131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28461737)
1. Comparison of the biometric measurements calculated with Zeiss IOL-Master and WaveLight OB-820.
Labiris G; Ntonti P; Ntitsos K; Katsanos A; Sideroudi H; Kozobolis V
Clin Ophthalmol; 2017; 11():753-758. PubMed ID: 28461737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of OA-2000 and IOL Master 500 using in cataract patients with high myopia.
Du YL; Wang G; Huang HC; Lin LY; Jin C; Liu LF; Liu XR; Zhang MZ
Int J Ophthalmol; 2019; 12(5):844-847. PubMed ID: 31131247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the repeatability of the Lenstar and comparison with two other non-contact biometric devices in myopes.
Zhao J; Chen Z; Zhou Z; Ding L; Zhou X
Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Jan; 96(1):92-9. PubMed ID: 22943766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of IOL-Master 700 and IOL-Master 500 biometers in ocular biological parameters of adolescents.
Shi Q; Wang GY; Cheng YH; Pei C
Int J Ophthalmol; 2021; 14(7):1013-1017. PubMed ID: 34282385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of anterior segment parameters and axial length measurements performed on a Scheimpflug device with biometry function and a reference optical biometer.
Muzyka-Woźniak M; Oleszko A
Int Ophthalmol; 2019 May; 39(5):1115-1122. PubMed ID: 29700651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Axial Length, Corneal Curvature, and Anterior Chamber Depth Measurements of 2 Recently Introduced Devices to a Known Biometer.
Shajari M; Cremonese C; Petermann K; Singh P; Müller M; Kohnen T
Am J Ophthalmol; 2017 Jun; 178():58-64. PubMed ID: 28263734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ocular biometry characteristics and corneal astigmatisms in cataract surgery candidates at a tertiary care center in North-East India.
Natung T; Shullai W; Nongrum B; Thangkhiew L; Baruah P; Phiamphu ML
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2019 Sep; 67(9):1417-1423. PubMed ID: 31436184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of biometry and intraocular lens power calculation performed by a new optical biometry device and a reference biometer.
Ventura BV; Ventura MC; Wang L; Koch DD; Weikert MP
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2017 Jan; 43(1):74-79. PubMed ID: 28317681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anisometropia of ocular refractive and biometric measures among 66- to 79-year-old female twins.
Pärssinen O; Kauppinen M; Kaprio J; Rantanen T
Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Dec; 94(8):768-774. PubMed ID: 27273930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of two optical biometers in intraocular lens power calculation.
Hui S; Yi L
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2014 Sep; 62(9):931-4. PubMed ID: 25370395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The efficiency of aspheric intraocular lens according to biometric measurements.
Whang WJ; Piao J; Yoo YS; Joo CK; Yoon G
PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0182606. PubMed ID: 29036175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of pupillary dilatation on IOL power measurement by using the IOLMaster.
Khambhiphant B; Chatbunchachai N; Pongpirul K
Int Ophthalmol; 2015 Dec; 35(6):853-9. PubMed ID: 25807912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurement of the anterior chamber depth and ocular axial length: transpalpebral B-mode ultrasound using an 18-MHz linear probe compared with the IOL Master 500.
Gutierrez-Vazquez J; Perez-Sanchez LI; Satrustegui-Lapetra M; Arevalo-Manso JJ; Gomez-Herrera JJ; Criado-Alvarez JJ
Med Ultrason; 2021 Feb; 23(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 33621273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Ocular Biometry Profiles in Urban and Rural Cataract Candidates in Eastern China.
Liu H; Xu Z; Qian Z; Liang J; Wei K; Zu L; Chen X
J Ophthalmol; 2020; 2020():2863698. PubMed ID: 33489324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of a new optical biometry device for measurements of ocular components and its comparison with IOLMaster.
Huang J; Savini G; Li J; Lu W; Wu F; Wang J; Li Y; Feng Y; Wang Q
Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 Sep; 98(9):1277-81. PubMed ID: 24795336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the biometric measurements obtained using noncontact optical biometers LenStar LS 900 and IOL Master V.5.
Kołodziejczyk W; Gałecki T; Łazicka-Gałecka M; Szaflik J
Klin Oczna; 2011; 113(1-3):47-51. PubMed ID: 21853951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the ultrasonographic method with 2 partial coherence interferometry methods for intraocular lens power calculation.
Salouti R; Nowroozzadeh MH; Zamani M; Ghoreyshi M; Salouti R
Optometry; 2011 Mar; 82(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 20933477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of Multimodal Biometric Parameters for Diagnosing Acute Angle Closure Secondary to Lens Subluxation.
Chen X; Song Q; Yan W; Wang Z; Cai B; Zhang Y; Zhong H; Chen Q
Ophthalmol Ther; 2023 Apr; 12(2):839-851. PubMed ID: 36542256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of cycloplegia on the lenstar and the IOLMaster biometry.
Huang J; McAlinden C; Su B; Pesudovs K; Feng Y; Hua Y; Yang F; Pan C; Zhou H; Wang Q
Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Dec; 89(12):1691-6. PubMed ID: 23160440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between IOL MASTER 500 and MYAH with vector analysis in low and mild anterior corneal astigmatism.
Camellin U; Franchina F; Latino G; Ninotta I; Palino P; Meduri A; Aragona P
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2023 Nov; ():11206721231210895. PubMed ID: 37919941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
