BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28461175)

  • 1. In-office Hysteroscopic Extraction of Intrauterine Devices in Pregnant Patients Who Underwent Prior Ultrasound-guided Extraction Failure.
    Cohen SB; Bouaziz J; Bar-On A; Schiff E; Goldenberg M; Mashiach R
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(5):833-836. PubMed ID: 28461175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Safe and cost-effective ultrasound guided removal of retained intrauterine device: our experience.
    Verma U; Astudillo-Dávalos FE; Gerkowicz SA
    Contraception; 2015 Jul; 92(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 25708503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hysteroscopic removal of intrauterine devices in pregnancy.
    Sanders AP; Sanders B
    Fertil Steril; 2018 Dec; 110(7):1408-1409. PubMed ID: 30503139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Challenging Intrauterine Contraceptive: In-office Hysteroscopic Approach.
    Di Spiezio Sardo A; da Cunha Vieira M; Scognamiglio M; Zizolfi B; Nappi C; de Angelis C
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):469. PubMed ID: 26718264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Experience with hysteroscopy or ultrasound-controlled removal of an intrauterine spiral with no visible thread in early pregnancy].
    Hucke J; Campo RL; Kozlowski P; De Bruyne F
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1991 Jan; 51(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 2026298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Saline Hysteroscopy for Removal of Retained Intrauterine Contraceptive Devices in Early Pregnancy.
    Sanders AP; Fluker MR; Sanders BH
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2016 Dec; 38(12):1114-1119. PubMed ID: 27986186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lost intrauterine devices during pregnancy: maternal and fetal outcome after ultrasound-guided extraction. An analysis of 82 cases.
    Schiesser M; Lapaire O; Tercanli S; Holzgreve W
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 May; 23(5):486-9. PubMed ID: 15133801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficiency and pregnancy outcome of serial intrauterine device-guided hysteroscopic adhesiolysis of intrauterine synechiae.
    Pabuccu R; Onalan G; Kaya C; Selam B; Ceyhan T; Ornek T; Kuzudisli E
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Nov; 90(5):1973-7. PubMed ID: 18774563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Removal of intrauterine devices with missing tails during early pregnancy.
    Assaf A; Gohar M; Saad S; el-Nashar A; Abdel Aziz A
    Contraception; 1992 Jun; 45(6):541-6. PubMed ID: 1617963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outpatient hysteroscopic removal of intrauterine devices in early pregnancy: feasibility and outcomes.
    Jaber S; Gilad R; Bauman D; Levin G; Voss E
    Fertil Steril; 2022 Oct; 118(4):797-803. PubMed ID: 36075745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A "See and Treat" Office Procedure for Retained Products of Conception Removal After Normal Vaginal Delivery Using Manual Vacuum Aspiration: Preliminary Efficacy and Reproductive Outcomes.
    Karavani G; Bahar R; Herzberg S; Yanai N
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):1007-1013. PubMed ID: 28642091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Of office hysteroscopy for the removal of intrauterine device. Literature review].
    Alanís Fuentes J; Amoroso Hernández MA
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2009 Apr; 77(4):197-201. PubMed ID: 19496512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hysteroscopic management of residual trophoblastic tissue is superior to ultrasound-guided curettage.
    Rein DT; Schmidt T; Hess AP; Volkmer A; Schöndorf T; Breidenbach M
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(6):774-8. PubMed ID: 22024264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Intra uterine devices removal during office hysteroscopy: About 36 cases].
    Carin AJ; Garbin O
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2015 Sep; 44(7):653-7. PubMed ID: 25304096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A novel hysteroscopic hook for extracting retained contraceptive intrauterine devices under direct vision.
    Liu L; Chi Y; Wang Y; Zhang G; Yang M; Ge L
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2015 Apr; 20(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 25666811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Emergent Laparoscopic Removal of a Perforating Intrauterine Device During Pregnancy Under Regional Anesthesia.
    Giampaolino P; Della Corte L; Di Spiezio Sardo A; Zizolfi B; Manzi A; De Angelis C; Bifulco G; Carugno J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(6):1013-1014. PubMed ID: 30914327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Office hysteroscopic early lysis of intrauterine adhesion after transcervical resection of multiple apposing submucous myomas.
    Yang JH; Chen MJ; Wu MY; Chao KH; Ho HN; Yang YS
    Fertil Steril; 2008 May; 89(5):1254-1259. PubMed ID: 17686478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of C-reactive protein levels in pregnancies with retained and removed intrauterine device.
    Deveer R; Engin-Ustun Y; Sarikaya E; Aydogan P; Doğanay M; Mollamahmutoğlu L
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Sep; 24(9):1152-4. PubMed ID: 21231846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Removal of retained intrauterine contraceptive devices in pregnancy.
    Sachs BP; Gregory K; McArdle C; Pinshaw A
    Am J Perinatol; 1992 May; 9(3):139-41. PubMed ID: 1575829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hysteroscopic Removal of Retained Products of Conception Implanted Over a Focal Area of Adenomyosis: A Case Report.
    Alonso L; Nieto L; Carugno J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(3):382-383. PubMed ID: 28939480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.