329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28457836)
1. Imaging of current flow in the human head during transcranial electrical therapy.
Kasinadhuni AK; Indahlastari A; Chauhan M; Schär M; Mareci TH; Sadleir RJ
Brain Stimul; 2017; 10(4):764-772. PubMed ID: 28457836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Current Density Imaging During Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Using DT-MRI and MREIT: Algorithm Development and Numerical Simulations.
Kwon OI; Sajib SZ; Sersa I; Oh TI; Jeong WC; Kim HJ; Woo EJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2016 Jan; 63(1):168-75. PubMed ID: 26111387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Software Toolbox for Low-Frequency Conductivity and Current Density Imaging Using MRI.
Sajib SZK; Katoch N; Kim HJ; Kwon OI; Woo EJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 64(11):2505-2514. PubMed ID: 28767360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of Electrode Drift in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
Woods AJ; Bryant V; Sacchetti D; Gervits F; Hamilton R
Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(3):515-9. PubMed ID: 25583653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Benchmarking transcranial electrical stimulation finite element models: a comparison study.
Indahlastari A; Chauhan M; Sadleir RJ
J Neural Eng; 2019 Apr; 16(2):026019. PubMed ID: 30605892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of electrode-electrolyte spatial mismatch on transcranial direct current stimulation: a finite element modeling study.
Chen L; Zou X; Tang R; Ke A; He J
J Neural Eng; 2019 Aug; 16(5):056012. PubMed ID: 31195379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Methods to Compare Predicted and Observed Phosphene Experience in tACS Subjects.
Indahlastari A; Kasinadhuni AK; Saar C; Castellano K; Mousa B; Chauhan M; Mareci TH; Sadleir RJ
Neural Plast; 2018; 2018():8525706. PubMed ID: 30627150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Changing head model extent affects finite element predictions of transcranial direct current stimulation distributions.
Indahlastari A; Chauhan M; Schwartz B; Sadleir RJ
J Neural Eng; 2016 Dec; 13(6):066006. PubMed ID: 27705955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spatial and polarity precision of concentric high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS).
Alam M; Truong DQ; Khadka N; Bikson M
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jun; 61(12):4506-21. PubMed ID: 27223853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cortical Excitability through Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: a Computational Approach.
Arora Y; Chowdhury SR
J Med Syst; 2020 Jan; 44(2):48. PubMed ID: 31900599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiscale coupling of transcranial direct current stimulation to neuron electrodynamics: modeling the influence of the transcranial electric field on neuronal depolarization.
Dougherty ET; Turner JC; Vogel F
Comput Math Methods Med; 2014; 2014():360179. PubMed ID: 25404950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transcranial electrical stimulation motor threshold can estimate individualized tDCS dosage from reverse-calculation electric-field modeling.
Caulfield KA; Badran BW; DeVries WH; Summers PM; Kofmehl E; Li X; Borckardt JJ; Bikson M; George MS
Brain Stimul; 2020; 13(4):961-969. PubMed ID: 32330607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional forward solver and its performance analysis for magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) using recessed electrodes.
Lee BI; Oh SH; Woo EJ; Lee SY; Cho MH; Kwon O; Seo JK; Lee JY; Baek WS
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Jul; 48(13):1971-86. PubMed ID: 12884929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Focused current density imaging using internal electrode in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT).
Jeong WC; Sajib S; Kim HJ; Kwon OI
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2014 Jul; 61(7):1938-46. PubMed ID: 24956612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A simple method for EEG guided transcranial electrical stimulation without models.
Cancelli A; Cottone C; Tecchio F; Truong DQ; Dmochowski J; Bikson M
J Neural Eng; 2016 Jun; 13(3):036022. PubMed ID: 27172063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of large structural brain changes in chronic stroke patients on the electric field caused by transcranial brain stimulation.
Minjoli S; Saturnino GB; Blicher JU; Stagg CJ; Siebner HR; Antunes A; Thielscher A
Neuroimage Clin; 2017; 15():106-117. PubMed ID: 28516033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Towards precise brain stimulation: Is electric field simulation related to neuromodulation?
Antonenko D; Thielscher A; Saturnino GB; Aydin S; Ittermann B; Grittner U; Flöel A
Brain Stimul; 2019; 12(5):1159-1168. PubMed ID: 30930209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transcranial direct current stimulation in patients after decompressive craniectomy: a finite element model to investigate factors affecting the cortical electric field.
Sun W; Dong X; Yu G; Shuai L; Yuan Y; Ma C
J Int Med Res; 2021 Feb; 49(2):300060520942112. PubMed ID: 33788619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost of focality in TDCS: Interindividual variability in electric fields.
Mikkonen M; Laakso I; Tanaka S; Hirata A
Brain Stimul; 2020; 13(1):117-124. PubMed ID: 31606449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Human in-vivo brain magnetic resonance current density imaging (MRCDI).
Göksu C; Hanson LG; Siebner HR; Ehses P; Scheffler K; Thielscher A
Neuroimage; 2018 May; 171():26-39. PubMed ID: 29288869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
