BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28458054)

  • 1. A Bayesian interval dose-finding design addressingOckham's razor: mTPI-2.
    Guo W; Wang SJ; Yang S; Lynn H; Ji Y
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2017 Jul; 58():23-33. PubMed ID: 28458054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A modified toxicity probability interval method for dose-finding trials.
    Ji Y; Liu P; Li Y; Bekele BN
    Clin Trials; 2010 Dec; 7(6):653-63. PubMed ID: 20935021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of toxicity probability interval based designs in contrast to the continual reassessment method.
    Horton BJ; Wages NA; Conaway MR
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 27435150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative review of novel model-assisted designs for phase I clinical trials.
    Zhou H; Murray TA; Pan H; Yuan Y
    Stat Med; 2018 Jun; 37(14):2208-2222. PubMed ID: 29682777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. STEIN: A simple toxicity and efficacy interval design for seamless phase I/II clinical trials.
    Lin R; Yin G
    Stat Med; 2017 Nov; 36(26):4106-4120. PubMed ID: 28786138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Keyboard: A Novel Bayesian Toxicity Probability Interval Design for Phase I Clinical Trials.
    Yan F; Mandrekar SJ; Yuan Y
    Clin Cancer Res; 2017 Aug; 23(15):3994-4003. PubMed ID: 28546227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bayesian Optimal Interval Design: A Simple and Well-Performing Design for Phase I Oncology Trials.
    Yuan Y; Hess KR; Hilsenbeck SG; Gilbert MR
    Clin Cancer Res; 2016 Sep; 22(17):4291-301. PubMed ID: 27407096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modified toxicity probability interval design: a safer and more reliable method than the 3 + 3 design for practical phase I trials.
    Ji Y; Wang SJ
    J Clin Oncol; 2013 May; 31(14):1785-91. PubMed ID: 23569307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A dose-finding approach based on shrunken predictive probability for combinations of two agents in phase I trials.
    Hirakawa A; Hamada C; Matsui S
    Stat Med; 2013 Nov; 32(26):4515-25. PubMed ID: 23650098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy, Safety, and Reliability of Novel Phase I Trial Designs.
    Zhou H; Yuan Y; Nie L
    Clin Cancer Res; 2018 Sep; 24(18):4357-4364. PubMed ID: 29661774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. R-TPI: rolling toxicity probability interval design to shorten the duration and maintain safety of phase I trials.
    Guo W; Ji Y; Li D
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(3):411-424. PubMed ID: 30744484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Probability intervals of toxicity and efficacy design for dose-finding clinical trials in oncology.
    Lin X; Ji Y
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Mar; 30(3):843-856. PubMed ID: 33327870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Design considerations for phase I/II dose finding clinical trials in Immuno-oncology and cell therapy.
    Liu R; Lin J; Li P
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2020 Sep; 96():106083. PubMed ID: 32659438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Phase I trial design for drug combinations with Bayesian model averaging.
    Jin IH; Huo L; Yin G; Yuan Y
    Pharm Stat; 2015; 14(2):108-19. PubMed ID: 25641851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of phase I dose-finding designs in clinical trials with monotonicity assumption violation.
    Abbas R; Rossoni C; Jaki T; Paoletti X; Mozgunov P
    Clin Trials; 2020 Oct; 17(5):522-534. PubMed ID: 32631095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Uniformly most powerful Bayesian interval design for phase I dose-finding trials.
    Lin R; Yin G
    Pharm Stat; 2018 Nov; 17(6):710-724. PubMed ID: 30066466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A novel Bayesian seamless phase I/II design.
    Pan H; Huang P; Wang Z; Wang L; Li C; Xia J
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e73060. PubMed ID: 24023809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the relative efficiency of model-assisted designs: a conditional approach.
    Lin R; Yuan Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(4):648-662. PubMed ID: 31258039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Bayesian dose finding design for dual endpoint phase I trials.
    Loke YC; Tan SB; Cai Y; Machin D
    Stat Med; 2006 Jan; 25(1):3-22. PubMed ID: 16013039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bayesian dose-finding designs for combination of molecularly targeted agents assuming partial stochastic ordering.
    Guo B; Li Y
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(5):859-75. PubMed ID: 25413162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.