These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28457278)

  • 1. Accuracy of a computed tomography scanning procedure to manufacture digital models.
    Darroudi AM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Ongkosuwito EM; Suttorp CM; Bronkhorst EM; Breuning KH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 May; 151(5):995-1003. PubMed ID: 28457278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of virtual and manual tooth setups with digital and plaster models in extraction cases.
    Im J; Cha JY; Lee KJ; Yu HS; Hwang CJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Apr; 145(4):434-42. PubMed ID: 24703281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of dental measurements between conventional plaster models, digital models obtained by impression scanning and plaster model scanning.
    Gül Amuk N; Karsli E; Kurt G
    Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):151-158. PubMed ID: 30772351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
    Leifert MF; Leifert MM; Efstratiadis SS; Cangialosi TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of intra-arch and interarch measurements from digital models with 2 impression materials and a modeling process based on cone-beam computed tomography.
    White AJ; Fallis DW; Vandewalle KS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):456.e1-9; discussion 456-7. PubMed ID: 20362900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Agreement of in vitro orthodontic measurements on dental plaster casts and digital models using Maestro 3D ortho studio software.
    Rafiei E; Haerian A; Fadaei Tehrani P; Shokrollahi M
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2022 Oct; 8(5):1149-1157. PubMed ID: 35719020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intra-observer reliability and agreement of manual and digital orthodontic model analysis.
    Koretsi V; Tingelhoff L; Proff P; Kirschneck C
    Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jan; 40(1):52-57. PubMed ID: 28531341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of digital dental models using the low-cost DAVID laser scanner.
    Olszewski R; Szyper-Szczurowska J; Opach M; Bednarczyk P; Zapala J; Szczepanik S
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2019 Dec; 28(12):1647-1656. PubMed ID: 31778603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurements using orthodontic analysis software on digital models obtained by 3D scans of plaster casts : Intrarater reliability and validity.
    Czarnota J; Hey J; Fuhrmann R
    J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jan; 77(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 26753549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital models: How can dental arch form be verified chairside?
    Tavares A; Braga E; Araújo TM
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2017; 22(6):68-73. PubMed ID: 29364382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing agreement in measurements of orthodontic study models: Digital caliper on plaster models vs 3-dimensional software on models scanned by structured-light scanner.
    Wan Hassan WN; Othman SA; Chan CS; Ahmad R; Ali SN; Abd Rohim A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):886-895. PubMed ID: 27871715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing the reliability and accuracy of clinical measurements using plaster model and the digital model system based on crowding severity.
    Liang YM; Rutchakitprakarn L; Kuang SH; Wu TY
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2018 Sep; 81(9):842-847. PubMed ID: 29395944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of orthodontic measurements on dental plaster casts and 3D scans.
    Radeke J; von der Wense C; Lapatki BG
    J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Jul; 75(4):264-74. PubMed ID: 24996855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic accuracy of impression-free digital models.
    Akyalcin S; Cozad BE; English JD; Colville CD; Laman S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):916-22. PubMed ID: 24286915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of a software program for applying the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system to digital casts.
    Hildebrand JC; Palomo JM; Palomo L; Sivik M; Hans M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):283-9. PubMed ID: 18249296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methodological accuracy of digital and manual model analysis in orthodontics - A retrospective clinical study.
    Lippold C; Kirschneck C; Schreiber K; Abukiress S; Tahvildari A; Moiseenko T; Danesh G
    Comput Biol Med; 2015 Jul; 62():103-9. PubMed ID: 25917690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Space analysis: a comparison between sonic digitization (DigiGraph Workstation) and the digital caliper.
    Mok KH; Cooke MS
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Dec; 20(6):653-61. PubMed ID: 9926633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts.
    Okunami TR; Kusnoto B; BeGole E; Evans CA; Sadowsky C; Fadavi S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 17208106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Photographs of dental casts or digital models: rating dental arch relationships in bilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Leenarts CM; Bartzela TN; Bronkhorst EM; Semb G; Shaw WC; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 41(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 22154575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital model analysis for the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system for dental casts.
    Costalos PA; Sarraf K; Cangialosi TJ; Efstratiadis S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):624-9. PubMed ID: 16286210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.