356 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28463018)
1. A 5-Year Review of Clinical Outcome Measures Published in the Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association and the Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery.
Hasenstein T; Greene T; Meyr AJ
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2017 May; 107(3):176-179. PubMed ID: 28463018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A 5-Year Review of Clinical Outcome Measures Published in the Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association and the Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery®.
Hasenstein T; Greene T; Meyr AJ
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2017; 56(3):519-521. PubMed ID: 28476386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of patient-reported outcome measures in foot and ankle research.
Hunt KJ; Hurwit D
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Aug; 95(16):e118(1-9). PubMed ID: 23965711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality of research and level of evidence in foot and ankle publications.
Barske HL; Baumhauer J
Foot Ankle Int; 2012 Jan; 33(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 22381229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Podiatric Medicine and Surgery Resident-Authored Publications in The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Systematic Review.
Casciato DJ; Ead JK; Rushing CJ; Law RWY; Calaj PM; Mosseri AV; Singh BN
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2020; 59(3):541-545. PubMed ID: 32354510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A retrospective analysis of JAPMA publication patterns, 1991-2000.
Menz HB
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2002 May; 92(5):308-13. PubMed ID: 12015413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Top 100 Cited Foot and Ankle-Related Articles.
DeHeer PA; Adams W; Grebenyuk FR; Meshulam E; Miskin K; Koch TT; Groh C
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2016 Nov; 106(6):387-397. PubMed ID: 28033047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A meta-analysis of outcome rating scales in foot and ankle surgery: is there a valid, reliable, and responsive system?
Button G; Pinney S
Foot Ankle Int; 2004 Aug; 25(8):521-5. PubMed ID: 15363371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability and validity of the subjective component of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society clinical rating scales.
Ibrahim T; Beiri A; Azzabi M; Best AJ; Taylor GJ; Menon DK
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2007; 46(2):65-74. PubMed ID: 17331864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Outcomes Research (OFAR) network: feasibility of a multicenter network for patient outcomes assessment in foot and ankle.
Hunt KJ; Alexander I; Baumhauer J; Brodsky J; Chiodo C; Daniels T; Davis WH; Deland J; Ellis S; Hung M; Ishikawa SN; Latt LD; Phisitkul P; SooHoo NF; Yang A; Saltzman CL;
Foot Ankle Int; 2014 Sep; 35(9):847-54. PubMed ID: 25161151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A 5-year review of statistical methods presented in The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery.
Meyr AJ
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2010; 49(5):471-4. PubMed ID: 20619692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Responsiveness of the foot function index, AOFAS clinical rating systems, and SF-36 after foot and ankle surgery.
SooHoo NF; Vyas R; Samimi D
Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Nov; 27(11):930-4. PubMed ID: 17144955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 1999 Arthritis Survey. American Podiatric Medical Association.
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2000 Feb; 90(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 10697973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trends in Foot and Ankle Studies Published in High-Impact General Medical Journals: A Systematic Review.
Karhade AV; Kwon JY
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2019 May; 58(3):540-544. PubMed ID: 30803910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Podiatric foot and ankle surgery fellowships: what's the next step?
Roukis TS
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2008; 47(2):77-9. PubMed ID: 18312913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Popularity of Outcome Measures Used in the Foot and Ankle Literature.
Hijji FY; Schneider AD; Pyper M; Laughlin RT
Foot Ankle Spec; 2020 Feb; 13(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 30773056
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Survey research in podiatric medicine: An analysis of the reporting of response rates and non-response bias.
Mulvany JL; Hetherington VJ; VanGeest JB
Foot (Edinb); 2019 Sep; 40():92-97. PubMed ID: 31216499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Systematic Review of the Outcome Evaluation Tools for the Foot and Ankle.
Shazadeh Safavi P; Janney C; Jupiter D; Kunzler D; Bui R; Panchbhavi VK
Foot Ankle Spec; 2019 Oct; 12(5):461-470. PubMed ID: 30338697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Results of an Internet survey determining the most frequently used ankle scores by AOFAS members.
Lau JT; Mahomed NM; Schon LC
Foot Ankle Int; 2005 Jun; 26(6):479-82. PubMed ID: 15960915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Levels of Evidence for Foot and Ankle Questions on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination: 15-Year Trends.
Walsh CT; Grandizio LC; Klena JC; Parenti JM; Cush GJ
J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(6):999-1003. PubMed ID: 27569751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
