BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28452042)

  • 1. What should I expect from my recalled Adept Hip Resurfacing?
    Cadossi M; Terrando S; Sambri A; Tedesco G; Mazzotti A; Bordini B; De Pasquale D; Faldini C
    Musculoskelet Surg; 2017 Dec; 101(3):249-254. PubMed ID: 28452042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are Females at Greater Risk for Revision Surgery After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty With the Articular Surface Replacement Prosthesis?
    Donahue GS; Lindgren V; Galea VP; Madanat R; Muratoglu O; Malchau H
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2257-65. PubMed ID: 27121872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Effectiveness of Blood Metal Ions in Identifying Patients with Unilateral Birmingham Hip Resurfacing and Corail-Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants at Risk of Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris.
    Matharu GS; Berryman F; Brash L; Pynsent PB; Treacy RB; Dunlop DJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Apr; 98(8):617-26. PubMed ID: 27098320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two-year serum metal ion levels in minimally invasive total conservative hip resurfacing: preliminary results of a prospective study.
    Tai SM; Millard N; Munir S; Jenabzadeh AR; Walter LR; Walter WL
    ANZ J Surg; 2015 Mar; 85(3):164-8. PubMed ID: 25288230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Revision of Metal-on-metal Hip Prostheses Results in Marked Reduction of Blood Cobalt and Chromium Ion Concentrations.
    Lainiala O; Reito A; Elo P; Pajamäki J; Puolakka T; Eskelinen A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jul; 473(7):2305-13. PubMed ID: 25623595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The withdrawn ASR™ THA and hip resurfacing systems: how have our patients fared over 1 to 6 years?
    Hug KT; Watters TS; Vail TP; Bolognesi MP
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Feb; 471(2):430-8. PubMed ID: 22926492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Understanding why metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties fail: a comparison between patients with well-functioning and revised birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasties. AAOS exhibit selection.
    Hart AJ; Matthies A; Henckel J; Ilo K; Skinner J; Noble PC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Feb; 94(4):e22. PubMed ID: 22336981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acetabular cup malalignment after total hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a case for elective revision?
    Mai MC; Milbrandt JC; Hulsen J; Allan DG
    Orthopedics; 2009 Nov; 32(11):853. PubMed ID: 19902880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compared with 28-mm diameter metal-on-metal total hip replacement: a randomised study with six to nine years' follow-up.
    Vendittoli PA; Rivière C; Roy AG; Barry J; Lusignan D; Lavigne M
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Nov; 95-B(11):1464-73. PubMed ID: 24151264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The articular surface replacement implant recall: a United Kingdom district hospital experience.
    Whitwell GS; Shine A; Young SK
    Hip Int; 2012; 22(4):362-70. PubMed ID: 22865254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic Screening of Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris after Recap-M2A-Magnum Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Mäntymäki H; Junnila M; Lankinen P; Seppänen M; Vahlberg T; Mäkelä KT
    Scand J Surg; 2017 Dec; 106(4):342-349. PubMed ID: 28737077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predicting high blood metal ion concentrations following hip resurfacing.
    Matharu GS; Berryman F; Brash L; Pynsent PB; Treacy RB; Dunlop DJ
    Hip Int; 2015; 25(6):510-9. PubMed ID: 26109153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical Performance of the ASR and ReCap Resurfacing Implants—7 Years Follow-Up.
    Borgwardt A; Borgwardt L; Borgwardt L; Zerahn B; Fabricius SD; Ribel-Madsen S
    J Arthroplasty; 2015 Jun; 30(6):993-7. PubMed ID: 25720854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Metal ion levels from well-functioning Birmingham Hip Resurfacings decline significantly at ten years.
    Van Der Straeten C; Van Quickenborne D; De Roest B; Calistri A; Victor J; De Smet K
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Oct; 95-B(10):1332-8. PubMed ID: 24078528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A 5-year survival analysis of 160 Biomet Magnum M2 metal-on-metal total hip prostheses.
    Koper MC; Mathijssen NM; Vehmeijer SB
    Hip Int; 2016; 26(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 26541184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Metal ion levels decrease after revision for metallosis arising from large-diameter metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty.
    Ebreo D; Khan A; El-Meligy M; Armstrong C; Peter V
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2011 Dec; 77(6):777-81. PubMed ID: 22308623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correlation between inclination of the acetabular component and metal ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing replacement.
    De Haan R; Pattyn C; Gill HS; Murray DW; Campbell PA; De Smet K
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Oct; 90(10):1291-7. PubMed ID: 18827237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metallosis and cobalt - chrome intoxication after hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Czekaj J; Ehlinger M; Rahme M; Bonnomet F
    J Orthop Sci; 2016 May; 21(3):389-94. PubMed ID: 26740441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. One-year prospective comparative study of three large-diameter metal-on-metal total hip prostheses: serum metal ion levels and clinical outcomes.
    Lardanchet JF; Taviaux J; Arnalsteen D; Gabrion A; Mertl P
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2012 May; 98(3):265-74. PubMed ID: 22480865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A safe zone for acetabular component position in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: winner of the 2012 HAP PAUL award.
    Liu F; Gross TP
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Aug; 28(7):1224-30. PubMed ID: 23540536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.