These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28454893)

  • 1. Transfer of learned category-response associations is modulated by instruction.
    Longman CS; Milton F; Wills AJ; Verbruggen F
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Mar; 184():144-167. PubMed ID: 28454893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Learning in the absence of overt practice: a novel (previously unseen) stimulus can trigger retrieval of an unpracticed response.
    Longman CS; Kiesel A; Verbruggen F
    Psychol Res; 2020 Jun; 84(4):1065-1083. PubMed ID: 30415378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multiple priming instances increase the impact of practice-based but not verbal code-based stimulus-response associations.
    Pfeuffer CU; Moutsopoulou K; Waszak F; Kiesel A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Mar; 184():100-109. PubMed ID: 28511771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stimulus-response bindings in priming.
    Henson RN; Eckstein D; Waszak F; Frings C; Horner AJ
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2014 Jul; 18(7):376-84. PubMed ID: 24768034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does test-enhanced learning transfer for triple associates?
    Pan SC; Wong CM; Potter ZE; Mejia J; Rickard TC
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jan; 44(1):24-36. PubMed ID: 26324093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implicit sequence learning based on instructed task set.
    Gaschler R; Frensch PA; Cohen A; Wenke D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1389-407. PubMed ID: 22545612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Control by association: Transfer of implicitly primed attentional states across linked stimuli.
    Bejjani C; Zhang Z; Egner T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Apr; 25(2):617-626. PubMed ID: 29450789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Unintentional and intentional learning of noncorresponding stimulus-response associations in the Simon task.
    Vu KP
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Feb; 136(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 20605125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Learning through instructions vs. learning through practice: flanker congruency effects from instructed and applied S-R mappings.
    Wenke D; De Houwer J; De Winne J; Liefooghe B
    Psychol Res; 2015 Nov; 79(6):899-912. PubMed ID: 26511962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison promotes learning and transfer of relational categories.
    Kurtz KJ; Boukrina O; Gentner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1303-10. PubMed ID: 23421515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retrieval of bindings between task-irrelevant stimuli and responses can facilitate behaviour under conditions of high response certainty.
    Horner AJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(3):561-73. PubMed ID: 26085119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the efficiency of instruction-based rule encoding.
    Ruge H; Karcz T; Mark T; Martin V; Zwosta K; Wolfensteller U
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Mar; 184():4-19. PubMed ID: 28427713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Category label and response location shifts in category learning.
    Maddox WT; Glass BD; O'Brien JB; Filoteo JV; Ashby FG
    Psychol Res; 2010 Mar; 74(2):219-36. PubMed ID: 19471959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What is automatized during perceptual categorization?
    Roeder JL; Ashby FG
    Cognition; 2016 Sep; 154():22-33. PubMed ID: 27232521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Learning and transfer of category knowledge in an indirect categorization task.
    Helie S; Ashby FG
    Psychol Res; 2012 May; 76(3):292-303. PubMed ID: 21660482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of stimulus features and instruction on response coding, selection, and inhibition: evidence from repetition effects under task switching.
    Druey MD; Hübner R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Oct; 61(10):1573-600. PubMed ID: 18777444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stimulus-classification and stimulus-action associations: Effects of repetition learning and durability.
    Moutsopoulou K; Yang Q; Desantis A; Waszak F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(9):1744-57. PubMed ID: 25396708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dorsal striatum mediates deliberate decision making, not late-stage, stimulus-response learning.
    Hiebert NM; Owen AM; Seergobin KN; MacDonald PA
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Dec; 38(12):6133-6156. PubMed ID: 28945307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the minimization of task switch costs following long-term training.
    Berryhill ME; Hughes HC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):503-14. PubMed ID: 19304641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Array training in a categorization task.
    Homa D; Powell D; Ferguson R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(1):45-59. PubMed ID: 23713978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.