These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28451737)

  • 1. Effects of malocclusions on facial attractiveness and their correlations with the divine proportion.
    Akan S; Torgut AG; Oktay H
    J Orofac Orthop; 2017 Sep; 78(5):427-436. PubMed ID: 28451737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the Divine Proportion in the facial profile of young females.
    Jahanbin A; Basafa M; Alizadeh Y
    Indian J Dent Res; 2008; 19(4):292-6. PubMed ID: 19075430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Divine proportions in attractive and nonattractive faces.
    Pancherz H; Knapp V; Erbe C; Heiss AM
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 20209174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Facial aesthetics and the divine proportion: a comparison of surgical and non-surgical class II treatment.
    Shell TL; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):51-63. PubMed ID: 16429875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of changes in divine proportion on esthetic perception of smile in frontal view.
    Jahanbin A; Poosti M; Salari S; Esmaily H; Sagha H
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 24(6):1946-9. PubMed ID: 24220379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cephalometric profile evaluations in patients with cleft lip and palate.
    Chaisrisookumporn N; Stella JP; Epker BN
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Aug; 80(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 7552875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative evaluation of facial attractiveness by laypersons in terms of facial proportions and equate it's deviation from divine proportions - A photographic study.
    Shah R; Nair R
    J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2022; 12(5):492-499. PubMed ID: 35755137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Skeletofacial morphology of attractive and nonattractive faces.
    Matoula S; Pancherz H
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Mar; 76(2):204-10. PubMed ID: 16539543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of facial divine proportion in North Indian Population.
    Khan NA; Nagar A; Tandon P; Singh GK; Singh A
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2016; 7(3):366-70. PubMed ID: 27630502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of the golden proportion in natural facial esthetics: A systematic review.
    Londono J; Ghasmi S; Lawand G; Mirzaei F; Akbari F; Dashti M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 May; 131(5):804-810. PubMed ID: 35738927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of dental and background facial attractiveness on facial attractiveness and perceived integrity and social and intellectual qualities.
    Papio MA; Fields HW; Beck FM; Firestone AR; Rosenstiel SF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Oct; 156(4):464-474.e1. PubMed ID: 31582118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Golden proportions as predictors of attractiveness and malocclusion.
    Rajiv A; Juhi Y
    Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(6):788-93. PubMed ID: 25728115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Facial esthetics in adolescents and its relationship to "ideal" ratios and angles.
    Kiekens RM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; van 't Hof MA; van 't Hof BE; Straatman H; Maltha JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):188.e1-8. PubMed ID: 18249280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of the divine proportion in the esthetic improvement of patients undergoing combined orthodontic/orthognathic surgical treatment.
    Baker BW; Woods MG
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(2):108-20. PubMed ID: 11482289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vertical and horizontal proportions of the face and their correlation to phi among Indians in Moradabad population: A survey.
    Anand S; Tripathi S; Chopra A; Khaneja K; Agarwal S
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2015; 15(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 26929498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.
    Maple JR; Vig KW; Beck FM; Larsen PE; Shanker S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):690-6; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16360907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Esthetic preferences of orthodontists, dentists, and plastic surgeons for balanced facial profiles.
    Milutinovic J; Aleksic E; Avramov S; Kalevski K; Gajic M; Pejanovic D; Milic J
    J Oral Sci; 2023 Mar; 65(2):73-76. PubMed ID: 36823034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Objective assessment of the contribution of dental esthetics and facial attractiveness in men via eye tracking.
    Baker RS; Fields HW; Beck FM; Firestone AR; Rosenstiel SF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):523-533. PubMed ID: 29602344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation Between Cephalometric Measures and End-of-Treatment Facial Attractiveness.
    Yu XN; Bai D; Feng X; Liu YH; Chen WJ; Li S; Han GL; Jiang RP; Xu TM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 27(2):405-9. PubMed ID: 26872281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contribution of malocclusion and female facial attractiveness to smile esthetics evaluated by eye tracking.
    Richards MR; Fields HW; Beck FM; Firestone AR; Walther DB; Rosenstiel S; Sacksteder JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4):472-82. PubMed ID: 25836007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.