These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28455178)

  • 1. The Patient Experience: An Analysis of Orthopedic Surgeon Quality on Physician-Rating Sites.
    Ramkumar PN; Navarro SM; Chughtai M; La T; Fisch E; Mont MA
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Sep; 32(9):2905-2910. PubMed ID: 28455178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient-Recorded Physician Ratings: What Can We Learn From 11,527 Online Reviews of Orthopedic Surgeons?
    Yu J; Samuel LT; Yalçin S; Sultan AA; Kamath AF
    J Arthroplasty; 2020 Jun; 35(6S):S364-S367. PubMed ID: 31818501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How social media, training, and demographics influence online reviews across three leading review websites for spine surgeons.
    Donnally CJ; Li DJ; Maguire JA; Roth ES; Barker GP; McCormick JR; Rush AJ; Lebwohl NH
    Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):2081-2090. PubMed ID: 29709552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Online reviews of orthopedic surgeons: an emerging trend.
    Frost C; Mesfin A
    Orthopedics; 2015 Apr; 38(4):e257-62. PubMed ID: 25901617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Provider-Initiated Patient Satisfaction Reporting Yields Improved Physician Ratings Relative to Online Rating Websites.
    Ricciardi BF; Waddell BS; Nodzo SR; Lange J; Nocon AA; Amundsen S; Tarity TD; McLawhorn AS
    Orthopedics; 2017 Sep; 40(5):304-310. PubMed ID: 28817163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Online Ratings of Spine Surgeons: Analysis of 208 Surgeons.
    Zhang J; Omar A; Mesfin A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Jun; 43(12):E722-E726. PubMed ID: 29846366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital Footprint of Academic Vascular Surgeons in the Southern United States on Physician Rating Websites: Cross-sectional Evaluation Study.
    Yan Q; Jensen KJ; Thomas R; Field AR; Jiang Z; Goei C; Davies MG
    JMIR Cardio; 2021 Feb; 5(1):e22975. PubMed ID: 33625359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does experience matter? A meta-analysis of physician rating websites of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
    Jack RA; Burn MB; McCulloch PC; Liberman SR; Varner KE; Harris JD
    Musculoskelet Surg; 2018 Apr; 102(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 28853024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Online Patient Ratings of Hand Surgeons.
    Trehan SK; DeFrancesco CJ; Nguyen JT; Charalel RA; Daluiski A
    J Hand Surg Am; 2016 Jan; 41(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 26710742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictive factors of positive online patient ratings of spine surgeons.
    Kalagara S; Eltorai AEM; DePasse JM; Daniels AH
    Spine J; 2019 Jan; 19(1):182-185. PubMed ID: 30077043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Online ratings of orthopedic surgeons: analysis of 2185 reviews.
    Bakhsh W; Mesfin A
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2014 Aug; 43(8):359-63. PubMed ID: 25136868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors Affecting Orthopedic Sports Medicine Surgeons' Online Reputation.
    Heimdal TR; Gardner SS; Dhanani UM; Harris JD; Liberman SR; McCulloch PC
    Orthopedics; 2021; 44(2):e281-e286. PubMed ID: 33316825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Online ratings of spinal deformity surgeons: analysis of 634 surgeons.
    Melone G; Brodell J; Hernandez C; Menga E; Balkissoon R; Liu X; Zhang J; Mesfin A
    Spine Deform; 2020 Feb; 8(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 31925764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Large Number of Reviews on Physician Rating Websites May Reflect Reputation Management.
    Ramachandran S; Ring D; Langerhuizen D; Vagner G
    Iowa Orthop J; 2022 Jun; 42(1):283-286. PubMed ID: 35821942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Negative Online Ratings of Joint Replacement Surgeons: An Analysis of 6,402 Reviews.
    Imbergamo C; Brzezinski A; Patankar A; Weintraub M; Mazzaferro N; Kayiaros S
    Arthroplast Today; 2021 Jun; 9():106-111. PubMed ID: 34189214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patients and surgeons provide endorsement of core domains for total joint replacement clinical trials.
    Hoang A; Goodman SM; Navarro-Millán IY; Mandl LA; Figgie MP; Bostrom MP; Padgett DE; Sculco PK; McLawhorn AS; Singh JA
    Arthritis Res Ther; 2017 Dec; 19(1):267. PubMed ID: 29208013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of Internet Review Site Comments for Spine Surgeons: How Office Staff, Physician Likeability, and Patient Outcome Are Associated With Online Evaluations.
    Donnally CJ; Roth ES; Li DJ; Maguire JA; McCormick JR; Barker GP; Rivera S; Lebwohl NH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Dec; 43(24):1725-1730. PubMed ID: 29975328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An assessment of data and methodology of online surgeon scorecards.
    Xu LW; Li A; Swinney C; Babu M; Veeravagu A; Wolfe SQ; Nahed BV; Ratliff JK;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):235-242. PubMed ID: 27661563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Associations of Spine Surgeon Training, Office Wait Times, and Social Media Presence with Reviews on Physician Rating Websites.
    Sama AJ; Schiller NC; McCormick JR; Bondar KJ; Li DJ; Canseco JA; Donnally CJ
    J Surg Orthop Adv; 2022; 31(4):256-262. PubMed ID: 36594985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correlates of Google Search Rankings for Spine Surgeons: An Analysis of Academic Pedigree, Social Media Presence, and Patient Ratings.
    Chiu RG; Parola R; Nallani A; Glastris G; Siddiqui N; Bheri A; Shah M; Behbahani M; Mehta AI
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Oct; 45(19):1376-1381. PubMed ID: 32453226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.