These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
744 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28466361)
1. Virtual reality-based assessment of basic laparoscopic skills using the Leap Motion controller. Lahanas V; Loukas C; Georgiou K; Lababidi H; Al-Jaroudi D Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5012-5023. PubMed ID: 28466361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Objective Assessment of Laparoscopic Force and Psychomotor Skills in a Novel Virtual Reality-Based Haptic Simulator. Prasad MS; Manivannan M; Manoharan G; Chandramohan SM J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(5):858-69. PubMed ID: 27267563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Comparison of Robotic Simulation Performance on Basic Virtual Reality Skills: Simulator Subjective Versus Objective Assessment Tools. Dubin AK; Smith R; Julian D; Tanaka A; Mattingly P J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(7):1184-1189. PubMed ID: 28757439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A novel augmented reality simulator for skills assessment in minimal invasive surgery. Lahanas V; Loukas C; Smailis N; Georgiou E Surg Endosc; 2015 Aug; 29(8):2224-34. PubMed ID: 25303925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of Continuous Motion Parameter Feedback on Laparoscopic Simulation Training: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial on Skill Acquisition and Retention. Buescher JF; Mehdorn AS; Neumann PA; Becker F; Eichelmann AK; Pankratius U; Bahde R; Foell D; Senninger N; Rijcken E J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(2):516-526. PubMed ID: 28864265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator. Botden SM; Buzink SN; Schijven MP; Jakimowicz JJ World J Surg; 2007 Apr; 31(4):764-72. PubMed ID: 17361356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. New dimensions in surgical training: immersive virtual reality laparoscopic simulation exhilarates surgical staff. Huber T; Paschold M; Hansen C; Wunderling T; Lang H; Kneist W Surg Endosc; 2017 Nov; 31(11):4472-4477. PubMed ID: 28378077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Instrument Motion Metrics for Laparoscopic Skills Assessment in Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality. Fransson BA; Chen CY; Noyes JA; Ragle CA Vet Surg; 2016 Nov; 45(S1):O5-O13. PubMed ID: 27239013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of a novel basic virtual reality simulator, the LAP-X, for training basic laparoscopic skills. Kawaguchi K; Egi H; Hattori M; Sawada H; Suzuki T; Ohdan H Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2014 Oct; 23(5):287-93. PubMed ID: 24773373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of a proficiency-based virtual reality simulation training curriculum for laparoscopic appendicectomy. Sirimanna P; Gladman MA ANZ J Surg; 2017 Oct; 87(10):760-766. PubMed ID: 28803457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of a novel virtual reality simulation system with the focus on training for surgical dissection during laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy. Mori T; Ikeda K; Takeshita N; Teramura K; Ito M BMC Surg; 2022 Jan; 22(1):12. PubMed ID: 34998376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Heidelberg VR Score: development and validation of a composite score for laparoscopic virtual reality training. Schmidt MW; Kowalewski KF; Schmidt ML; Wennberg E; Garrow CR; Paik S; Benner L; Schijven MP; Müller-Stich BP; Nickel F Surg Endosc; 2019 Jul; 33(7):2093-2103. PubMed ID: 30327918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The LEAP™ Gesture Interface Device and Take-Home Laparoscopic Simulators: A Study of Construct and Concurrent Validity. Partridge RW; Brown FS; Brennan PM; Hennessey IA; Hughes MA Surg Innov; 2016 Feb; 23(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 26178693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Face, content, and construct validity of the EndoViS training system for objective assessment of psychomotor skills of laparoscopic surgeons. Escamirosa FP; Flores RM; García IO; Vidal CR; Martínez AM Surg Endosc; 2015 Nov; 29(11):3392-403. PubMed ID: 25515985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Construct and face validity of a virtual reality-based camera navigation curriculum. Shetty S; Panait L; Baranoski J; Dudrick SJ; Bell RL; Roberts KE; Duffy AJ J Surg Res; 2012 Oct; 177(2):191-5. PubMed ID: 22739048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simulation-Based Training Platforms for Arthroscopy: A Randomized Comparison of Virtual Reality Learning to Benchtop Learning. Middleton RM; Alvand A; Garfjeld Roberts P; Hargrove C; Kirby G; Rees JL Arthroscopy; 2017 May; 33(5):996-1003. PubMed ID: 28073670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Face, Content, and Construct Validity of the Take-Home EoSim Augmented Reality Laparoscopy Simulator for Basic Laparoscopic Tasks. Arts EEA; Leijte E; Witteman BPL; Jakimowicz JJ; Verhoeven B; Botden SMBI J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Nov; 29(11):1419-1426. PubMed ID: 31613679 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Transferability of laparoscopic skills using the virtual reality simulator. Yang C; Kalinitschenko U; Helmert JR; Weitz J; Reissfelder C; Mees ST Surg Endosc; 2018 Oct; 32(10):4132-4137. PubMed ID: 29602986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Face and Construct Validity of a Novel Virtual Reality-Based Bimanual Laparoscopic Force-Skills Trainer With Haptics Feedback. Prasad R; Muniyandi M; Manoharan G; Chandramohan SM Surg Innov; 2018 Oct; 25(5):499-514. PubMed ID: 29808782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]