261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28455467)
1. Risk factors for failure of the 36 mm metal-on-metal Pinnacle total hip arthroplasty system: a retrospective single-centre cohort study.
Matharu GS; Nandra RS; Berryman F; Judge A; Pynsent PB; Dunlop DJ
Bone Joint J; 2017 May; 99-B(5):592-600. PubMed ID: 28455467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is the rate of revision of 36 mm metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties with Pinnacle acetabular components related to the year of the initial operation? an interrupted time-series analysis using data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
Matharu GS; Hunt LP; Murray DW; Howard P; Pandit HG; Blom AW; Bolland B; Judge A
Bone Joint J; 2018 Jan; 100-B(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 29305448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High Revision Rate for Large-head Metal-on-metal THA at a Mean of 7.1 Years: A Registry Study.
Seppänen M; Laaksonen I; Pulkkinen P; Eskelinen A; Puhto AP; Kettunen J; Leskinen J; Manninen M; Mäkelä K
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 476(6):1223-1230. PubMed ID: 29480891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Same survival but higher rate of osteolysis for metal-on-metal Ultamet versus ceramic-on-ceramic in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty after 8 years of follow-up.
Higuchi Y; Seki T; Takegami Y; Komatsu D; Morita D; Ishiguro N
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Dec; 104(8):1155-1161. PubMed ID: 30269967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictive Factors for Revision and Survivorship Analysis of a Prevalent 36-mm Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Replacement System: A Large Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.
Pearce O; Matharu GS; Bolland BJ
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Apr; 36(4):1380-1387. PubMed ID: 33189496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Declining Revision Burden of Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasties.
Lainiala OS; Reito AP; Nieminen JJ; Eskelinen AP
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Sep; 34(9):2058-2064.e1. PubMed ID: 31174908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adverse reactions to metal debris occur with all types of hip replacement not just metal-on-metal hips: a retrospective observational study of 3340 revisions for adverse reactions to metal debris from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man.
Matharu GS; Pandit HG; Murray DW; Judge A
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Dec; 17(1):495. PubMed ID: 27955657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adverse Reactions to Metal on Metal Are Not Exclusive to Large Heads in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Lombardi AV; Berend KR; Adams JB; Satterwhite KL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):432-40. PubMed ID: 26497881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Hip Arthroplasty: Is There an Association Between Infection and Bearing Surface Type?
Pitto RP; Sedel L
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2213-8. PubMed ID: 27249955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retrospective cohort study of the performance of the Pinnacle metal on metal (MoM) total hip replacement: a single-centre investigation in combination with the findings of a national retrieval centre.
Langton DJ; Sidaginamale RP; Avery P; Waller S; Tank G; Lord J; Joyce T; Cooke N; Logishetty R; Nargol AV
BMJ Open; 2016 Apr; 6(4):e007847. PubMed ID: 27130159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High rate of infection after aseptic revision of failed metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.
Wyles CC; Van Demark RE; Sierra RJ; Trousdale RT
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Feb; 472(2):509-16. PubMed ID: 23846604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Effectiveness of Blood Metal Ions in Identifying Patients with Unilateral Birmingham Hip Resurfacing and Corail-Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants at Risk of Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris.
Matharu GS; Berryman F; Brash L; Pynsent PB; Treacy RB; Dunlop DJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Apr; 98(8):617-26. PubMed ID: 27098320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Complications Following Revision of Metal-on-Metal Versus Metal-on-Polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Nishio S; Fukunishi S; Yoshiya S; Sing DC; Hansen EN; Vail TP
Orthopedics; 2017 Jan; 40(1):e164-e169. PubMed ID: 27783837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preoperative Risk Factors Associated With Poor Outcomes of Revision Surgery for "Pseudotumors" in Patients With Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty.
Liow MH; Dimitriou D; Tsai TY; Kwon YM
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Dec; 31(12):2835-2842. PubMed ID: 27387480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty is not associated with cardiac disease.
Goodnough LH; Bala A; Huddleston J; Goodman SB; Maloney WJ; Amanatullah DF
Bone Joint J; 2018 Jan; 100-B(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 29305447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Which factors influence the rate of failure following metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty revision surgery performed for adverse reactions to metal debris? an analysis from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
Matharu GS; Judge A; Pandit HG; Murray DW
Bone Joint J; 2017 Aug; 99-B(8):1020-1027. PubMed ID: 28768778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Blood Metal Ion Thresholds to Identify Patients with Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants at Risk of Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris: An External Multicenter Validation Study of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing and Corail-Pinnacle Implants.
Matharu GS; Berryman F; Judge A; Reito A; McConnell J; Lainiala O; Young S; Eskelinen A; Pandit HG; Murray DW
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Sep; 99(18):1532-1539. PubMed ID: 28926382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty With Metasul Bearings Provides Good Results in Active Young Patients: A Concise Followup.
Delaunay CP; Putman S; Puliéro B; Bégin M; Migaud H; Bonnomet F
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2126-33. PubMed ID: 27278679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Poor Survivorship and Frequent Complications at a Median of 10 Years After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Revision.
Matharu GS; Pandit HG; Murray DW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 475(2):304-314. PubMed ID: 27188835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcomes After Metal-on-metal Hip Revision Surgery Depend on the Reason for Failure: A Propensity Score-matched Study.
Matharu GS; Judge A; Murray DW; Pandit HG
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):245-258. PubMed ID: 29529653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
