These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
9. Leadless left ventricular endocardial pacing for CRT upgrades in previously failed and high-risk patients in comparison with coronary sinus CRT upgrades. Sidhu BS; Sieniewicz B; Gould J; Elliott MK; Mehta VS; Betts TR; James S; Turley AJ; Butter C; Seifert M; Boersma LVA; Riahi S; Neuzil P; Biffi M; Diemberger I; Vergara P; Arnold M; Keane DT; Defaye P; Deharo JC; Chow A; Schilling R; Behar JM; Leclercq C; Auricchio A; Niederer SA; Rinaldi CA Europace; 2021 Oct; 23(10):1577-1585. PubMed ID: 34322707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electrically guided versus imaging-guided implant of the left ventricular lead in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a study protocol for a double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial (ElectroCRT). Stephansen C; Sommer A; Kronborg MB; Jensen JM; Bouchelouche K; Nielsen JC Trials; 2018 Nov; 19(1):600. PubMed ID: 30382923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Benefits of left ventricular endocardial pacing comparing failed implants and prior non-responders to conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy: A subanalysis from the ALSYNC study. Biffi M; Defaye P; Jaïs P; Ruffa F; Leclercq C; Gras D; Yang Z; Gerritse B; Ziacchi M; Morgan JM; Int J Cardiol; 2018 May; 259():88-93. PubMed ID: 29579617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Feasibility of leadless left ventricular septal pacing with the WiSE-CRT system to target the left bundle branch area: A porcine model and multicenter patient experience. Elliott MK; Vergara P; Wijesuriya N; Mehta VS; Bosco P; Jacon P; Lee M; Taloni S; Niederer S; Alison J; Piot O; Roberts PR; Paisey J; Defaye P; Shute A; Rinaldi CA Heart Rhythm; 2022 Dec; 19(12):1974-1983. PubMed ID: 35940464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Right ventricular septal pacing as alternative for failed left ventricular lead implantation in cardiac resynchronization therapy candidates. Alhous MH; Small GR; Hannah A; Hillis GS; Frenneaux M; Broadhurst PA Europace; 2015 Jan; 17(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 25359384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Application and efficacy of the adjustment on left ventricular electrical delay and the distance between right and left ventricular pacing polar in optimizing the left ventricular pacing polar]. Yan XL; Liang YC; Yu HB; Xu BG; Gao Y; Liu R; Xu GQ; Wu M Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2020 Aug; 48(8):669-674. PubMed ID: 32847323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Leadless endocardial ultrasound based left ventricular stimulation : WISE CRT System: alternative to conventional methods]. Butter C; Fehrendt S; Möller V; Seifert M Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol; 2018 Dec; 29(4):340-348. PubMed ID: 30406825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Guidance for Optimal Site Selection of a Leadless Left Ventricular Endocardial Electrode Improves Acute Hemodynamic Response and Chronic Remodeling. Sieniewicz BJ; Behar JM; Gould J; Claridge S; Porter B; Sidhu BS; Niederer S; Betts TR; Webster D; James S; Turley AJ; Rinaldi CA JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2018 Jul; 4(7):860-868. PubMed ID: 30025684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acute hemodynamic effect of left ventricular endocardial pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy: assessment by pressure-volume loops. Padeletti L; Pieragnoli P; Ricciardi G; Perrotta L; Grifoni G; Porciani MC; Lionetti V; Valsecchi S Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2012 Jun; 5(3):460-7. PubMed ID: 22589286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Device pacing diagnostics overestimate effective cardiac resynchronization therapy pacing results of the hOLter for Efficacy analysis of CRT (OLÉ CRT) study. Hernández-Madrid A; Facchin D; Klepfer RN; Ghosh S; Matía R; Moreno J; Locatelli A Heart Rhythm; 2017 Apr; 14(4):541-547. PubMed ID: 28104482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Direct left ventricular endocardial pacing: an alternative when traditional resynchronization via coronary sinus is not feasible or effective. Moriña-Vázquez P; Roa-Garrido J; Fernández-Gómez JM; Venegas-Gamero J; Pichardo RB; Carranza MH Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2013 Jun; 36(6):699-706. PubMed ID: 23521222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]