These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28455178)

  • 21. [German language physician rating sites].
    Strech D; Reimann S
    Gesundheitswesen; 2012 Aug; 74(8-9):e61-7. PubMed ID: 22189671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An Analysis of Online Ratings of Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgeons.
    Jay JH; Runge NE; Vergara FH; Sabatini CS; Oni JK
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2021 Oct; 41(9):576-579. PubMed ID: 34387231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Association Between Physician Online Rating and Quality of Care.
    Okike K; Peter-Bibb TK; Xie KC; Okike ON
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Dec; 18(12):e324. PubMed ID: 27965191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. How do physician demographics, training, social media usage, online presence, and wait times influence online physician review scores for spine surgeons?
    Donnally CJ; McCormick JR; Li DJ; Maguire JA; Barker GP; Rush AJ; Wang MY
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Feb; 30(2):279-288. PubMed ID: 30497169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Physician-Rating Web Sites: Ethical Implications.
    Samora JB; Lifchez SD; Blazar PE;
    J Hand Surg Am; 2016 Jan; 41(1):104-10.e1. PubMed ID: 26304734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Digital Footprint of Neurological Surgeons.
    Kim C; Gupta R; Shah A; Madill E; Prabhu AV; Agarwal N
    World Neurosurg; 2018 May; 113():e172-e178. PubMed ID: 29427816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Rating a Sports Medicine Surgeon's "Quality" in the Modern Era: an Analysis of Popular Physician Online Rating Websites.
    Nwachukwu BU; Adjei J; Trehan SK; Chang B; Amoo-Achampong K; Nguyen JT; Taylor SA; McCormick F; Ranawat AS
    HSS J; 2016 Oct; 12(3):272-277. PubMed ID: 27703422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An Analysis of Online Ratings of Hip and Knee Surgeons.
    Runge NE; Jay JH; Vergara FH; Oni JK
    J Arthroplasty; 2020 May; 35(5):1432-1436. PubMed ID: 31973969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Analysis of Online Reviews of Orthopaedic Surgeons and Orthopaedic Practices Using Natural Language Processing.
    Langerhuizen DWG; Brown LE; Doornberg JN; Ring D; Kerkhoffs GMMJ; Janssen SJ
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2021 Apr; 29(8):337-344. PubMed ID: 32796371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Impact of physician specialty on classification of physician-perceived patient severity for patients with osteoarthritis.
    Bailey J; Hawker GA; Wood R; Cappelleri JC; Higgins V; Joyce N; Hsu MA
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2014 May; 22(5):647-51. PubMed ID: 24631922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. What Affects an Orthopaedic Surgeon's Online Rating? A Large-Scale, Retrospective Analysis.
    Patel MD; Williams MD; Thompson MJ; Desai PN
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev; 2022 Mar; 6(3):. PubMed ID: 35290257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Online Ratings and Reviews of American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Surgeons.
    Velasco BT; Chien B; Kwon JY; Miller CP
    Foot Ankle Spec; 2020 Feb; 13(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 30795702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Impact of Surgeon Gender on Online Physician Reviews.
    Marrero K; King E; Fingeret AL
    J Surg Res; 2020 Jan; 245():510-515. PubMed ID: 31446193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparing the Impact of Online Ratings and Report Cards on Patient Choice of Cardiac Surgeon: Large Observational Study.
    Li X; Chou SY; Deily ME; Qian M
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Oct; 23(10):e28098. PubMed ID: 34709192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reporting of Patient Experience Data on Health Systems' Websites and Commercial Physician-Rating Websites: Mixed-Methods Analysis.
    Lagu T; Norton CM; Russo LM; Priya A; Goff SL; Lindenauer PK
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Mar; 21(3):e12007. PubMed ID: 30916654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessing patient satisfaction among ABHRS surgeons: Opportunities to improve.
    Hakimi AA; Yasmeh JP; Foulad DS
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2020 Feb; 19(2):462-465. PubMed ID: 31134743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dr. Congeniality: Understanding the Importance of Surgeons' Nontechnical Skills Through 360° Feedback.
    Lanz JJ; Gregory PJ; Menendez ME; Harmon L
    J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(4):984-992. PubMed ID: 29361507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Understanding online ratings of joint arthroplasty surgeons: A national cross-sectional analysis.
    Duong JA; Tirumala SV; Martinez AS; Valentine MT; Halawi MJ
    J Clin Orthop Trauma; 2023 Apr; 39():102146. PubMed ID: 36942125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quality of information concerning cervical disc herniation on the Internet.
    Morr S; Shanti N; Carrer A; Kubeck J; Gerling MC
    Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):350-4. PubMed ID: 20362253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Web-Based Physician Ratings for California Physicians on Probation.
    Murphy GP; Awad MA; Osterberg EC; Gaither TW; Chumnarnsongkhroh T; Washington SL; Breyer BN
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Aug; 19(8):e254. PubMed ID: 28830852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.