These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28459556)
1. Pred-Skin: A Fast and Reliable Web Application to Assess Skin Sensitization Effect of Chemicals. Braga RC; Alves VM; Muratov EN; Strickland J; Kleinstreuer N; Trospsha A; Andrade CH J Chem Inf Model; 2017 May; 57(5):1013-1017. PubMed ID: 28459556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pred-Skin: A Web Portal for Accurate Prediction of Human Skin Sensitizers. Borba JVB; Braga RC; Alves VM; Muratov EN; Kleinstreuer N; Tropsha A; Andrade CH Chem Res Toxicol; 2021 Feb; 34(2):258-267. PubMed ID: 32673477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Compilation of historical local lymph node data for evaluation of skin sensitization alternative methods. Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Kern PS; Schlatter H; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Patlewicz GY; Basketter DA Dermatitis; 2005 Dec; 16(4):157-202. PubMed ID: 16536334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Novel approach for classifying chemicals according to skin sensitizing potency by non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay. Takeyoshi M; Iida K; Shiraishi K; Hoshuyama S J Appl Toxicol; 2005; 25(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 15744759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Application of BALB/c mouse in the local lymph node assay:BrdU-ELISA for the prediction of the skin sensitizing potential of chemicals. Hou F; Xing C; Li B; Cheng J; Chen W; Zhang M J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2015; 72():53-8. PubMed ID: 25600862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An in vitro human skin test for assessing sensitization potential. Ahmed SS; Wang XN; Fielding M; Kerry A; Dickinson I; Munuswamy R; Kimber I; Dickinson AM J Appl Toxicol; 2016 May; 36(5):669-84. PubMed ID: 26251951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative relationship between the local lymph node assay and human skin sensitization assays. Schneider K; Akkan Z Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2004 Jun; 39(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 15135206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A quantitative in silico model for predicting skin sensitization using a nearest neighbours approach within expert-derived structure-activity alert spaces. Canipa SJ; Chilton ML; Hemingway R; Macmillan DS; Myden A; Plante JP; Tennant RE; Vessey JD; Steger-Hartmann T; Gould J; Hillegass J; Etter S; Smith BPC; White A; Sterchele P; De Smedt A; O'Brien D; Parakhia R J Appl Toxicol; 2017 Aug; 37(8):985-995. PubMed ID: 28244128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of a peptide reactivity assay for screening contact allergens. Gerberick GF; Vassallo JD; Bailey RE; Chaney JG; Morrall SW; Lepoittevin JP Toxicol Sci; 2004 Oct; 81(2):332-43. PubMed ID: 15254333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Local lymph node assay (LLNA) for detection of sensitization capacity of chemicals. Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I Methods; 2007 Jan; 41(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 16938465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer models versus reality: how well do in silico models currently predict the sensitization potential of a substance. Teubner W; Mehling A; Schuster PX; Guth K; Worth A; Burton J; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Dec; 67(3):468-85. PubMed ID: 24090701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Non-enzymatic glutathione reactivity and in vitro toxicity: a non-animal approach to skin sensitization. Aptula AO; Patlewicz G; Roberts DW; Schultz TW Toxicol In Vitro; 2006 Mar; 20(2):239-47. PubMed ID: 16112535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of skin sensitization potency using machine learning approaches. Zang Q; Paris M; Lehmann DM; Bell S; Kleinstreuer N; Allen D; Matheson J; Jacobs A; Casey W; Strickland J J Appl Toxicol; 2017 Jul; 37(7):792-805. PubMed ID: 28074598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimating skin sensitization potency from a single dose LLNA. Roberts DW Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Apr; 71(3):437-43. PubMed ID: 25625585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contact allergenic potency: correlation of human and local lymph node assay data. Gerberick GF; Robinson MK; Ryan CA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Basketter DA; Wright Z; Marks JG Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Sep; 12(3):156-61. PubMed ID: 11526521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting chemically-induced skin reactions. Part I: QSAR models of skin sensitization and their application to identify potentially hazardous compounds. Alves VM; Muratov E; Fourches D; Strickland J; Kleinstreuer N; Andrade CH; Tropsha A Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2015 Apr; 284(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 25560674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Integrated decision strategies for skin sensitization hazard. Strickland J; Zang Q; Kleinstreuer N; Paris M; Lehmann DM; Choksi N; Matheson J; Jacobs A; Lowit A; Allen D; Casey W J Appl Toxicol; 2016 Sep; 36(9):1150-62. PubMed ID: 26851134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A chemical dataset for evaluation of alternative approaches to skin-sensitization testing. Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Kern PS; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Patlewicz GY; Basketter DA Contact Dermatitis; 2004 May; 50(5):274-88. PubMed ID: 15209809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predicting chemically-induced skin reactions. Part II: QSAR models of skin permeability and the relationships between skin permeability and skin sensitization. Alves VM; Muratov E; Fourches D; Strickland J; Kleinstreuer N; Andrade CH; Tropsha A Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2015 Apr; 284(2):273-80. PubMed ID: 25560673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]