These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28467023)

  • 1. The discounting model selector: Statistical software for delay discounting applications.
    Gilroy SP; Franck CT; Hantula DA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 May; 107(3):388-401. PubMed ID: 28467023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discounting model selection with area-based measures: A case for numerical integration.
    Gilroy SP; Hantula DA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Mar; 109(2):433-449. PubMed ID: 29498424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accurate characterization of delay discounting: a multiple model approach using approximate Bayesian model selection and a unified discounting measure.
    Franck CT; Koffarnus MN; House LL; Bickel WK
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Jan; 103(1):218-33. PubMed ID: 25556903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Monte Carlo method for comparing generalized estimating equations to conventional statistical techniques for discounting data.
    Friedel JE; DeHart WB; Foreman AM; Andrew ME
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Mar; 111(2):207-224. PubMed ID: 30677137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hierarchical Bayesian estimation and hypothesis testing for delay discounting tasks.
    Vincent BT
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Dec; 48(4):1608-1620. PubMed ID: 26542975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An overview of Bayesian reasoning in the analysis of delay-discounting data.
    Franck CT; Koffarnus MN; McKerchar TL; Bickel WK
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Mar; 111(2):239-251. PubMed ID: 30779349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An alternative approach to calculating Area-Under-the-Curve (AUC) in delay discounting research.
    Borges AM; Kuang J; Milhorn H; Yi R
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 Sep; 106(2):145-55. PubMed ID: 27566660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian evaluation of inequality and equality constrained hypotheses for contingency tables.
    Klugkist I; Laudy O; Hoijtink H
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Sep; 15(3):281-99. PubMed ID: 20822253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The temporal window of valuation is constricted among adolescent smokers.
    Quisenberry AJ; Bianco A; Gatchalian KM; Kim-Spoon J; Bickel WK
    Behav Processes; 2016 Nov; 132():29-33. PubMed ID: 27663667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monte Carlo based statistical power analysis for mediation models: methods and software.
    Zhang Z
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Dec; 46(4):1184-98. PubMed ID: 24338601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Discounting: A practical guide to multilevel analysis of indifference data.
    Young ME
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Jul; 108(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 28699271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ABrox-A user-friendly Python module for approximate Bayesian computation with a focus on model comparison.
    Mertens UK; Voss A; Radev S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193981. PubMed ID: 29518130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A dual-process approach to exploring the role of delay discounting in obesity.
    Price M; Higgs S; Maw J; Lee M
    Physiol Behav; 2016 Aug; 162():46-51. PubMed ID: 26884122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian evaluation of inequality constrained hypotheses.
    Gu X; Mulder J; Deković M; Hoijtink H
    Psychol Methods; 2014 Dec; 19(4):511-27. PubMed ID: 25046447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Discounting: A practical guide to multilevel analysis of choice data.
    Young ME
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Mar; 109(2):293-312. PubMed ID: 29473961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
    Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing delay discounting rates when using the fill-in-the-blank and multiple-choice methods.
    Weatherly JN; Derenne A
    J Gen Psychol; 2011; 138(4):300-18. PubMed ID: 24836568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nonparametric Bayesian methods for benchmark dose estimation.
    Guha N; Roy A; Kopylev L; Fox J; Spassova M; White P
    Risk Anal; 2013 Sep; 33(9):1608-19. PubMed ID: 23339666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Uncertainties beyond statistics in Monte Carlo simulations.
    Hughes HG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 126(1-4):45-51. PubMed ID: 17766264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. pytc: Open-Source Python Software for Global Analyses of Isothermal Titration Calorimetry Data.
    Duvvuri H; Wheeler LC; Harms MJ
    Biochemistry; 2018 May; 57(18):2578-2583. PubMed ID: 29620867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.