96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28462620)
1. Cross-modality translations improve recognition by reducing false alarms.
Forrin ND; MacLeod CM
Memory; 2018 Jan; 26(1):53-58. PubMed ID: 28462620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Misremembering what you see or hear: Dissociable effects of modality on short- and long-term false recognition.
Olszewska JM; Reuter-Lorenz PA; Munier E; Bendler SA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Sep; 41(5):1316-25. PubMed ID: 25867611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modality-match effect in false recognition: an event-related potential study.
Boldini A; Beato MS; Cadavid S
Neuroreport; 2013 Feb; 24(3):108-13. PubMed ID: 23370492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Paradoxical effects of presentation modality on false memory.
Cleary AM; Greene RL
Memory; 2002 Jan; 10(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 11747576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modality effect in false recognition: evidence from Chinese characters.
Mao WB; Yang ZL; Wang LS
Int J Psychol; 2010 Feb; 45(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 22043843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The d-Prime directive: Assessing costs and benefits in recognition by dissociating mixed-list false alarm rates.
Forrin ND; Groot B; MacLeod CM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jul; 42(7):1090-111. PubMed ID: 26820499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. False recognition modality effects in short-term memory: Reversing the auditory advantage.
Lim LCL; Goh WD
Cognition; 2019 Dec; 193():104008. PubMed ID: 31252074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Auditory presentation at test does not diminish the production effect in recognition.
Forrin ND; MacLeod CM
Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 70(2):116-24. PubMed ID: 27244353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retrieval conditions and false recognition: testing the distinctiveness heuristic.
Schacter DL; Cendan DL; Dodson CS; Clifford ER
Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Dec; 8(4):827-33. PubMed ID: 11848606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reduced effects of pictorial distinctiveness on false memory following dynamic visual noise.
Parker A; Kember T; Dagnall N
Memory; 2017 Jul; 25(6):845-855. PubMed ID: 27637835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interaction between mode of learning and subjective experience: translation effects in long-term memory.
Rackie JM; Brandt KR; Eysenck MW
Memory; 2015; 23(3):318-28. PubMed ID: 24528147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Temporal distinctiveness and modality.
Marks AR; Crowder RG
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Jan; 23(1):164-80. PubMed ID: 9028026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Latency of modality-specific reactivation of auditory and visual information during episodic memory retrieval.
Ueno D; Masumoto K; Sutani K; Iwaki S
Neuroreport; 2015 Apr; 26(6):303-8. PubMed ID: 25756907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Encoding modality can affect memory accuracy via retrieval orientation.
Pierce BH; Gallo DA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):516-21. PubMed ID: 21261425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Metacognition and false recognition in patients with frontal lobe lesions: the distinctiveness heuristic.
Budson AE; Dodson CS; Vatner JM; Daffner KR; Black PM; Schacter DL
Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(6):860-71. PubMed ID: 15716158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic retrieval monitoring in patients with frontal lobe lesions: further exploration of the distinctiveness heuristic.
Hwang DY; Gallo DA; Ally BA; Black PM; Schacter DL; Budson AE
Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jun; 45(11):2543-52. PubMed ID: 17485102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Orthographic neighborhood size effects in recognition memory.
Glanc GA; Greene RL
Mem Cognit; 2007 Mar; 35(2):365-71. PubMed ID: 17645177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Event-related potentials reveal age differences in the encoding and recognition of scenes.
Gutchess AH; Ieuji Y; Federmeier KD
J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jul; 19(7):1089-103. PubMed ID: 17583986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The distinctiveness heuristic in false recognition and false recall.
McCabe DP; Smith AD
Memory; 2006 Jul; 14(5):570-83. PubMed ID: 16754242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The production effect in recognition memory: Weakening strength can strengthen distinctiveness.
Bodner GE; Jamieson RK; Cormack DT; McDonald DL; Bernstein DM
Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 70(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 27244351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
