These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2846632)
1. Characteristics of coagulase-negative staphylococci that help differentiate these species and other members of the family Micrococcaceae. Hébert GA; Crowder CG; Hancock GA; Jarvis WR; Thornsberry C J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Oct; 26(10):1939-49. PubMed ID: 2846632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hemolysins and other characteristics that help differentiate and biotype Staphylococcus lugdunensis and Staphylococcus schleiferi. Hébert GA J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Nov; 28(11):2425-31. PubMed ID: 2254418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of various methods for differentiation of staphylococci and micrococci. Baker JS J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Jun; 19(6):875-9. PubMed ID: 6381527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biotyping coagulase-negative staphylococci. Hébert GA; Cooksey RC; Clark NC; Hill BC; Jarvis WR; Thornsberry C J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Oct; 26(10):1950-6. PubMed ID: 3053756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of modified Minitek system with Staph-Ident system for species identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Crouch SF; Pearson TA; Parham DM J Clin Microbiol; 1987 Sep; 25(9):1626-8. PubMed ID: 3654937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci with the API STAPH-IDENT system. Almeida RJ; Jorgensen JH J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Aug; 18(2):254-7. PubMed ID: 6352730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differentiation of Staphylococcus and Micrococcus spp. with the Taxo A bacitracin disk. Falk D; Guering SJ J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Sep; 18(3):719-21. PubMed ID: 6355156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of trehalose-mannitol-phosphatase agar to differentiate Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus saprophyticus from other coagulase-negative staphylococci. Stevens DL; Jones C J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Nov; 20(5):977-80. PubMed ID: 6096398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of RapiDEC Staph for identification of Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Staphylococcus saprophyticus. Janda WM; Ristow K; Novak D J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Sep; 32(9):2056-9. PubMed ID: 7814525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the MicroScan system with the API Staph-Ident system for species identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Hussain Z; Stoakes L; Stevens DL; Schieven BC; Lannigan R; Jones C J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Jan; 23(1):126-8. PubMed ID: 3517037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci from farm animals. Devriese LA; Schleifer KH; Adegoke GO J Appl Bacteriol; 1985 Jan; 58(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 3980296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of different media on determination of novobiocin resistance for differentiation of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Goldstein J; Schulman R; Kelley E; McKinley G; Fung J J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Sep; 18(3):592-5. PubMed ID: 6630444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the API Staph-Ident and DMS Staph-Trac systems with conventional methods used for the identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Giger O; Charilaou CC; Cundy KR J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Jan; 19(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 6361063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Four-year prospective study of STAPH-IDENT system and conventional method for reference identification of Staphylococcus, Stomatococcus, and Micrococcus spp. Rhoden DL; Miller JM J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Jan; 33(1):96-8. PubMed ID: 7699074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of two commercially available test methods with conventional coagulase tests for identification of Staphylococcus aureus. Jungkind DL; Torhan NJ; Corman KE; Bondi JM J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Feb; 19(2):191-3. PubMed ID: 6365958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stomatococcus mucilaginosus bacteremias. Typical case presentations, simplified diagnostic criteria, and a literature review. Mitchell PS; Huston BJ; Jones RN; Holcomb L; Koontz FP Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1990; 13(6):521-5. PubMed ID: 2279383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Synergistic hemolysis exhibited by species of staphylococci. Hébert GA; Hancock GA J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Sep; 22(3):409-15. PubMed ID: 4044799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci with the API staph system. Gemmell CG; Dawson JE J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Nov; 16(5):874-7. PubMed ID: 6924937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A convenient method for differentiation of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from bovine mammary glands. Watts JL; Ray CH; Washburn PJ J Dairy Sci; 1991 Feb; 74(2):426-8. PubMed ID: 2045549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Fosfomycin resistance in Staphylococcus saprophyticus and other species of coagulase-negative staphylococci]. Loulergue J; Pinon G; Laudat P; Audurier A Ann Microbiol (Paris); 1984; 135A(2):239-47. PubMed ID: 6721325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]