BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

419 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28451763)

  • 1. Evaluating the performance of PI-RADS v2 in the non-academic setting.
    Jordan EJ; Fiske C; Zagoria RJ; Westphalen AC
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Nov; 42(11):2725-2731. PubMed ID: 28451763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. PI-RADS v2 and ADC values: is there room for improvement?
    Jordan EJ; Fiske C; Zagoria R; Westphalen AC
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Nov; 43(11):3109-3116. PubMed ID: 29550953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Preliminary applicability evaluation of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 diagnostic score in 3.0T multi-parameters magnetic resonance imaging combined with prostate specific antigen density for prostate cancer].
    Zuo MZ; Zhao WL; Wei CG; Zhang CY; Wen R; Gu YF; Li MJ; Zhang YY; Wu JF; Li X; Shen JK
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Dec; 97(47):3693-3698. PubMed ID: 29325321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How to make clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary prostate screening in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADs v2 score ≤ 3?
    Zhang Y; Zeng N; Zhang F; Huang Y; Tian Y
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Jan; 25(1):175-186. PubMed ID: 31473884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Role of PSA Density among PI-RADS v2.1 Categories to Avoid an Unnecessary Transition Zone Biopsy in Patients with PSA 4-20 ng/mL.
    Wang ZB; Wei CG; Zhang YY; Pan P; Dai GC; Tu J; Shen JK
    Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():3995789. PubMed ID: 34671673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies in men with PSA levels of 4-10 ng/ml?
    Xu N; Wu YP; Chen DN; Ke ZB; Cai H; Wei Y; Zheng QS; Huang JB; Li XD; Xue XY
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2018 May; 144(5):987-995. PubMed ID: 29504080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Classification in the Prediction of Tumor Aggressiveness in Targeted Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound-Fusion Biopsy.
    Borkowetz A; Platzek I; Toma M; Renner T; Herout R; Baunacke M; Laniado M; Baretton GB; Froehner M; Zastrow S; Wirth MP
    Urol Int; 2017; 99(2):177-185. PubMed ID: 28531902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using the prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RIDS v2) to detect prostate cancer can prevent unnecessary biopsies and invasive treatment.
    Liu C; Liu SL; Wang ZX; Yu K; Feng CX; Ke Z; Wang L; Zeng XY
    Asian J Androl; 2018; 20(5):459-464. PubMed ID: 29667616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prostate imaging-reporting and data system version 2 in combination with clinical parameters for prostate cancer detection: a single center experience.
    Wang L; Luo Y; Liu T; Deng M; Huang X
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2023 Jul; 55(7):1659-1664. PubMed ID: 37171702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The combination of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RADS v2) and periprostatic fat thickness on multi-parametric MRI to predict the presence of prostate cancer.
    Cao Y; Cao M; Chen Y; Yu W; Fan Y; Liu Q; Gao G; Zhao Z; Wang X; Jin J
    Oncotarget; 2017 Jul; 8(27):44040-44049. PubMed ID: 28476042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combination of prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density predicts biopsy outcome in prostate biopsy naïve patients.
    Washino S; Okochi T; Saito K; Konishi T; Hirai M; Kobayashi Y; Miyagawa T
    BJU Int; 2017 Feb; 119(2):225-233. PubMed ID: 26935594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A cohort of transperineal electromagnetically tracked magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided biopsy: assessing the impact of inter-reader variability on cancer detection.
    Wajswol E; Winoker JS; Anastos H; Falagario U; Okhawere K; Martini A; Treacy PJ; Voutsinas N; Knauer CJ; Sfakianos JP; Lewis SC; Taouli BA; Rastinehad AR
    BJU Int; 2020 Apr; 125(4):531-540. PubMed ID: 31762182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of PI-RADS 2, ADC histogram-derived parameters, and their combination for the diagnosis of peripheral zone prostate cancer.
    Lin WC; Westphalen AC; Silva GE; Chodraui Filho S; Reis RB; Muglia VF
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Nov; 41(11):2209-2217. PubMed ID: 27364781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. PSA density is complementary to prostate MP-MRI PI-RADS scoring system for risk stratification of clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Frisbie JW; Van Besien AJ; Lee A; Xu L; Wang S; Choksi A; Afzal MA; Naslund MJ; Lane B; Wong J; Wnorowski A; Siddiqui MM
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2023 Jun; 26(2):347-352. PubMed ID: 35523940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinically insignificant prostate cancer suitable for active surveillance according to Prostate Cancer Research International: Active surveillance criteria: Utility of PI-RADS v2.
    Yim JH; Kim CK; Kim JH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Apr; 47(4):1072-1079. PubMed ID: 28901655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterizing indeterminate (Likert-score 3/5) peripheral zone prostate lesions with PSA density, PI-RADS scoring and qualitative descriptors on multiparametric MRI.
    Brizmohun Appayya M; Sidhu HS; Dikaios N; Johnston EW; Simmons LA; Freeman A; Kirkham AP; Ahmed HU; Punwani S
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Feb; 91(1083):20170645. PubMed ID: 29189042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. PI-RADS v2 and periprostatic fat measured on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging can predict upgrading in radical prostatectomy pathology amongst patients with biopsy Gleason score 3 + 3 prostate cancer.
    Zhai L; Fan Y; Sun S; Wang H; Meng Y; Hu S; Wang X; Yu W; Jin J
    Scand J Urol; 2018; 52(5-6):333-339. PubMed ID: 30895901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can the addition of clinical information improve the accuracy of PI-RADS version 2 for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in positive MRI?
    Polanec SH; Bickel H; Wengert GJ; Arnoldner M; Clauser P; Susani M; Shariat SF; Pinker K; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT
    Clin Radiol; 2020 Feb; 75(2):157.e1-157.e7. PubMed ID: 31690449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Associated With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 (Equivocal) Lesions Identified on Multiparametric Prostate MRI.
    Sheridan AD; Nath SK; Syed JS; Aneja S; Sprenkle PC; Weinreb JC; Spektor M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Feb; 210(2):347-357. PubMed ID: 29112469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of PI-RADS 4 cases: Management recommendations for negatively biopsied patients.
    Ullrich T; Arsov C; Quentin M; Laqua N; Klingebiel M; Martin O; Hiester A; Blondin D; Rabenalt R; Albers P; Antoch G; Schimmöller L
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Apr; 113():1-6. PubMed ID: 30927932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.