152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28464751)
1. Minimally important change, measurement error, and responsiveness for the Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Score.
Cöster MC; Nilsdotter A; Brudin L; Bremander A
Acta Orthop; 2017 Jun; 88(3):300-304. PubMed ID: 28464751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) in forefoot, hindfoot, and ankle disorders.
Cöster MC; Bremander A; Rosengren BE; Magnusson H; Carlsson A; Karlsson MK
Acta Orthop; 2014 Apr; 85(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 24564747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) and the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score (AOFAS).
Cöster MC; Rosengren BE; Bremander A; Brudin L; Karlsson MK
Foot Ankle Int; 2014 Oct; 35(10):1031-6. PubMed ID: 25015390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Patient-reported SEFAS: Questionnaire good evaluation method in foot and ankle disorders].
Cöster M; Rosengren B; Carlsson Å; Montgomery F; Karlsson M
Lakartidningen; 2015 Feb; 112():. PubMed ID: 25668801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Danish translation and validation of the Self-reported foot and ankle score (SEFAS) in patients with ankle related fractures.
Erichsen JL; Jensen C; Larsen MS; Damborg F; Viberg B
Foot Ankle Surg; 2021 Jul; 27(5):521-527. PubMed ID: 32980265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the German self-reported foot and ankle score (SEFAS) in patients with foot or ankle surgery.
Arbab D; Kuhlmann K; Schnurr C; Bouillon B; Lüring C; König D
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Oct; 18(1):409. PubMed ID: 29017475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) and the Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (SEFAS) in patients with foot or ankle surgery.
Arbab D; Kuhlmann K; Schnurr C; Lüring C; König D; Bouillon B
Foot Ankle Surg; 2019 Jun; 25(3):361-365. PubMed ID: 30321978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the Dutch version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS): Responsiveness and Minimally Important Change.
Sierevelt IN; van Eekeren IC; Haverkamp D; Reilingh ML; Terwee CB; Kerkhoffs GM
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Apr; 24(4):1339-47. PubMed ID: 26704805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Age- and Gender-Specific Normative Values for the Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS).
Cöster MC; Rosengren BE; Karlsson MK; Carlsson Å
Foot Ankle Int; 2018 Nov; 39(11):1328-1334. PubMed ID: 30035614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Good outcome scores and high satisfaction rate after primary total ankle replacement.
Kamrad I; Carlsson Å; Henricson A; Magnusson H; Karlsson MK; Rosengren BE
Acta Orthop; 2017 Dec; 88(6):675-680. PubMed ID: 28812410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of a self-reported foot and ankle score (SEFAS).
Cöster M; Karlsson MK; Nilsson JÅ; Carlsson A
Acta Orthop; 2012 Apr; 83(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 22313352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is there a learning curve in foot and ankle surgery?
Walton R; Theodorides A; Molloy A; Melling D
Foot Ankle Surg; 2012 Mar; 18(1):62-5. PubMed ID: 22326007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of three patient reported outcome measures following operative fixation of closed ankle fractures.
Garratt AM; Naumann MG; Sigurdsen U; Utvåg SE; Stavem K
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 May; 19(1):134. PubMed ID: 29720142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Large variation in use of patient-reported outcome measures: A survey of 188 foot and ankle surgeons.
Zwiers R; Weel H; Mallee WH; Kerkhoffs GMMJ; van Dijk CN;
Foot Ankle Surg; 2018 Jun; 24(3):246-251. PubMed ID: 29409251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. EFAS Score - Multilingual development and validation of a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) by the score committee of the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS).
Richter M; Agren PH; Besse JL; Cöster M; Kofoed H; Maffulli N; Rosenbaum D; Steultjens M; Alvarez F; Boszczyk A; Buedts K; Guelfi M; Liszka H; Louwerens JW; Repo JP; Samaila E; Stephens M; Witteveen AGH
Foot Ankle Surg; 2018 Jun; 24(3):185-204. PubMed ID: 29933960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Responsiveness of the foot function index, AOFAS clinical rating systems, and SF-36 after foot and ankle surgery.
SooHoo NF; Vyas R; Samimi D
Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Nov; 27(11):930-4. PubMed ID: 17144955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Responsiveness and Interpretability of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index.
Thoomes-de Graaf M; Scholten-Peeters W; Duijn E; Karel Y; de Vet HC; Koes B; Verhagen A
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2017 Apr; 47(4):278-286. PubMed ID: 28158958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Total ankle replacement and contralateral ankle arthrodesis in 16 patients from the Swedish Ankle Registry: Self-reported function and satisfaction.
Henricson A; Fredriksson M; Carlsson Å
Foot Ankle Surg; 2016 Mar; 22(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 26869497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hindfoot arthroscopic surgery for posterior ankle impingement: a systematic surgical approach and case series.
Smyth NA; Murawski CD; Levine DS; Kennedy JG
Am J Sports Med; 2013 Aug; 41(8):1869-76. PubMed ID: 23720445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. EFAS Score -Validation of Persian Version by the Score Committee of the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS).
Richter M; Agren PH; Besse JL; Coester M; Kofoed H; Maffulli N; Steultjens M; Vosoughi AR; Bahari M
Foot Ankle Surg; 2021 Jul; 27(5):496-500. PubMed ID: 34030937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
