These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

465 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28460638)

  • 1. Using patient values and preferences to inform the importance of health outcomes in practice guideline development following the GRADE approach.
    Zhang Y; Coello PA; Brożek J; Wiercioch W; Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I; Akl EA; Meerpohl JJ; Alhazzani W; Carrasco-Labra A; Morgan RL; Mustafa RA; Riva JJ; Moore A; Yepes-Nuñez JJ; Cuello-Garcia C; AlRayees Z; Manja V; Falavigna M; Neumann I; Brignardello-Petersen R; Santesso N; Rochwerg B; Darzi A; Rojas MX; Adi Y; Bollig C; Waziry R; Schünemann HJ
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 May; 15(1):52. PubMed ID: 28460638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Synthesis, grading, and presentation of evidence in guidelines: article 7 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.
    Guyatt G; Akl EA; Oxman A; Wilson K; Puhan MA; Wilt T; Gutterman D; Woodhead M; Antman EM; Schünemann HJ;
    Proc Am Thorac Soc; 2012 Dec; 9(5):256-61. PubMed ID: 23256168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Deciding what type of evidence and outcomes to include in guidelines: article 5 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.
    Wilt TJ; Guyatt G; Kunz R; Macnee W; Puhan MA; Viegi G; Woodhead M; Akl EA; Schünemann HJ;
    Proc Am Thorac Soc; 2012 Dec; 9(5):243-50. PubMed ID: 23256166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Moving from evidence to developing recommendations in guidelines: article 11 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.
    Schünemann HJ; Oxman AD; Akl EA; Brozek JL; Montori VM; Heffner J; Hill S; Woodhead M; Campos-Outcalt D; Alderson P; Woitalla T; Puhan MA; Falck-Ytter Y; Bousquet J; Guyatt G;
    Proc Am Thorac Soc; 2012 Dec; 9(5):282-92. PubMed ID: 23256172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks for adoption, adaptation, and de novo development of trustworthy recommendations: GRADE-ADOLOPMENT.
    Schünemann HJ; Wiercioch W; Brozek J; Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I; Mustafa RA; Manja V; Brignardello-Petersen R; Neumann I; Falavigna M; Alhazzani W; Santesso N; Zhang Y; Meerpohl JJ; Morgan RL; Rochwerg B; Darzi A; Rojas MX; Carrasco-Labra A; Adi Y; AlRayees Z; Riva J; Bollig C; Moore A; Yepes-Nuñez JJ; Cuello C; Waziry R; Akl EA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 81():101-110. PubMed ID: 27713072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [GRADE: Using evidence to decision frameworks for adoption, adaptation and de novo generation of trustworthy guideline recommendations - GRADE-ADOLOPMENT].
    Kallenbach M; Conrad S; Hoffmann F; Matthias K; Gartlehner G; Langer G; Meerpohl J
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2019 Aug; 144-145():90-99. PubMed ID: 31399391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Role of patient preferences in clinical practice guidelines: a multiple methods study using guidelines from oncology as a case.
    Gärtner FR; Portielje JE; Langendam M; Hairwassers D; Agoritsas T; Gijsen B; Liefers GJ; Pieterse AH; Stiggelbout AM
    BMJ Open; 2019 Dec; 9(12):e032483. PubMed ID: 31811009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Making the GRADE in anaphylaxis management: Toward recommendations integrating values, preferences, context, and shared decision making.
    Shaker MS; Oppenheimer J; Wallace DV; Golden DBK; Lang DM; ; ; Lang ES; Bernstein JA; Campbell RL; Chu D; Dinakar C; Ellis AK; Greenhawt M; Horner C; Lieberman JA; Rank MA; Stukus DR; Wang J
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2020 Jun; 124(6):526-535.e2. PubMed ID: 32199979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. GRADE Guidelines: 19. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences-Risk of bias and indirectness.
