These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28462620)

  • 21. The role of multisensory memories in unisensory object discrimination.
    Lehmann S; Murray MM
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 24(2):326-34. PubMed ID: 15993770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Both differences in encoding processes and monitoring at retrieval reduce false alarms when distinctive information is studied.
    Hanczakowski M; Mazzoni G
    Memory; 2011 Apr; 19(3):280-9. PubMed ID: 21500088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Anterior medial temporal lobe activation during encoding of words: FMRI methods to optimize sensitivity.
    Parsons MW; Haut MW; Lemieux SK; Moran MT; Leach SG
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Apr; 60(3):253-61. PubMed ID: 16472901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The influence of distinctive processing manipulations on older adults' false memory.
    Butler KM; McDaniel MA; McCabe DP; Dornburg CC
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2010 Mar; 17(2):129-59. PubMed ID: 19642045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Perceptual fluency, auditory generation, and metamemory: analyzing the perceptual fluency hypothesis in the auditory modality.
    Besken M; Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Mar; 40(2):429-40. PubMed ID: 24016138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Congruency effect of presentation modality on false recognition of haptic and visual objects.
    Nabeta T; Kawahara J
    Memory; 2006 Apr; 14(3):307-15. PubMed ID: 16574587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A systematic investigation of the functional neuroanatomy of auditory and visual phonological processing.
    Burton MW; Locasto PC; Krebs-Noble D; Gullapalli RP
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jul; 26(3):647-61. PubMed ID: 15955475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. False memory and level of processing effect: an event-related potential study.
    Beato MS; Boldini A; Cadavid S
    Neuroreport; 2012 Sep; 23(13):804-8. PubMed ID: 22811058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Remember-Know and source memory instructions can qualitatively change old-new recognition accuracy: the modality-match effect in recognition memory.
    Mulligan NW; Besken M; Peterson D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):558-66. PubMed ID: 20192551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Are children conservative, liberal, or metacognitive? Preliminary evidence for the involvement of the distinctiveness heuristic in decision making.
    Geurten M; Willems S; Meulemans T
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Apr; 132():230-9. PubMed ID: 25701224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A mega recognition memory study of 2897 disyllabic words.
    Cortese MJ; McCarty DP; Schock J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(8):1489-501. PubMed ID: 25220011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. School-aged children can benefit from audiovisual semantic congruency during memory encoding.
    Heikkilä J; Tiippana K
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 May; 234(5):1199-207. PubMed ID: 26048162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities.
    Rodway P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):199-226. PubMed ID: 15993828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of modality presentation on working memory in school-age children: evidence for the pictorial superiority hypothesis.
    Constantinidou F; Danos MA; Nelson D; Baker S
    Child Neuropsychol; 2011; 17(2):173-96. PubMed ID: 21271411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Common coding of auditory and visual spatial information in working memory.
    Lehnert G; Zimmer HD
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1230():158-67. PubMed ID: 18652807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Are memories for duration modality specific?
    Ogden RS; Wearden JH; Jones LA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):65-80. PubMed ID: 19391045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Memory as embodiment: The case of modality and serial short-term memory.
    Macken B; Taylor JC; Kozlov MD; Hughes RW; Jones DM
    Cognition; 2016 Oct; 155():113-124. PubMed ID: 27376662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Negative affect promotes encoding of and memory for details at the expense of the gist: affect, encoding, and false memories.
    Storbeck J
    Cogn Emot; 2013; 27(5):800-19. PubMed ID: 23134550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Superiority of visual (verbal) vs. auditory test presentation modality in a P300-based CIT: The Complex Trial Protocol for concealed autobiographical memory detection.
    Deng X; Rosenfeld JP; Ward A; Labkovsky E
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Jul; 105():26-34. PubMed ID: 27140728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The commonality of neural networks for verbal and visual short-term memory.
    Majerus S; D'Argembeau A; Martinez Perez T; Belayachi S; Van der Linden M; Collette F; Salmon E; Seurinck R; Fias W; Maquet P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Nov; 22(11):2570-93. PubMed ID: 19925207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.