These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

558 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28456557)

  • 1. No post-no core approach to restore severely damaged posterior teeth: An up to 10-year retrospective study of documented endocrown cases.
    Belleflamme MM; Geerts SO; Louwette MM; Grenade CF; Vanheusden AJ; Mainjot AK
    J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():1-7. PubMed ID: 28456557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of endocrowns made of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic or polymer-infiltrated ceramic networks and direct composite resin restorations: fatigue performance and stress distribution.
    Dartora G; Rocha Pereira GK; Varella de Carvalho R; Zucuni CP; Valandro LF; Cesar PF; Caldas RA; Bacchi A
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Dec; 100():103401. PubMed ID: 31445400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Restoration of severely damaged endodontically treated premolars: The influence of the endo-core length on marginal integrity and fatigue resistance of lithium disilicate CAD-CAM ceramic endocrowns.
    Rocca GT; Daher R; Saratti CM; Sedlacek R; Suchy T; Feilzer AJ; Krejci I
    J Dent; 2018 Jan; 68():41-50. PubMed ID: 29107134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Features of fracture of prosthetic tooth-endocrown constructions by means of acoustic emission analysis.
    Skalskyi V; Makeev V; Stankevych O; Pavlychko R
    Dent Mater; 2018 Mar; 34(3):e46-e55. PubMed ID: 29409675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of feldspathic and polymer-infiltrated ceramic network CAD/CAM endocrowns for maxillary premolars.
    Saglam G; Cengiz S; Karacaer O
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Jan; 23(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 31929199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New material perspective for endocrown restorations: effects on mechanical performance and fracture behavior.
    Sedrez-Porto JA; Münchow EA; Valente LL; Cenci MS; Pereira-Cenci T
    Braz Oral Res; 2019 Feb; 33():e012. PubMed ID: 30758409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of clinical efficacy of CAD CAM Endocrowns made of feldspathic ceramic, zirconia lithium silicate, and lithium disilicate: A two-year mixed cohort study.
    Jalali S; Asgari N; Pirooz P; Younespour S; Atri F
    J Dent; 2024 Oct; 149():105019. PubMed ID: 38670333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical risk factors related to failures with zirconia-based restorations: an up to 9-year retrospective study.
    Koenig V; Vanheusden AJ; Le Goff SO; Mainjot AK
    J Dent; 2013 Dec; 41(12):1164-74. PubMed ID: 24135294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premolars using different preparation designs and CAD/CAM materials.
    Pedrollo Lise D; Van Ende A; De Munck J; Umeda Suzuki TY; Cardoso Vieira LC; Van Meerbeek B
    J Dent; 2017 Apr; 59():54-61. PubMed ID: 28214537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preparation Ferrule Design Effect on Endocrown Failure Resistance.
    Einhorn M; DuVall N; Wajdowicz M; Brewster J; Roberts H
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e237-e242. PubMed ID: 28985446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fracture resistance and failure modes of polymer infiltrated ceramic endocrown restorations with variations in margin design and occlusal thickness.
    Taha D; Spintzyk S; Schille C; Sabet A; Wahsh M; Salah T; Geis-Gerstorfer J
    J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jul; 62(3):293-297. PubMed ID: 29241944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Strength comparison of anterior teeth restored with ceramic endocrowns vs custom-made post and cores.
    Dejak B; Młotkowski A
    J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Apr; 62(2):171-176. PubMed ID: 28886951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective clinical evaluation of 765 partial glass-ceramic posterior restorations luted using photo-polymerized resin composite in conjunction with immediate dentin sealing.
    Van den Breemer CRG; Buijs GJ; Cune MS; Özcan M; Kerdijk W; Van der Made S; Gresnigt MMM
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Mar; 25(3):1463-1473. PubMed ID: 32785851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of occlusal reduction design on the fracture resistance and biomechanical behavior of endocrowns restoring maxillary premolars.
    Abbas MH; Elerian FA; Elsherbiny AA; Elgohary NMM; Atout A
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jan; 24(1):113. PubMed ID: 38243249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fracture resistance and failure modes of endocrowns manufactured with different CAD/CAM materials under axial and lateral loading.
    El Ghoul W; Özcan M; Silwadi M; Salameh Z
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2019 Jul; 31(4):378-387. PubMed ID: 31067007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of the type of post and core on in vitro marginal continuity, fracture resistance, and fracture mode of lithia disilicate-based all-ceramic crowns.
    Forberger N; Göhring TN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Oct; 100(4):264-73. PubMed ID: 18922255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical Assessment of Restored Mandibular Molar by Endocrown in Comparison to a Glass Fiber Post-Retained Conventional Crown: 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Helal MA; Wang Z
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Dec; 28(9):988-996. PubMed ID: 29067737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Endocrowns Clinical Performance and Patient Satisfaction: A Randomized Clinical Trial of Three Monolithic Ceramic Restorations.
    El-Ma'aita A; A Al-Rabab'ah M; Abu-Awwad M; Hattar S; Devlin H
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jan; 31(1):30-37. PubMed ID: 34378269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic fatigue and fracture resistance of non-retentive all-ceramic full-coverage molar restorations. Influence of ceramic material and preparation design.
    Clausen JO; Abou Tara M; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2010 Jun; 26(6):533-8. PubMed ID: 20181388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with different endocrown designs and materials after artificial ageing.
    Ahmed MAA; Kern M; Mourshed B; Wille S; Chaar MS
    J Prosthodont Res; 2022 Jan; 66(1):141-150. PubMed ID: 34108294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.