These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28462620)

  • 61. The effects of diurnal variability and modality on false memories formation.
    Olszewska JM; Hodel AE; Ceglarek A; Fafrowicz M
    Chronobiol Int; 2023 Apr; 40(4):515-528. PubMed ID: 36912022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. A temporal distinctiveness theory of recency and modality effects.
    Glenberg AM; Swanson NG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1986 Jan; 12(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 2949048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. One process is not enough! A speed-accuracy tradeoff study of recognition memory.
    Boldini A; Russo R; Avons SE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Apr; 11(2):353-61. PubMed ID: 15260205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Do Format Differences in the Presentation of Information Affect Susceptibility to Memory Distortions? The Three-Stage Misinformation Procedure Reconsidered.
    Joanna U; Olszewska J; Hanson MD
    Am J Psychol; 2016 Winter; 129(4):407-417. PubMed ID: 29558049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Self-reported encoding quality promotes lure rejections and false alarms.
    Wahlheim CN; Garlitch SM; Mohamed RM; Weidler BJ
    Learn Mem; 2023 Apr; 30(4):96-100. PubMed ID: 37142336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. The influence of articulation dynamics on recognition memory.
    Lindau B; Topolinski S
    Cognition; 2018 Oct; 179():37-55. PubMed ID: 29909280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Pure-list production improves item recognition and sometimes also improves source memory.
    Bodner GE; Huff MJ; Taikh A
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Oct; 48(7):1281-1294. PubMed ID: 32399916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Multiple species of distinctiveness in memory? Comparing encoding versus statistical distinctiveness on recognition.
    Gretz MR; Huff MJ
    Memory; 2020 Sep; 28(8):984-997. PubMed ID: 32892708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. The effects of auditory shadowing on recognition of information received visually.
    Rollins HA; Thibadeau R
    Mem Cognit; 1973 Jun; 1(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 24214511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Effect of Encoding on Prospective Memory.
    Chen Y; Zhang M; Xin C; Guo Y; Lin Q; Ma Z; Hu J; Huang W; Liao Q
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():701281. PubMed ID: 35140643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. A signal detection analysis of the recognition heuristic.
    Pleskac TJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Jun; 14(3):379-91. PubMed ID: 17874580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Presentation modality, rehearsal-prevention conditions, and auditory confusions in tests of short-term memory.
    Thompson JT; Clayton KN
    Mem Cognit; 1974 May; 2(3):426-30. PubMed ID: 21274768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. How Distinctive Processing Enhances Hits and Reduces False Alarms.
    Hunt RR; Smith RE
    J Mem Lang; 2014 Aug; 75():45-57. PubMed ID: 26034343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Illusory correlation in the perception of groups: an extension of the distinctiveness-based account.
    McConnell AR; Sherman SJ; Hamilton DL
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1994 Sep; 67(3):414-29. PubMed ID: 7965600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Super Memory Bros.: going from mirror patterns to concordant patterns via similarity enhancements.
    Ozubko JD; Joordens S
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Dec; 36(8):1391-402. PubMed ID: 19015499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Modality of presentation and blocking in sentence recognition memory.
    Flagg PW; Reynolds AG
    Mem Cognit; 1977 Jan; 5(1):111-5. PubMed ID: 21331876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Differences in encoding for free recall vs. recognition.
    Hall JW; Grossman LR; Elwood KD
    Mem Cognit; 1976 Sep; 4(5):507-13. PubMed ID: 21286974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Memory for modality of presentation: Within-modality discrimination.
    Light LL; Stansbury C; Rubin C; Linde S
    Mem Cognit; 1973 Sep; 1(3):395-400. PubMed ID: 24214575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Effects of serial position and set size in auditory recognition memory.
    Wingfield A
    Mem Cognit; 1973 Mar; 1(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 24214475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Novelty assessment in the brain and long-term memory encoding.
    Tulving E; Kroll N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 1995 Sep; 2(3):387-90. PubMed ID: 24203720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.