541 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28463921)
21. Cost Analysis of Dual-Mobility Constructs in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A European Payer Perspective.
Abdel MP; Miller LE; Hull SA; Coppolecchia AB; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW
Orthopedics; 2020 Jul; 43(4):250-255. PubMed ID: 32674176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prolonged enoxaparin therapy to prevent venous thromboembolism after primary hip or knee replacement. A cost-utility analysis.
Haentjens P; De Groote K; Annemans L
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2004 Oct; 124(8):507-17. PubMed ID: 15365714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparative outcomes and cost-utility following surgical treatment of focal lumbar spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: part 2--estimated lifetime incremental cost-utility ratios.
Rampersaud YR; Tso P; Walker KR; Lewis SJ; Davey JR; Mahomed NN; Coyte PC
Spine J; 2014 Feb; 14(2):244-54. PubMed ID: 24239803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment of medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis in younger patients: a computer model-based evaluation.
Konopka JF; Gomoll AH; Thornhill TS; Katz JN; Losina E
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 May; 97(10):807-17. PubMed ID: 25995491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Economic Decision Model Suggests Total Shoulder Arthroplasty is Superior to Hemiarthroplasty in Young Patients with End-stage Shoulder Arthritis.
Bhat SB; Lazarus M; Getz C; Williams GR; Namdari S
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2482-2492. PubMed ID: 27457626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The cost-effectiveness of outpatient surgery for primary total hip arthroplasty in the United States: a computer-based cost-utility study.
Rosinsky PJ; Go CC; Bheem R; Shapira J; Maldonado DR; Meghpara MB; Lall AC; Domb BG
Hip Int; 2021 Sep; 31(5):572-581. PubMed ID: 32853035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Do custom 3D-printed revision acetabular implants provide enough value to justify the additional costs? The health-economic comparison of a new porous 3D-printed hip implant for revision arthroplasty of Paprosky type 3B acetabular defects and its closest alternative.
Tack P; Victor J; Gemmel P; Annemans L
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2021 Feb; 107(1):102600. PubMed ID: 32409268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cost-Effectiveness of Total Knee Arthroplasty vs Nonoperative Management in Normal, Overweight, Obese, Severely Obese, Morbidly Obese, and Super-Obese Patients: A Markov Model.
Ponnusamy KE; Vasarhelyi EM; Somerville L; McCalden RW; Marsh JD
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jul; 33(7S):S32-S38. PubMed ID: 29550168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cost effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty in osteoarthritis: comparison of devices with differing bearing surfaces and modes of fixation.
Pulikottil-Jacob R; Connock M; Kandala NB; Mistry H; Grove A; Freeman K; Costa M; Sutcliffe P; Clarke A
Bone Joint J; 2015 Apr; 97-B(4):449-57. PubMed ID: 25820881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cost-Effectiveness of Surgical and Nonsurgical Treatments for Unicompartmental Knee Arthritis: A Markov Model.
Kazarian GS; Lonner JH; Maltenfort MG; Ghomrawi HMK; Chen AF
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Oct; 100(19):1653-1660. PubMed ID: 30277995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The use of probabilistic decision models in technology assessment : the case of total hip replacement.
Briggs A; Sculpher M; Dawson J; Fitzpatrick R; Murray D; Malchau H
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2004; 3(2):79-89. PubMed ID: 15702945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The Effects of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty on Medicare Spending and Beneficiary Outcomes: Implications for the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Model.
Koenig L; Feng C; He F; Nguyen JT
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Sep; 33(9):2764-2769.e2. PubMed ID: 29914819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cost effectiveness of patellofemoral
Chawla H; Nwachukwu BU; van der List JP; Eggman AA; Pearle AD; Ghomrawi HM
Bone Joint J; 2017 Aug; 99-B(8):1028-1036. PubMed ID: 28768779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty-Reducing Hospital Cost Through Fixed Implant Pricing.
Collins KD; Chen KK; Ziegler JD; Schwarzkopf R; Bosco JA; Iorio R
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Sep; 32(9S):S141-S143. PubMed ID: 28366311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Are Higher Prices for Larger Femoral Heads in Total Hip Arthroplasty Justified from the Perspective of Health Care Economics? An Analysis of Costs and Effects in Germany].
Grunert R; Schleifenbaum S; Möbius R; Sommer G; Zajonz D; Hammer N; Prietzel T
Z Orthop Unfall; 2017 Feb; 155(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 27716867
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Determining Cost-Effectiveness of Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Using the Short Form-6D Utility Measure.
Elmallah RK; Chughtai M; Khlopas A; Bhowmik-Stoker M; Bozic KJ; Kurtz SM; Mont MA
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Feb; 32(2):351-354. PubMed ID: 27665243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Dual Mobility and Conventional Bearings Have Comparably Low Dislocation Rates for Anterior-Based Approaches in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Van Nest DS; Li WT; Kozick Z; Smith EB; Hozack WJ; Courtney PM
J Arthroplasty; 2021 May; 36(5):1695-1699. PubMed ID: 33468345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Ceramic-on-ceramic THA associated with fewer dislocations and less muscle degeneration by preserving muscle progenitors.
Hernigou P; Roussignol X; Delambre J; Poignard A; Flouzat-Lachaniette CH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3762-9. PubMed ID: 26054482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cost-effectiveness analysis of early versus late total hip replacement in Italy.
Mota RE
Value Health; 2013; 16(2):267-79. PubMed ID: 23538178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The Use of Dual Mobility Implants in Patients Who Are at High Risk for Dislocation After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Young JR; O'Connor CM; Anoushiravani AA; DiCaprio MR
JBJS Rev; 2020 Aug; 8(8):e20.00028. PubMed ID: 32960028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