    Zhang Y; Alonso-Coello P; Guyatt GH; Yepes-Nuñez JJ; Akl EA; Hazlewood G; Pardo-Hernandez H; Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I; Qaseem A; Williams JW; Tugwell P; Flottorp S; Chang Y; Zhang Y; Mustafa RA; Rojas MX; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jul; 111():94-104. PubMed ID: 29452223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Integrating values and consumer involvement in guidelines with the patient at the center: article 8 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.
    Kelson M; Akl EA; Bastian H; Cluzeau F; Curtis JR; Guyatt G; Montori VM; Oliver S; Schünemann HJ;
    Proc Am Thorac Soc; 2012 Dec; 9(5):262-8. PubMed ID: 23256169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Integrative assessment of evidence in healthcare: the GRADE system].
    Schünemann H
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2009; 103(5):261-8. PubMed ID: 19645339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. GRADE guidelines: 20. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences-inconsistency, imprecision, and other domains.
    Zhang Y; Coello PA; Guyatt GH; Yepes-Nuñez JJ; Akl EA; Hazlewood G; Pardo-Hernandez H; Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I; Qaseem A; Williams JW; Tugwell P; Flottorp S; Chang Y; Zhang Y; Mustafa RA; Rojas MX; Xie F; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jul; 111():83-93. PubMed ID: 29800687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [GRADE: Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks - a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: Clinical guidelines].
    Conrad S; Kaiser L; Kallenbach M; Meerpohl J; Morche J
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2019 Mar; 140():63-73. PubMed ID: 30857745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Qualitative Evidence Synthesis (QES) for Guidelines: Paper 2 - Using qualitative evidence synthesis findings to inform evidence-to-decision frameworks and recommendations.
    Lewin S; Glenton C; Lawrie TA; Downe S; Finlayson KW; Rosenbaum S; Barreix M; Tunçalp Ö
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2019 Aug; 17(1):75. PubMed ID: 31391119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. GRADE guidelines system is reproducible when instructions are clearly operationalized even among the guidelines panel members with limited experience with GRADE.
    Kumar A; Miladinovic B; Guyatt GH; Schünemann HJ; Djulbegovic B
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jul; 75():115-8. PubMed ID: 26845745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The GRADE evidence-to-decision framework: a report of its testing and application in 15 international guideline panels.
    Neumann I; Brignardello-Petersen R; Wiercioch W; Carrasco-Labra A; Cuello C; Akl E; Mustafa RA; Al-Hazzani W; Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I; Rojas MX; Falavigna M; Santesso N; Brozek J; Iorio A; Alonso-Coello P; Schünemann HJ
    Implement Sci; 2016 Jul; 11():93. PubMed ID: 27417219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines part 3 of 3. The GRADE approach to developing recommendations.
    Brożek JL; Akl EA; Compalati E; Kreis J; Terracciano L; Fiocchi A; Ueffing E; Andrews J; Alonso-Coello P; Meerpohl JJ; Lang DM; Jaeschke R; Williams JW; Phillips B; Lethaby A; Bossuyt P; Glasziou P; Helfand M; Watine J; Afilalo M; Welch V; Montedori A; Abraha I; Horvath AR; Bousquet J; Guyatt GH; Schünemann HJ;
    Allergy; 2011 May; 66(5):588-95. PubMed ID: 21241318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A guide for health professionals to interpret and use recommendations in guidelines developed with the GRADE approach.
    Neumann I; Santesso N; Akl EA; Rind DM; Vandvik PO; Alonso-Coello P; Agoritsas T; Mustafa RA; Alexander PE; Schünemann H; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Apr; 72():45-55. PubMed ID: 26772609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring importance of outcomes to patients: a cross-sectional survey for the German anal cancer guideline.
    Werner RN; Gaskins M; Dressler C; Nast A; Schaefer C; Aigner F; Siegel R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Jan; 129():40-50. PubMed ID: 32987160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [GRADE: from grading the evidence to developing recommendations. A description of the system and a proposal regarding the transferability of the results of clinical research to clinical practice].
    Schünemann HJ
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2009; 103(6):391-400. PubMed ID: 19839216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.