These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28453615)

  • 21. An Analysis of Uncertainties and Data Collection Agreements in the Cancer Drugs Fund.
    Trigg LA; Barnish MS; Hayward S; Shaw N; Crathorne L; Groves B; Spoors J; Strong T; Melendez-Torres GJ; Farmer C
    Pharmacoecon Open; 2024 Mar; 8(2):303-311. PubMed ID: 38087151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cabazitaxel for Hormone-Relapsed Metastatic Prostate Cancer Previously Treated With a Docetaxel-Containing Regimen: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.
    Kearns B; Pandor A; Stevenson M; Hamilton J; Chambers D; Clowes M; Graham J; Kumar MS
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Apr; 35(4):415-424. PubMed ID: 27770303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Informing a decision framework for when NICE should recommend the use of health technologies only in the context of an appropriately designed programme of evidence development.
    Claxton K; Palmer S; Longworth L; Bojke L; Griffin S; McKenna C; Soares M; Spackman E; Youn J
    Health Technol Assess; 2012; 16(46):1-323. PubMed ID: 23177626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prices and clinical benefit of cancer drugs in the USA and Europe: a cost-benefit analysis.
    Vokinger KN; Hwang TJ; Grischott T; Reichert S; Tibau A; Rosemann T; Kesselheim AS
    Lancet Oncol; 2020 May; 21(5):664-670. PubMed ID: 32359489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.
    Forbes C; Shirran L; Bagnall AM; Duffy S; ter Riet G
    Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(28):1-110. PubMed ID: 11701100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Axitinib, cabozantinib, everolimus, nivolumab, sunitinib and best supportive care in previously treated renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Edwards SJ; Wakefield V; Cain P; Karner C; Kew K; Bacelar M; Masento N; Salih F
    Health Technol Assess; 2018 Jan; 22(6):1-278. PubMed ID: 29393024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (mono- or combination chemotherapy), bevacizumab (combination with non-oxaliplatin chemotherapy) and panitumumab (monotherapy) for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line chemotherapy (review of technology appraisal No.150 and part review of technology appraisal No. 118): a systematic review and economic model.
    Hoyle M; Crathorne L; Peters J; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Tappenden P; Hyde C
    Health Technol Assess; 2013 Apr; 17(14):1-237. PubMed ID: 23547747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Anticancer drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration for gastrointestinal malignancies: Clinical benefit and price considerations.
    Jiang DM; Chan KKW; Jang RW; Booth C; Liu G; Amir E; Mason R; Everest L; Elimova E
    Cancer Med; 2019 Apr; 8(4):1584-1593. PubMed ID: 30848108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical benefit, price and approval characteristics of FDA-approved new drugs for treating advanced solid cancer, 2000-2015.
    Vivot A; Jacot J; Zeitoun JD; Ravaud P; Crequit P; Porcher R
    Ann Oncol; 2017 May; 28(5):1111-1116. PubMed ID: 28453694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cetuximab for recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a NICE single technology appraisal.
    Bagust A; Greenhalgh J; Boland A; Fleeman N; McLeod C; Dickson R; Dundar Y; Proudlove C; Shaw R
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2010; 28(6):439-48. PubMed ID: 20465313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. UK newspaper reporting of the NHS cancer drugs fund, 2010 to 2015: a retrospective media analysis.
    Lewison G; Aggarwal A; Roe P; Møller H; Chamberlain C; Sullivan R
    J R Soc Med; 2018 Oct; 111(10):366-373. PubMed ID: 30212638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Delivery of meaningful cancer care: a retrospective cohort study assessing cost and benefit with the ASCO and ESMO frameworks.
    Del Paggio JC; Sullivan R; Schrag D; Hopman WM; Azariah B; Pramesh CS; Tannock IF; Booth CM
    Lancet Oncol; 2017 Jul; 18(7):887-894. PubMed ID: 28583794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Design of patient access schemes in the UK: influence of health technology assessment by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.
    Jarosławski S; Toumi M
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2011 Jul; 9(4):209-15. PubMed ID: 21682349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A systematic review and economic evaluation of the use of tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors, adalimumab and infliximab, for Crohn's disease.
    Dretzke J; Edlin R; Round J; Connock M; Hulme C; Czeczot J; Fry-Smith A; McCabe C; Meads C
    Health Technol Assess; 2011 Feb; 15(6):1-244. PubMed ID: 21291629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparative analysis of two contrasting European approaches for rewarding the value added by drugs for cancer: England versus France.
    Drummond M; de Pouvourville G; Jones E; Haig J; Saba G; Cawston H
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2014 May; 32(5):509-20. PubMed ID: 24599784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Crizotinib for Untreated Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.
    Morgan P; Woolacott N; Biswas M; Mebrahtu T; Harden M; Hodgson R
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Sep; 35(9):909-919. PubMed ID: 28342113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparative Assessment of Reimbursement Recommendations by NICE and HAS for Oncology New Medicines Indicated for the Treatment of Solid Tumors from 2015 to 2021.
    Trouiller JB; Laramée P
    Med Decis Making; 2023; 43(7-8):961-972. PubMed ID: 37480275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Tisagenlecleucel for the Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia in People Aged up to 25 Years: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.
    Walton M; Sharif S; Simmonds M; Claxton L; Hodgson R
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2019 Oct; 37(10):1209-1217. PubMed ID: 30982165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A systematic review of economic evaluations in second and later lines of therapy for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.
    Jäkel A; Plested M; Dharamshi K; Modha R; Bridge S; Johns A
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Feb; 11(1):27-43. PubMed ID: 23329379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.