W
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2014 Apr; 32(4):335-44. PubMed ID: 24504850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Advances in the methodological approach to friction period estimation: A European perspective.
    Hanly P; Ortega Ortega M; Pearce A; Soerjomataram I; Sharp L
    Soc Sci Med; 2020 Nov; 264():113289. PubMed ID: 32836019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Friction-cost method as an alternative to the human-capital approach in calculating indirect costs.
    Birnbaum H
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2005; 23(2):103-4. PubMed ID: 15748084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating productivity costs using the friction cost approach in practice: a systematic review.
    Kigozi J; Jowett S; Lewis M; Barton P; Coast J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2016 Jan; 17(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 25387561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating Global Friction Periods for Economic Evaluation: A Case Study of Selected OECD Member Countries.
    Hanly P; Ortega Ortega M; Pearce A; de Camargo Cancela M; Soerjomataram I; Sharp L
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2023 Sep; 41(9):1093-1101. PubMed ID: 37036642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Productivity cost calculations in health economic evaluations: correcting for compensation mechanisms and multiplier effects.
    Krol M; Brouwer WB; Severens JL; Kaper J; Evers SM
    Soc Sci Med; 2012 Dec; 75(11):1981-8. PubMed ID: 22925428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Productivity costs before and after absence from work: as important as common?
    Brouwer WB; van Exel NJ; Koopmanschap MA; Rutten FF
    Health Policy; 2002 Aug; 61(2):173-87. PubMed ID: 12088890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The economic burden of coronary heart disease in the UK.
    Liu JL; Maniadakis N; Gray A; Rayner M
    Heart; 2002 Dec; 88(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 12433888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Regional economic activity and absenteeism: a new approach to estimating the indirect costs of employee productivity loss.
    Bankert B; Coberley C; Pope JE; Wells A
    Popul Health Manag; 2015 Feb; 18(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 25029607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variation in the methodological approach to productivity cost valuation: the case of prostate cancer.
    Hanly P; Maguire R; Drummond F; Sharp L
    Eur J Health Econ; 2019 Dec; 20(9):1399-1408. PubMed ID: 31444674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The friction cost method for measuring indirect costs of disease.
    Koopmanschap MA; Rutten FF; van Ineveld BM; van Roijen L
    J Health Econ; 1995 Jun; 14(2):171-89. PubMed ID: 10154656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast and prostate cancer productivity costs: a comparison of the human capital approach and the friction cost approach.
    Hanly P; Timmons A; Walsh PM; Sharp L
    Value Health; 2012 May; 15(3):429-36. PubMed ID: 22583452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Friction Cost Estimates of Productivity Costs in Cost-of-Illness Studies in Comparison with Human Capital Estimates: A Review.
    Pike J; Grosse SD
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2018 Dec; 16(6):765-778. PubMed ID: 30094591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating the Societal Benefits of THA After Accounting for Work Status and Productivity: A Markov Model Approach.
    Koenig L; Zhang Q; Austin MS; Demiralp B; Fehring TK; Feng C; Mather RC; Nguyen JT; Saavoss A; Springer BD; Yates AJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Dec; 474(12):2645-2654. PubMed ID: 27699631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adjusted productivity costs of stroke by human capital and friction cost methods: a Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 study.
    Rissanen I; Ala-Mursula L; Nerg I; Korhonen M
    Eur J Health Econ; 2021 Jun; 22(4):531-545. PubMed ID: 33625624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.