BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

508 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28455468)

  • 1. Radiographic scoring system for the evaluation of stability of cementless acetabular components in the presence of osteolysis.
    Narkbunnam R; Amanatullah DF; Electricwala AJ; Huddleston JI; Maloney WJ; Goodman SB
    Bone Joint J; 2017 May; 99-B(5):601-606. PubMed ID: 28455468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiographic and clinical analysis of cementless acetabular fixation in total hip arthroplasty.
    Zhang H; Pei FX; Yang J; Shen B; Shi R
    Chin J Traumatol; 2005 Oct; 8(5):263-8. PubMed ID: 16176755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Large acetabular defects can be managed with cementless revision components.
    Paxton ES; Keeney JA; Maloney WJ; Clohisy JC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2011 Feb; 469(2):483-93. PubMed ID: 20922585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcome of 4 Surgical Treatments for Wear and Osteolysis of Cementless Acetabular Components.
    Narkbunnam R; Amanatullah DF; Electricwala AJ; Huddleston JI; Maloney WJ; Goodman SB
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Sep; 32(9):2799-2805. PubMed ID: 28587888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fate of cementless acetabular components retained during revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Beaulé PE; Le Duff MJ; Dorey FJ; Amstutz HC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Dec; 85(12):2288-93. PubMed ID: 14668496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The diagnostic performance of radiographic criteria to detect aseptic acetabular component loosening after revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Abrahams JM; Kim YS; Callary SA; De Ieso C; Costi K; Howie DW; Solomon LB
    Bone Joint J; 2017 Apr; 99-B(4):458-464. PubMed ID: 28385934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with Retained Acetabular Component.
    Adelani MA; Mall NA; Nyazee H; Clohisy JC; Barrack RL; Nunley RM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Jun; 96(12):1015-1020. PubMed ID: 24951737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cup-cage reconstruction for severe acetabular bone loss and pelvic discontinuity: Mid-term Results of a Consecutive Series of 35 Cases.
    Hipfl C; Janz V; Löchel J; Perka C; Wassilew GI
    Bone Joint J; 2018 Nov; 100-B(11):1442-1448. PubMed ID: 30418066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Revision total hip arthroplasty for pelvic osteolysis with well-fixed cementless cup.
    Chang JD; Yoo JH; Hur M; Lee SS; Chung YK; Lee CJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Oct; 22(7):987-92. PubMed ID: 17920470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Total hip replacement with a cementless acetabular component and a cemented femoral component in patients younger than fifty years of age.
    Kim YH; Kook HK; Kim JS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 May; 84(5):770-4. PubMed ID: 12004019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Proximal translation of > 1 mm within the first two years of revision total hip arthroplasty correctly predicts whether or not an acetabular component is loose in 80% of cases: a case-control study with confirmed intra-operative outcomes.
    Kim YS; Abrahams JM; Callary SA; De Ieso C; Costi K; Howie DW; Solomon LB
    Bone Joint J; 2017 Apr; 99-B(4):465-474. PubMed ID: 28385935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Second-generation modular acetabular components provide fixation at 10 to 16 years.
    Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Feb; 470(2):366-72. PubMed ID: 21691908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The fate of stable cemented acetabular components retained during revision of a femoral component of a total hip arthroplasty.
    Berger RA; Quigley LR; Jacobs JJ; Sheinkop MB; Rosenberg AG; Galante JO
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Dec; 81(12):1682-91. PubMed ID: 10608379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The evolution of an uncemented acetabular component in alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty has improved clinical outcome: a prospective, comparative five- to 15-year follow-up study.
    García-Rey E; Cruz-Pardos A; García-Cimbrelo E
    Bone Joint J; 2017 Jun; 99-B(6):749-758. PubMed ID: 28566393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Isolated revision of an acetabular component to a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing in patients under 50 years of age.
    Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS
    Bone Joint J; 2015 Sep; 97-B(9):1197-203. PubMed ID: 26330585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Treatment of pelvic osteolysis associated with a stable acetabular component inserted without cement as part of a total hip replacement.
    Maloney WJ; Herzwurm P; Paprosky W; Rubash HE; Engh CA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Nov; 79(11):1628-34. PubMed ID: 9384421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Oblong acetabular cup, type TC, for revision total hip arthroplasty].
    Trč T; Stastný E
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2012; 79(6):506-11. PubMed ID: 23286682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical and radiological outcome of the cemented Contemporary acetabular component in patients < 50 years of age.
    Schmitz MW; Timmer C; Rijnen WH; Gardeniers JW; Schreurs BW
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Dec; 95-B(12):1617-25. PubMed ID: 24293590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Survival and polyethylene wear of porous-coated acetabular components in patients less than fifty years old: results at nine to fourteen years.
    Crowther JD; Lachiewicz PF
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 May; 84(5):729-35. PubMed ID: 12004013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cementless acetabular revision. Evaluation at an average of 10.5 years.
    Leopold SS; Rosenberg AG; Bhatt RD; Sheinkop MB; Quigley LR; Galante JO
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Dec; (369):179-86. PubMed ID: 10611873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.