239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28459285)
21. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner.
Flügge TV; Schlager S; Nelson K; Nahles S; Metzger MC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Sep; 144(3):471-8. PubMed ID: 23992820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Accuracy of Dental Monitoring 3D digital dental models using photograph and video mode.
Morris RS; Hoye LN; Elnagar MH; Atsawasuwan P; Galang-Boquiren MT; Caplin J; Viana GC; Obrez A; Kusnoto B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Sep; 156(3):420-428. PubMed ID: 31474272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy.
Keating AP; Knox J; Bibb R; Zhurov AI
J Orthod; 2008 Sep; 35(3):191-201; discussion 175. PubMed ID: 18809782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of 3-dimensional printing technologies on the precision, trueness, and accuracy of printed retainers.
Naeem OA; Bencharit S; Yang IH; Stilianoudakis SC; Carrico C; Tüfekçi E
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Apr; 161(4):582-591. PubMed ID: 35337648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of dental models fabricated using additive manufacturing methods.
Jin SJ; Jeong ID; Kim JH; Kim WC
Int J Comput Dent; 2018; 21(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 29967903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparing the accuracy (trueness and precision) of models of fixed dental prostheses fabricated by digital and conventional workflows.
Sim JY; Jang Y; Kim WC; Kim HY; Lee DH; Kim JH
J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Jan; 63(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 29615324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of the accuracy of implants placed with CAD-CAM surgical templates manufactured with various 3D printers: An in vitro study.
Herschdorfer L; Negreiros WM; Gallucci GO; Hamilton A
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):905-910. PubMed ID: 32499166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Accuracy of five intraoral scanners compared to indirect digitalization.
Güth JF; Runkel C; Beuer F; Stimmelmayr M; Edelhoff D; Keul C
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jun; 21(5):1445-1455. PubMed ID: 27406138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Accuracy of 3D Printed Models Created by Two Technologies of Printers with Different Designs of Model Base.
Rungrojwittayakul O; Kan JY; Shiozaki K; Swamidass RS; Goodacre BJ; Goodacre CJ; Lozada JL
J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):124-128. PubMed ID: 31498957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons.
Renne W; Ludlow M; Fryml J; Schurch Z; Mennito A; Kessler R; Lauer A
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 28024822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Accuracy of Three Digitization Methods for the Dental Arch with Various Tooth Preparation Designs: An In Vitro Study.
Oh KC; Lee B; Park YB; Moon HS
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 30427097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Deviations in palatal region between indirect and direct digital models: an in vivo study.
Zhongpeng Y; Tianmin X; Ruoping J
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):66. PubMed ID: 31029133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Accuracy of three intraoral scans for primary impressions of edentulous jaws].
Cao Y; Chen JK; Deng KH; Wang Y; Sun YC; Zhao YJ
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Feb; 52(1):129-137. PubMed ID: 32071476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Trueness and precision of digital impressions obtained using an intraoral scanner with different head size in the partially edentulous mandible.
Hayama H; Fueki K; Wadachi J; Wakabayashi N
J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jul; 62(3):347-352. PubMed ID: 29502933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of intaglio surface trueness and margin quality of interim crowns in accordance with the build angle of stereolithography apparatus 3-dimensional printing.
Yu BY; Son K; Lee KB
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Aug; 126(2):231-237. PubMed ID: 32807402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness.
Persson AS; Odén A; Andersson M; Sandborgh-Englund G
Dent Mater; 2009 Jul; 25(7):929-36. PubMed ID: 19264353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Accuracy of printed casts generated from digital implant impressions versus stone casts from conventional implant impressions: A comparative in vitro study.
Alshawaf B; Weber HP; Finkelman M; El Rafie K; Kudara Y; Papaspyridakos P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Aug; 29(8):835-842. PubMed ID: 29926977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of the trueness and precision of eight extraoral laboratory scanners with a complete-arch model: a three-dimensional analysis.
Emir F; Ayyıldız S
J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Oct; 63(4):434-439. PubMed ID: 30954395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of trueness and precision of stereolithography-fabricated photopolymer-resin dentures under different postpolymerization conditions: An in vitro study.
Katheng A; Kanazawa M; Iwaki M; Arakida T; Hada T; Minakuchi S
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):514-520. PubMed ID: 33583615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The effects of additive manufacturing technologies and finish line designs on the trueness and dimensional stability of 3D-printed dies.
Lai YC; Yang CC; Levon JA; Chu TG; Morton D; Lin WS
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jul; 32(6):519-526. PubMed ID: 35962924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
