These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28450974)

  • 1. Response Preparation, Response Conflict, and the Effects of Irrelevant Flanker Stimuli.
    Wühr P; Heuer H
    Adv Cogn Psychol; 2017; 13(1):70-82. PubMed ID: 28450974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response Preparation With Reliable Cues Decreases Response Competition in the Flanker Task.
    Wühr P; Frings C; Heuer H
    Exp Psychol; 2018 Sep; 65(5):286-296. PubMed ID: 30232937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conflict Adaptation and Cue Competition during Learning in an Eriksen Flanker Task.
    Ghinescu R; Schachtman TR; Ramsey AK; Gratton G; Fabiani M
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0167119. PubMed ID: 27941977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response preparation modulates interference from irrelevant spatial information.
    Wühr P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jun; 122(2):206-20. PubMed ID: 16466683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conflict-frequency affects flanker interference: role of stimulus-ensemble-specific practiceand flanker-response contingencies.
    Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(3):206-17. PubMed ID: 19289363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Opposing influences on conflict-driven adaptation in the Eriksen flanker task.
    Bugg JM
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Oct; 36(7):1217-27. PubMed ID: 18927038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of reward in the Simon task: Differences and similarities to the Stroop and Eriksen flanker tasks.
    Mittelstädt V; Ulrich R; König J; Hofbauer K; Mackenzie IG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):949-959. PubMed ID: 36316615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamics of attentional focusing in the Eriksen flanker task.
    Servant M; Logan GD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2710-2721. PubMed ID: 31250363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Learned Irrelevance and Cue Competition Using an Eriksen Flanker Task.
    Tapia M; Meyers K; Richardson R; Ghinescu R; Schachtman TR
    Exp Psychol; 2016 Sep; 63(5):287-296. PubMed ID: 27832732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A bimodal extension of the Eriksen flanker task.
    Ulrich R; Prislan L; Miller J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Feb; 83(2):790-799. PubMed ID: 33179215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. fMRI-constrained source analysis reveals early top-down modulations of interference processing using a flanker task.
    Siemann J; Herrmann M; Galashan D
    Neuroimage; 2016 Aug; 136():45-56. PubMed ID: 27181762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conditional accuracy in response interference tasks: Evidence from the Eriksen flanker task and the spatial conflict task.
    Stins JF; Polderman JC; Boomsma DI; de Geus EJ
    Adv Cogn Psychol; 2008 Jul; 3(3):409-17. PubMed ID: 20517524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distance and ratio effects in the flanker task are due to different mechanisms.
    Mattler U
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Oct; 59(10):1745-63. PubMed ID: 16945858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transition from reactive control to proactive control across conflict adaptation: An sLORETA study.
    Suzuki K; Shinoda H
    Brain Cogn; 2015 Nov; 100():7-14. PubMed ID: 26432378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attentional control adjustments in Eriksen and Stroop task performance can be independent of response conflict.
    Lamers MJ; Roelofs A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1056-81. PubMed ID: 21113864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strategic behavior without awareness? Effects of implicit learning in the Eriksen flanker paradigm.
    Ghinescu R; Schachtman TR; Stadler MA; Fabiani M; Gratton G
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Mar; 38(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 20173192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The modulation of expectation violation on attention: Evidence from the spatial cueing effects.
    Chen L; Zhu P; Li J; Song H; Liu H; Shen M; Chen H
    Cognition; 2023 Sep; 238():105488. PubMed ID: 37178591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Precueing spatial S-R correspondence: is there regulation of expected response conflict?
    Wühr P; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):872-83. PubMed ID: 18665732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Childhood Maltreatment Modulates the Impact of Negative Emotional Stimuli on Conflict Resolution.
    Meng X; Gao S; Liu W; Zhang L; Suo T; Li H
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():845. PubMed ID: 31105614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Twisting tongues to test for conflict-monitoring in speech production.
    Acheson DJ; Hagoort P
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():206. PubMed ID: 24795592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.