These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

374 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28454719)

  • 1. Prioritizing Information during Working Memory: Beyond Sustained Internal Attention.
    Myers NE; Stokes MG; Nobre AC
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2017 Jun; 21(6):449-461. PubMed ID: 28454719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analogous mechanisms of selection and updating in declarative and procedural working memory: experiments and a computational model.
    Oberauer K; Souza AS; Druey MD; Gade M
    Cogn Psychol; 2013 Mar; 66(2):157-211. PubMed ID: 23276689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recovery of information from latent memory stores decreases over time.
    Nouri A; Ester EF
    Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Jan; 11(1-2):101-110. PubMed ID: 31130062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Within-Category Decoding of Information in Different Attentional States in Short-Term Memory.
    LaRocque JJ; Riggall AC; Emrich SM; Postle BR
    Cereb Cortex; 2017 Oct; 27(10):4881-4890. PubMed ID: 27702811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dissecting the Neural Focus of Attention Reveals Distinct Processes for Spatial Attention and Object-Based Storage in Visual Working Memory.
    Hakim N; Adam KCS; Gunseli E; Awh E; Vogel EK
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Apr; 30(4):526-540. PubMed ID: 30817220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Working memory prioritization impacts neural recovery from distraction.
    Mallett R; Lewis-Peacock JA
    Cortex; 2019 Dec; 121():225-238. PubMed ID: 31629945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The short- and long-term fates of memory items retained outside the focus of attention.
    LaRocque JJ; Eichenbaum AS; Starrett MJ; Rose NS; Emrich SM; Postle BR
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Apr; 43(3):453-68. PubMed ID: 25472902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrophysiological evidence supports the role of sustained visuospatial attention in maintaining visual WM contents.
    Liang T; Chen X; Ye C; Zhang J; Liu Q
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Dec; 146():54-62. PubMed ID: 31639381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Working memory and fluid intelligence: capacity, attention control, and secondary memory retrieval.
    Unsworth N; Fukuda K; Awh E; Vogel EK
    Cogn Psychol; 2014 Jun; 71():1-26. PubMed ID: 24531497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Nature of Task Set Representations in Working Memory.
    Kikumoto A; Mayr U
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2017 Nov; 29(11):1950-1961. PubMed ID: 28777061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. EEG dynamics reveal a dissociation between storage and selective attention within working memory.
    Günseli E; Fahrenfort JJ; van Moorselaar D; Daoultzis KC; Meeter M; Olivers CNL
    Sci Rep; 2019 Sep; 9(1):13499. PubMed ID: 31534150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of conjunctive representations in prioritizing and selecting planned actions.
    Kikumoto A; Mayr U; Badre D
    Elife; 2022 Oct; 11():. PubMed ID: 36314769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Working memory as internal attention: toward an integrative account of internal and external selection processes.
    Kiyonaga A; Egner T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Apr; 20(2):228-42. PubMed ID: 23233157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automatic Prioritization of Self-Referential Stimuli in Working Memory.
    Yin S; Sui J; Chiu YC; Chen A; Egner T
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Mar; 30(3):415-423. PubMed ID: 30653399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Benefits of flexible prioritization in working memory can arise without costs.
    Myers NE; Chekroud SR; Stokes MG; Nobre AC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Mar; 44(3):398-411. PubMed ID: 28816476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Oscillatory correlates of prioritization of emotional stimuli in WM: The interaction between bottom-up and top-down processes.
    Macedo-Pascual J; Hinojosa JA; Poch C
    Biol Psychol; 2019 Jul; 145():167-173. PubMed ID: 31102670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Examining the influence of working memory on updating mental models.
    Valadao DF; Anderson B; Danckert J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(7):1442-56. PubMed ID: 25406912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feature-based and spatial attentional selection in visual working memory.
    Heuer A; Schubö A
    Mem Cognit; 2016 May; 44(4):621-32. PubMed ID: 26754949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Working memory and retrieval: a resource-dependent inhibition model.
    Conway AR; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1994 Dec; 123(4):354-73. PubMed ID: 7996121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Independent Attention Mechanisms Control the Activation of Tactile and Visual Working Memory Representations.
    Katus T; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 May; 30(5):644-655. PubMed ID: 29346019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.