These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28466970)

  • 1. The conventional tuning fork as a quantitative tool for vibration threshold.
    Alanazy MH; Alfurayh NA; Almweisheer SN; Aljafen BN; Muayqil T
    Muscle Nerve; 2018 Jan; 57(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 28466970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of the Rydel-Seiffer graduated tuning fork in the assessment of vibration threshold in postherpetic neuralgia patients and healthy controls.
    Whitton TL; Johnson RW; Lovell AT
    Eur J Pain; 2005 Apr; 9(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 15737809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensory exam with a quantitative tuning fork: rapid, sensitive and predictive of SNAP amplitude.
    Pestronk A; Florence J; Levine T; Al-Lozi MT; Lopate G; Miller T; Ramneantu I; Waheed W; Stambuk M
    Neurology; 2004 Feb; 62(3):461-4. PubMed ID: 14872031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Test-retest and time dependent variation and diagnostic values of vibratory sensation determined by biothesiometer and the Rydel-Seiffer tuning fork.
    Wittenberg B; Svendsen TK; Gaist LM; Itani M; Gylfadottir SS; Jensen TS; Gaist D; Sindrup SH; Krøigård T
    Brain Behav; 2021 Aug; 11(8):e2230. PubMed ID: 34087955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vibratory testing with the 64 Hz Rydel-Seiffer tuning fork and its relation to the sural nerve action potential.
    Xirou S; Kokotis P; Zambelis T; Anagnostou E
    J Peripher Nerv Syst; 2020 Dec; 25(4):395-400. PubMed ID: 33107143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Covariates of human peripheral nerve function: II. Vibrotactile and thermal thresholds.
    Gerr F; Letz R
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 1994; 16(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 8183183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vibration testing: Optimizing methods to improve reliability.
    Marcuzzi A; Wainwright AC; Costa DSJ; Wrigley PJ
    Muscle Nerve; 2019 Feb; 59(2):229-235. PubMed ID: 30390398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Normative values of vibratory perception in 530 children, juveniles and adults aged 3-79 years.
    Hilz MJ; Axelrod FB; Hermann K; Haertl U; Duetsch M; Neundörfer B
    J Neurol Sci; 1998 Aug; 159(2):219-25. PubMed ID: 9741411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The tuning fork revisited.
    Liniger C; Albeanu A; Bloise D; Assal JP
    Diabet Med; 1990 Dec; 7(10):859-64. PubMed ID: 2149682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring vibration threshold with a graduated tuning fork in normal aging and in patients with polyneuropathy. European Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) group.
    Martina IS; van Koningsveld R; Schmitz PI; van der Meché FG; van Doorn PA
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1998 Nov; 65(5):743-7. PubMed ID: 9810949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Utility of vibration sense testing for use in developing countries: comparison of extinction time on the tuning fork to vibration thresholds on the Vibratron II.
    London L; Thompson ML; Capper W; Myers JE
    Neurotoxicology; 2000 Oct; 21(5):743-52. PubMed ID: 11130278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring vibration sensations with graduated tuning fork. Simple and reliable means to detect diabetic patients at risk of neuropathic foot ulceration.
    Thivolet C; el Farkh J; Petiot A; Simonet C; Tourniaire J
    Diabetes Care; 1990 Oct; 13(10):1077-80. PubMed ID: 2209306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An assessment of vibration threshold using a biothesiometer compared to a C128-Hz tuning fork.
    Temlett JA
    J Clin Neurosci; 2009 Nov; 16(11):1435-8. PubMed ID: 19695882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Rydel Seiffer tuning fork - Age and gender matter.
    Wolf K; Beume LA; Hohenhaus M; Harloff A
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2022 Oct; 221():107385. PubMed ID: 35926295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The value of the Rydel-Seiffer tuning fork as a predictor of diabetic polyneuropathy compared with a neurothesiometer.
    Kästenbauer T; Sauseng S; Brath H; Abrahamian H; Irsigler K
    Diabet Med; 2004 Jun; 21(6):563-7. PubMed ID: 15154940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative assessment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy with use of the clanging tuning fork test.
    Oyer DS; Saxon D; Shah A
    Endocr Pract; 2007; 13(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 17360294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Proposal of a new method for the use of the Rydel-Seiffer tuning fork in the screening of diabetic polyneuropathy. A pilot study.
    de Simone R; Rabitti PG; De Feo EM; Manguso F; Piscopo G; Scionti L
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2015 May; 108(2):e21-4. PubMed ID: 25773377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rydel-Seiffer fork revisited: Beyond a simple case of black and white.
    Panosyan FB; Mountain JM; Reilly MM; Shy ME; Herrmann DN
    Neurology; 2016 Aug; 87(7):738-40. PubMed ID: 27412138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of age and height on vibrotactile threshold among 1,663 U.S. workers.
    Skov T; Steenland K; Deddens J
    Am J Ind Med; 1998 Nov; 34(5):438-44. PubMed ID: 9787847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vibration sensitivity thresholds: methodological considerations.
    Aaserud O; Juntunen J; Matikainen E
    Acta Neurol Scand; 1990 Oct; 82(4):277-83. PubMed ID: 2270757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.