755 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28454860)
1. Assessing drivers' response during automated driver support system failures with non-driving tasks.
Shen S; Neyens DM
J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():149-155. PubMed ID: 28454860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effective cues for accelerating young drivers' time to transfer control following a period of conditional automation.
Wright TJ; Agrawal R; Samuel S; Wang Y; Zilberstein S; Fisher DL
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():14-20. PubMed ID: 29031513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of varying levels of vehicle automation on drivers' lane changing behaviour.
Madigan R; Louw T; Merat N
PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192190. PubMed ID: 29466402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Age-related differences in effects of non-driving related tasks on takeover performance in automated driving.
Wu Y; Kihara K; Hasegawa K; Takeda Y; Sato T; Akamatsu M; Kitazaki S
J Safety Res; 2020 Feb; 72():231-238. PubMed ID: 32199568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Drivers anticipate lead-vehicle conflicts during automated longitudinal control: Sensory cues capture driver attention and promote appropriate and timely responses.
Morando A; Victor T; Dozza M
Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():206-219. PubMed ID: 27658227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is take-over time all that matters? The impact of visual-cognitive load on driver take-over quality after conditionally automated driving.
Zeeb K; Buchner A; Schrauf M
Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Jul; 92():230-9. PubMed ID: 27107472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anticipatory Driving in Automated Vehicles: The Effects of Driving Experience and Distraction.
He D; DeGuzman CA; Donmez B
Hum Factors; 2023 Jun; 65(4):663. PubMed ID: 34348496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of motor control requirements on drivers' eye-gaze pattern during automated driving.
Goncalves RC; Louw TL; Quaresma M; Madigan R; Merat N
Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105788. PubMed ID: 33039820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Driver response and recovery following automation initiated disengagement in real-world hands-free driving.
Gershon P; Mehler B; Reimer B
Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(4):356-361. PubMed ID: 36988583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Understanding take-over performance of high crash risk drivers during conditionally automated driving.
Lin Q; Li S; Ma X; Lu G
Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Aug; 143():105543. PubMed ID: 32485431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Moving Into the Loop: An Investigation of Drivers' Steering Behavior in Highly Automated Vehicles.
Alsaid A; Lee JD; Price M
Hum Factors; 2020 Jun; 62(4):671-683. PubMed ID: 31180728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of scheduled manual driving on drowsiness and response to take over request: A simulator study towards understanding drivers in automated driving.
Wu Y; Kihara K; Takeda Y; Sato T; Akamatsu M; Kitazaki S
Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Mar; 124():202-209. PubMed ID: 30665055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Highly automated driving, secondary task performance, and driver state.
Merat N; Jamson AH; Lai FC; Carsten O
Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):762-71. PubMed ID: 23156621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of non-driving related tasks on the development of driver sleepiness and takeover performances in prolonged automated driving.
Pan H; He H; Wang Y; Cheng Y; Dai Z
J Safety Res; 2023 Sep; 86():148-163. PubMed ID: 37718042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Driving context influences drivers' decision to engage in visual-manual phone tasks: Evidence from a naturalistic driving study.
Tivesten E; Dozza M
J Safety Res; 2015 Jun; 53():87-96. PubMed ID: 25934001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving.
Zeeb K; Buchner A; Schrauf M
Accid Anal Prev; 2015 May; 78():212-221. PubMed ID: 25794922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Keeping the driver in the loop through semi-automated or manual lane changes in conditionally automated driving.
Dillmann J; den Hartigh RJR; Kurpiers CM; Pelzer J; Raisch FK; Cox RFA; de Waard D
Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Nov; 162():106397. PubMed ID: 34563644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Were they in the loop during automated driving? Links between visual attention and crash potential.
Louw T; Madigan R; Carsten O; Merat N
Inj Prev; 2017 Aug; 23(4):281-286. PubMed ID: 27655754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How Do Drivers Respond to Silent Automation Failures? Driving Simulator Study and Comparison of Computational Driver Braking Models.
Bianchi Piccinini G; Lehtonen E; Forcolin F; Engström J; Albers D; Markkula G; Lodin J; Sandin J
Hum Factors; 2020 Nov; 62(7):1212-1229. PubMed ID: 31590570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use patterns among early adopters of adaptive cruise control.
Xiong H; Boyle LN; Moeckli J; Dow BR; Brown TL
Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):722-33. PubMed ID: 23156618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
