BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28456098)

  • 1. Intentional switching in auditory selective attention: Exploring age-related effects in a spatial setup requiring speech perception.
    Oberem J; Koch I; Fels J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jun; 177():36-43. PubMed ID: 28456098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intentional switching in auditory selective attention: Exploring attention shifts with different reverberation times.
    Oberem J; Seibold J; Koch I; Fels J
    Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():32-39. PubMed ID: 29305038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Examining age-related differences in auditory attention control using a task-switching procedure.
    Lawo V; Koch I
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2014 Mar; 69(2):237-44. PubMed ID: 23197343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Time course and cost of misdirecting auditory spatial attention in younger and older adults.
    Singh G; Pichora-Fuller MK; Schneider BA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):711-21. PubMed ID: 24165300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring temporal dissipation of attention settings in auditory task switching.
    Koch I; Lawo V
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Jan; 76(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 24163154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intentional attention switching in dichotic listening: exploring the efficiency of nonspatial and spatial selection.
    Lawo V; Fels J; Oberem J; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Oct; 67(10):2010-24. PubMed ID: 25248101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Switching of auditory attention in "cocktail-party" listening: ERP evidence of cueing effects in younger and older adults.
    Getzmann S; Jasny J; Falkenstein M
    Brain Cogn; 2017 Feb; 111():1-12. PubMed ID: 27814564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intentional preparation of auditory attention-switches: Explicit cueing and sequential switch-predictability.
    Seibold JC; Nolden S; Oberem J; Fels J; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Jun; 71(6):1382-1395. PubMed ID: 28631530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The persisting influence of unattended auditory information: Negative priming in intentional auditory attention switching.
    Eben C; Koch I; Jolicoeur P; Nolden S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1835-1846. PubMed ID: 31898070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of crossmodal competition and dimensional overlap in crossmodal attention switching.
    Kreutzfeldt M; Stephan DN; Sturm W; Willmes K; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Feb; 155():67-76. PubMed ID: 25577489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. EEG activity evoked in preparation for multi-talker listening by adults and children.
    Holmes E; Kitterick PT; Summerfield AQ
    Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():83-100. PubMed ID: 27178442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Focused and divided attention in a simulated cocktail-party situation: ERP evidence from younger and older adults.
    Getzmann S; Golob EJ; Wascher E
    Neurobiol Aging; 2016 May; 41():138-149. PubMed ID: 27103527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What does successful speech-in-noise perception in aging depend on? Electrophysiological correlates of high and low performance in older adults.
    Getzmann S; Wascher E; Falkenstein M
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Apr; 70():43-57. PubMed ID: 25681737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visually guided auditory attention in a dynamic "cocktail-party" speech perception task: ERP evidence for age-related differences.
    Getzmann S; Wascher E
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():98-108. PubMed ID: 27825858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Switching in the cocktail party: exploring intentional control of auditory selective attention.
    Koch I; Lawo V; Fels J; Vorländer M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1140-7. PubMed ID: 21553997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ERP correlates of auditory goal-directed behavior of younger and older adults in a dynamic speech perception task.
    Getzmann S; Falkenstein M; Wascher E
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 278():435-45. PubMed ID: 25447300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. I can see what you are saying: Auditory labels reduce visual search times.
    Cho KW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Oct; 170():19-31. PubMed ID: 27341509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cueing listeners to attend to a target talker progressively improves word report as the duration of the cue-target interval lengthens to 2,000 ms.
    Holmes E; Kitterick PT; Summerfield AQ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1520-1538. PubMed ID: 29696570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the Performance of a Visually Guided Hearing Aid Using a Dynamic Auditory-Visual Word Congruence Task.
    Roverud E; Best V; Mason CR; Streeter T; Kidd G
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):756-769. PubMed ID: 29252977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dissociable effects of auditory attention switching and stimulus-response compatibility.
    Lawo V; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2014; 78(3):379-86. PubMed ID: 24526242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.