677 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28464749)
1. Contouring and dose calculation in head and neck cancer radiotherapy after reduction of metal artifacts in CT images.
Hansen CR; Christiansen RL; Lorenzen EL; Bertelsen AS; Asmussen JT; Gyldenkerne N; Eriksen JG; Johansen J; Brink C
Acta Oncol; 2017 Jun; 56(6):874-878. PubMed ID: 28464749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of two commercial CT metal artifact reduction algorithms for use in proton radiotherapy treatment planning in the head and neck area.
Andersson KM; Dahlgren CV; Reizenstein J; Cao Y; Ahnesjö A; Thunberg P
Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4329-4344. PubMed ID: 30076784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of the orthopedic metal artifact reduction (O-MAR) algorithm on contouring and dosimetry of head and neck radiotherapy patients.
Sillanpaa J; Lovelock M; Mueller B
Med Dosim; 2020 Spring; 45(1):92-96. PubMed ID: 31375297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An additional tilted-scan-based CT metal-artifact-reduction method for radiation therapy planning.
Kim C; Pua R; Lee CH; Choi DI; Cho B; Lee SW; Cho S; Kwak J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 20(1):237-249. PubMed ID: 30597725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improvement of dose calculation in radiation therapy due to metal artifact correction using the augmented likelihood image reconstruction.
Ziemann C; Stille M; Cremers F; Buzug TM; Rades D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 29664225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Improvement of CT Imaging with a Metal Artifact Reduction Technique for Radiation Treatment Planning-Fundamental Study of Structure Delineation and Dose Calculation].
Nishitani T; Matsugi K; Kitano T; Yamamoto H; Kaneko M; Yamada S
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2018; 74(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 29353835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Metal artifacts in computed tomography for radiation therapy planning: dosimetric effects and impact of metal artifact reduction.
Giantsoudi D; De Man B; Verburg J; Trofimov A; Jin Y; Wang G; Gjesteby L; Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Apr; 62(8):R49-R80. PubMed ID: 28323641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical relevance of metal artefact reduction in computed tomography (iMAR) in the pelvic and head and neck region: Multi-institutional contouring study of gross tumour volumes and organs at risk on clinical cases.
Hagen M; Kretschmer M; Würschmidt F; Gauer T; Giro C; Karsten E; Lorenzen J
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2019 Dec; 63(6):842-851. PubMed ID: 31265214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Geometric and dosimetric impact of 3D generative adversarial network-based metal artifact reduction algorithm on VMAT and IMPT for the head and neck region.
Nakamura M; Nakao M; Imanishi K; Hirashima H; Tsuruta Y
Radiat Oncol; 2021 Jun; 16(1):96. PubMed ID: 34092240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The application of metal artifact reduction (MAR) in CT scans for radiation oncology by monoenergetic extrapolation with a DECT scanner.
Schwahofer A; Bär E; Kuchenbecker S; Grossmann JG; Kachelrieß M; Sterzing F
Z Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 25(4):314-325. PubMed ID: 26144602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single-energy metal artefact reduction with CT for carbon-ion radiation therapy treatment planning.
Miki K; Mori S; Hasegawa A; Naganawa K; Koto M
Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20150988. PubMed ID: 26942839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gross tumor volume segmentation for head and neck cancer radiotherapy using deep dense multi-modality network.
Guo Z; Guo N; Gong K; Zhong S; Li Q
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Oct; 64(20):205015. PubMed ID: 31514173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Iterative metal artifact reduction improves dose calculation accuracy : Phantom study with dental implants.
Maerz M; Mittermair P; Krauss A; Koelbl O; Dobler B
Strahlenther Onkol; 2016 Jun; 192(6):403-13. PubMed ID: 26968180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of dental metal artifacts on head and neck IMRT dose distributions.
Kim Y; Tomé WA; Bal M; McNutt TR; Spies L
Radiother Oncol; 2006 May; 79(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 16677729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of CT images with average intensity projection, free breathing, and mid-ventilation for dose calculation in lung cancer.
Khamfongkhruea C; Thongsawad S; Tannanonta C; Chamchod S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):26-36. PubMed ID: 28300381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computed tomography number changes observed during computed tomography-guided radiation therapy for head and neck cancer.
Feng M; Yang C; Chen X; Xu S; Moraru I; Lang J; Schultz C; Li XA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Apr; 91(5):1041-7. PubMed ID: 25832695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monte Carlo evaluation of tissue heterogeneities corrections in the treatment of head and neck cancer patients using stereotactic radiotherapy.
Pokhrel D; McClinton C; Sood S; Badkul R; Saleh H; Jiang H; Lominska C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):258-270. PubMed ID: 27074489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of CT contrast on volumetric arc therapy planning (RapidArc and helical tomotherapy) for head and neck cancer.
Liu AJ; Vora N; Suh S; Liu A; Schultheiss TE; Wong JY
Med Dosim; 2015; 40(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 25242679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of dental artifacts, contrast media, and experience on interobserver contouring variations in head and neck anatomy.
O'Daniel JC; Rosenthal DI; Garden AS; Barker JL; Ahamad A; Ang KK; Asper JA; Blanco AI; de Crevoisier R; Holsinger FC; Patel CB; Schwartz DL; Wang H; Dong L
Am J Clin Oncol; 2007 Apr; 30(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 17414470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the radiobiological impact of metal artifacts in head-and-neck IMRT in terms of tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP).
Kim Y; Tomé WA
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2007 Nov; 45(11):1045-51. PubMed ID: 17574487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
