230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28461791)
1. What Makes a Medical Journal Successful? Five Crucial Components.
Fred HL
Tex Heart Inst J; 2017 Apr; 44(2):91-93. PubMed ID: 28461791
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The End of Journals.
Krumholz HM
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2015 Nov; 8(6):533-4. PubMed ID: 26555127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Preprints and Cardiovascular Science: Prescient or Premature?
Nallamothu BK; Hill JA
Circulation; 2017 Sep; 136(13):1177-1179. PubMed ID: 28912371
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. How to review a paper for Heart.
Otto CM
Heart; 2015 Jan; 101(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 25502328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Being a Great Reviewer: Remembering the "Why".
Moliterno DJ
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Oct; 11(20):2130-2131. PubMed ID: 30336820
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. cOAlition S troubles top journals.
Persson PB
Acta Physiol (Oxf); 2018 Dec; 224(4):e13197. PubMed ID: 30288944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. What happens to your submission at Australasian Journal on Ageing?
Parkinson L; Sims J
Australas J Ageing; 2017 Jun; 36(2):87-88. PubMed ID: 28635096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. So you want to publish your research in the Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis?
Greaves M
J Thromb Haemost; 2017 Mar; 15(3):405-410. PubMed ID: 27966273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Message from the editor-in-chief.
Chapman JR
Transplantation; 2015 Jan; 99(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 25525913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Update on the Manuscript Peer Review Process.
Elmore SA
Toxicol Pathol; 2017 Dec; 45(8):1028-1031. PubMed ID: 29145784
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Submission to Publication in AJR: Do We Need a New Approach?
Berquist TH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jun; 204(6):1139. PubMed ID: 26001220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality and peer review of research: an adjudicating role for editors.
Newton DP
Account Res; 2010 May; 17(3):130-45. PubMed ID: 20461569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Peer Review in Transplantation.
Hutchinson JA
Transplantation; 2015 Sep; 99(9):1746-8. PubMed ID: 26308410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. European Urology: serving our readership through systematic peer review, use of reporting standards, and encouragement of postpublication review.
Catto JW; Cooperberg MR; Cornu JN; Gratzke C; Novara G; Shariat SF; Vickers A
Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):188-90. PubMed ID: 25175422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Peer review: (r)evolution needed.
Sipido KR; Gal D; Luttun A; Janssens S; Sampaolesi M; Holvoet P
Cardiovasc Res; 2017 Nov; 113(13):e54-e56. PubMed ID: 29088379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Journal's policy regarding release of information to the public.
Fontanarosa PB; Flanagin A; DeAngelis CD
JAMA; 2000 Dec; 284(22):2929-31. PubMed ID: 11147991
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Fortifying the external peer review: an editorial perspective.
Sohail S
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Jan; 25(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 25604359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Galvanising mental health research in low-and middle-income countries: role of scientific journals.
Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc; 2004; 13(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 15248395
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Checklists and
Nallamothu BK
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2018 Jan; 11(1):e004517. PubMed ID: 29330142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Independence Day.
Heinemann MK
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Mar; 65(2):73. PubMed ID: 28282657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
