203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28464372)
1. Validation of phantom-based harmonization for patient harmonization.
Panetta JV; Daube-Witherspoon ME; Karp JS
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3534-3544. PubMed ID: 28464372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improved PET quantification and harmonization by adaptive denoising.
Namías M; Jeraj R
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 Jan; 6(1):015023. PubMed ID: 33438611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Harmonization of PET image reconstruction parameters in simultaneous PET/MRI.
Laforest R; Khalighi M; Natsuaki Y; Rajagopal A; Chandramohan D; Byrd D; An H; Larson P; James SS; Sunderland JJ; Kinahan PE; Hope TA
EJNMMI Phys; 2021 Nov; 8(1):75. PubMed ID: 34739621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A novel approach for quantitative harmonization in PET.
Namías M; Bradshaw T; Menezes VO; Machado MAD; Jeraj R
Phys Med Biol; 2018 May; 63(9):095019. PubMed ID: 29726406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of strategies towards harmonization of FDG PET/CT studies in multicentre trials: comparison of scanner validation phantoms and data analysis procedures.
Makris NE; Huisman MC; Kinahan PE; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2013 Oct; 40(10):1507-15. PubMed ID: 23754762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inter-scanner Aβ-PET harmonization using barrel phantom spatial resolution matching.
Ruwanpathirana GP; Williams RC; Masters CL; Rowe CC; Johnston LA; Davey CE
Alzheimers Dement (Amst); 2024; 16(1):e12561. PubMed ID: 38476638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative PET/CT scanner performance characterization based upon the society of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging clinical trials network oncology clinical simulator phantom.
Sunderland JJ; Christian PE
J Nucl Med; 2015 Jan; 56(1):145-52. PubMed ID: 25525180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of scanner harmonization on PET-based treatment response assessment in metastatic melanoma.
Weisman AJ; Bradshaw TJ; Namias M; Jeraj R
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(22):225003. PubMed ID: 32906111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Harmonization based on quantitative analysis of standardized uptake value variations across PET/CT scanners: a multicenter phantom study.
Monsef A; Ay MR; Sheikhzadeh P; Geramifar P; Rahmim A; Ghafarian P
Nucl Med Commun; 2022 Sep; 43(9):1004-1014. PubMed ID: 35836388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Harmonization of Standardized Uptake Value among Different Generation PET/ CT Cameras Based on a Phantom Experiment -Utility of SUV(peak)].
Akamatsu G; Nishida H; Fujino A; Ohnishi A; Ikari Y; Nishio T; Maebatake A; Sasaki M; Senda M
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2015 Sep; 71(9):735-45. PubMed ID: 26400557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multicentre analysis of PET SUV using vendor-neutral software: the Japanese Harmonization Technology (J-Hart) study.
Tsutsui Y; Daisaki H; Akamatsu G; Umeda T; Ogawa M; Kajiwara H; Kawase S; Sakurai M; Nishida H; Magota K; Mori K; Sasaki M;
EJNMMI Res; 2018 Aug; 8(1):83. PubMed ID: 30128776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Defining a radiotherapy target with positron emission tomography.
Black QC; Grills IS; Kestin LL; Wong CY; Wong JW; Martinez AA; Yan D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(4):1272-82. PubMed ID: 15519800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving the detection of small lesions using a state-of-the-art time-of-flight PET/CT system and small-voxel reconstructions.
Koopman D; van Dalen JA; Lagerweij MC; Arkies H; de Boer J; Oostdijk AH; Slump CH; Jager PL
J Nucl Med Technol; 2015 Mar; 43(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 25613334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Harmonizing standardized uptake value recovery between two PET/CT systems from different manufacturers when using resolution modelling and time-of-flight.
Armstrong IS; Thomson KE; Rowley LM; McGowan DR
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jul; 38(7):650-655. PubMed ID: 28445243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Dirichlet process mixture model for automatic (18)F-FDG PET image segmentation: Validation study on phantoms and on lung and esophageal lesions.
Giri MG; Cavedon C; Mazzarotto R; Ferdeghini M
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2491. PubMed ID: 27147360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of the quantitative PET prostate phantom (Q3P) for improved quality assurance of
Fedrigo R; Coope R; Rahmim A; Bénard F; Uribe CF
Med Phys; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38348927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multi-site quality and variability analysis of 3D FDG PET segmentations based on phantom and clinical image data.
Beichel RR; Smith BJ; Bauer C; Ulrich EJ; Ahmadvand P; Budzevich MM; Gillies RJ; Goldgof D; Grkovski M; Hamarneh G; Huang Q; Kinahan PE; Laymon CM; Mountz JM; Muzi JP; Muzi M; Nehmeh S; Oborski MJ; Tan Y; Zhao B; Sunderland JJ; Buatti JM
Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):479-496. PubMed ID: 28205306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multicenter quantitative
Vosoughi H; Momennezhad M; Emami F; Hajizadeh M; Rahmim A; Geramifar P
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Apr; 13(4):2218-2233. PubMed ID: 37064407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical respiratory motion correction software (reconstruct, register and averaged-RRA), for
Bouyeure-Petit AC; Chastan M; Edet-Sanson A; Becker S; Thureau S; Houivet E; Vera P; Hapdey S
Br J Radiol; 2017 Feb; 90(1070):20160549. PubMed ID: 27936893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using compressive sensing to recover images from PET scanners with partial detector rings.
Valiollahzadeh S; Clark JW; Mawlawi O
Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):121-33. PubMed ID: 25563253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
