296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28455082)
1. Ovarian reserve following cesarean section with salpingectomy vs tubal ligation: a randomized trial.
Ganer Herman H; Gluck O; Keidar R; Kerner R; Kovo M; Levran D; Bar J; Sagiv R
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):472.e1-472.e6. PubMed ID: 28455082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy vs tubal ligation at the time of cesarean delivery.
Venkatesh KK; Clark LH; Stamilio DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 220(1):106.e1-106.e10. PubMed ID: 30170036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Wide excision of soft tissues adjacent to the ovary and fallopian tube does not impair the ovarian reserve in women undergoing prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy: results from a randomized, controlled trial.
Venturella R; Morelli M; Lico D; Di Cello A; Rocca M; Sacchinelli A; Mocciaro R; D'Alessandro P; Maiorana A; Gizzo S; Zullo F
Fertil Steril; 2015 Nov; 104(5):1332-9. PubMed ID: 26335129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Postpartum Permanent Sterilization: Could Bilateral Salpingectomy Replace Bilateral Tubal Ligation?
Danis RB; Della Badia CR; Richard SD
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):928-32. PubMed ID: 27234430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Complete salpingectomy versus tubal ligation during cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yang M; Du Y; Hu Y
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Nov; 34(22):3794-3802. PubMed ID: 31752570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Salpingectomy Compared With Tubal Ligation at Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Garcia C; Moskowitz OM; Chisholm CA; Duska LR; Warren AL; Lyons GR; Pettit KE
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 132(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 29889755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tubal sterilization during cesarean section or as an elective procedure? Effect on the ovarian reserve.
Ozyer S; Moraloğlu O; Gülerman C; Engin-Üstün Y; Uzunlar O; Karayalçin R; Uğur M
Contraception; 2012 Nov; 86(5):488-93. PubMed ID: 22520643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Paradigm shift from tubal ligation to opportunistic salpingectomy at cesarean delivery in the United States.
Mandelbaum RS; Matsuzaki S; Sangara RN; Klar M; Matsushima K; Roman LD; Paulson RJ; Wright JD; Matsuo K
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 225(4):399.e1-399.e32. PubMed ID: 34181896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Longitudinal assessment of anti-Müllerian hormone after cesarean section and influence of bilateral salpingectomy on ovarian reserve.
Ida T; Fujiwara H; Taniguchi Y; Kohyama A
Contraception; 2021 Jun; 103(6):394-399. PubMed ID: 33539802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feasibility of Complete Salpingectomy Compared With Standard Postpartum Tubal Ligation at Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Subramaniam A; Blanchard CT; Erickson BK; Szychowski J; Leath CA; Biggio JR; Huh WK
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 132(1):20-27. PubMed ID: 29889762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Complications after opportunistic salpingectomy compared with tubal ligation at cesarean section: a retrospective cohort study.
Rufin KGA; do Valle HA; McAlpine JN; Elwood C; Hanley GE
Fertil Steril; 2024 Mar; 121(3):531-539. PubMed ID: 38043843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of opportunistic salpingectomy on ovarian cancer mortality and healthcare costs: a call for universal insurance coverage.
Naumann RW; Hughes BN; Brown J; Drury LK; Herzog TJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 225(4):397.e1-397.e6. PubMed ID: 33798477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A retrospective analysis of the effect of salpingectomy on serum antiMüllerian hormone level and ovarian reserve.
Ye XP; Yang YZ; Sun XX
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 212(1):53.e1-10. PubMed ID: 25046807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of various tubal surgeries to serum antimullerian hormone level and outcome of the subsequent IVF-ET treatment.
Ni L; Sadiq S; Mao Y; Cui Y; Wang W; Liu J
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2013 Apr; 29(4):345-9. PubMed ID: 23339657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Racial Disparities in Sterilization Procedure Performed at Time of Cesarean Section.
Walheim LK; Hong CX; Hamm RF
Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; 41(S 01):e934-e938. PubMed ID: 36351447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the efficacy between bilateral proximal tubal occlusion and total salpingectomy on ovarian reserve and the cholinergic system: an experimental study.
Atilgan R; Pala Ş; Kuloğlu T; Şanli C; Yavuzkir Ş; Özkan ZS
Turk J Med Sci; 2020 Jun; 50(4):1097-1105. PubMed ID: 32394684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sterilization at the time of cesarean section: tubal ligation or hysterectomy?
Bukovsky I; Schneider D; Weinraub Z; Arieli S; Schreyer P; Caspi E
Contraception; 1983 Oct; 28(4):349-56. PubMed ID: 6667624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risks and Benefits of Salpingectomy at the Time of Sterilization.
Castellano T; Zerden M; Marsh L; Boggess K
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2017 Nov; 72(11):663-668. PubMed ID: 29164264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Opportunistic salpingectomy during postpartum contraception procedures at elective and unscheduled cesarean delivery.
Ferrari F; Forte S; Prefumo F; Sartori E; Odicino F
Contraception; 2019 Jun; 99(6):373-376. PubMed ID: 30898658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Utility of Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery for Permanent Sterilization after Failed Attempt at Bilateral Tubal Ligation at the Time of Previous Cesarean Section.
Hui M; Schwartzenburg C; Bhalwal A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Oct; 29(10):1138-1139. PubMed ID: 35863610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
