336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28454868)
1. Brake reactions of distracted drivers to pedestrian Forward Collision Warning systems.
Lubbe N
J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():23-32. PubMed ID: 28454868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adaptive forward collision warnings: The impact of imperfect technology on behavioral adaptation, warning effectiveness and acceptance.
Reinmueller K; Steinhauser M
Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jul; 128():217-229. PubMed ID: 31063907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Expected Crash and Injury Reduction from Production Forward Collision and Lane Departure Warning Systems.
Kusano KD; Gabler HC
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S109-14. PubMed ID: 26436219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Eye movement and brake reactions to real world brake-capacity forward collision warnings--a naturalistic driving study.
Wege C; Will S; Victor T
Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Sep; 58():259-70. PubMed ID: 23068426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Age and gender differences in time to collision at braking from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
Montgomery J; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S15-20. PubMed ID: 25307380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Practice makes better - Learning effects of driving with a multi-stage collision warning.
Winkler S; Kazazi J; Vollrath M
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():398-409. PubMed ID: 29477461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Driver Behavior During Overtaking Maneuvers from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
Chen R; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S176-81. PubMed ID: 26436229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Population distributions of time to collision at brake application during car following from naturalistic driving data.
Kusano KD; Chen R; Montgomery J; Gabler HC
J Safety Res; 2015 Sep; 54():95-104. PubMed ID: 26403908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Driving with a partially autonomous forward collision warning system: how do drivers react?
Muhrer E; Reinprecht K; Vollrath M
Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):698-708. PubMed ID: 23156616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gaze position modulates the effectiveness of forward collision warnings for drowsy drivers.
Gaspar JG; Schwarz CW; Brown TL; Kang J
Accid Anal Prev; 2019 May; 126():25-30. PubMed ID: 29277383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Collision warning timing, driver distraction, and driver response to imminent rear-end collisions in a high-fidelity driving simulator.
Lee JD; McGehee DV; Brown TL; Reyes ML
Hum Factors; 2002; 44(2):314-34. PubMed ID: 12452276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Simulator training with a forward collision warning system: effects on driver-system interactions and driver trust.
Koustanaï A; Cavallo V; Delhomme P; Mas A
Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):709-21. PubMed ID: 23156617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How do drivers negotiate intersections with pedestrians? The importance of pedestrian time-to-arrival and visibility.
Dozza M; Boda CN; Jaber L; Thalya P; Lubbe N
Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Jun; 141():105524. PubMed ID: 32402866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of tactile, visual, and auditory warnings for rear-end collision prevention in simulated driving.
Scott JJ; Gray R
Hum Factors; 2008 Apr; 50(2):264-75. PubMed ID: 18516837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How do drivers avoid collisions? A driving simulator-based study.
Li X; Rakotonirainy A; Yan X
J Safety Res; 2019 Sep; 70():89-96. PubMed ID: 31848013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Forward collision warning based on a driver model to increase drivers' acceptance.
Puente Guillen P; Gohl I
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S21-S26. PubMed ID: 31381428
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Distracting behaviors among teenagers and young, middle-aged, and older adult drivers when driving without and with warnings from an integrated vehicle safety system.
Kidd DG; Buonarosa ML
J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():177-185. PubMed ID: 28454863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adverse Behavioral Adaptation to Adaptive Forward Collision Warning Systems: An Investigation of Primary and Secondary Task Performance.
Reinmueller K; Kiesel A; Steinhauser M
Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Oct; 146():105718. PubMed ID: 32847736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of precrash velocity reduction on occupant response using a human body finite element model.
Guleyupoglu B; Schap J; Kusano KD; Gayzik FS
Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Jul; 18(5):508-514. PubMed ID: 28102701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pedestrian crossing situations: quantification of comfort boundaries to guide intervention timing.
Lubbe N; Rosén E
Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Oct; 71():261-6. PubMed ID: 24956130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
